GMO foods subject of bill in U.S. SenateStacy FinzUpdated 7:22 pm, Wednesday, April 24, 2013Ian Purdue scans non-GMO products at a Whole Foods Market in Austin, Texas. Photo: Ralph Barrera, McClatchy-Tribune News Service On the heels of last year's defeat on the issue in California, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., have introduced a bill to order the Food and Drug Administration to mandate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. The legislation, which would require food manufacturers and stores to tag items made with genetically modified ingredients or grown from genetically engineered seeds, has support from both sides of the aisle, including more than 20 co-sponsors combined in the Senate and House of Representatives. It has been hailed by food labeling advocates as a boon for consumers who have repeatedly tried to get such laws passed. California's Proposition 37, a referendum on requiring genetically engineered food labeling last year, failed to pass. Boxer tried to pass a similar bill, without success, in 2000. But activists say that Boxer and DeFazio's proposed legislation shows that demand for a genetically engineered labeling law has reached critical mass. "This is big because for the first time in 13 years the U.S. Senate has recognized consumers' right to know," said Colin O'Neil, director of government affairs for the Center for Food Safety, of the federal proposal. "Labeling has become a nonpartisan issue. It's no longer an issue of if, but when." Unlike Prop. 37, criticized for giving exemptions to products such as beef and most dairy, the federal bill would include all food items under the FDA's purview. Foods such as beef and poultry, which are overseen by the Department of Agriculture, would also follow the labeling law, O'Neil said. Prop. 37 lost, with 53.1 percent of voters casting a no vote. Proponents of the measure said they were blitzed by the food industry's $46 million No on 37 campaign. Those opponents argued that genetically engineered crops are safe and that the government would be stigmatizing those foods and standing in the way of science by requiring labeling. But Boxer says the FDA requires labeling of more than 3,000 ingredients, additives and processes, and that now it is time for the agency to include foods that have been genetically modified. "Americans have the right to know what is in the food they eat so they can make the best choices for their families," Boxer wrote in a statement announcing the new bill. "This legislation is supported by a broad coalition of consumer groups, businesses, farmers, fishermen and parents who all agree that consumers deserve more - not less - information about the food they buy." According to the statement, "The FDA's antiquated labeling policy has not kept pace with 21st century food technologies that allow for a wide array of genetic and molecular changes to food that can't be detected by human senses." Boxer's statement said surveys show that more than 90 percent of Americans support the labeling of genetically modified foods. Genetically engineered foods require labeling in 64 countries, including Russia and China. "All over this country people are becoming more conscious about the foods they are eating and the foods they are serving to their kids," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, independent-Vt., a co-sponsor of the bill. "I believe that when a mother goes to the store and buys food for her child, she has the right to know what she is feeding her child." Stacy Finz is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: sfinz@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @sfinz
© 2013
Hearst Communications Inc. http://www.sfgate.com/food/article/Boxer-offers-new-bill-on-GMO-labeling-4460967.php |