New agency to control of US nuclear waste under Senate bill
Washington (Platts)--25Apr2013/1249 pm EDT/1649 GMT
Four senior US senators on Thursday released draft legislation to
deal with nuclear waste now languishing at nuclear power plants around
the country.
The bill would create a new federal agency for the task of disposing of
that waste, give the new agency direct access to hundreds of millions of
dollars in collected waste fees, and allow an interim storage facility
to be built before a permanent site is chosen.
Differences over whether a consolidated interim storage site for
commercial and defense nuclear waste can be built before a permanent
repository is chosen have been a key hurdle to previous legislation.
"It is my hope that this discussion draft will help us quickly
resolve the outstanding issues surrounding the back-end of the nuclear
fuel cycle, including whether progress on interim storage should be
linked with the siting of a permanent repository," said Senator Lisa
Murkowski, the senior Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural
Resources Committee.
Murkowski is working on the nuclear waste bill with Senator Ron Wyden,
the energy committee's Democratic chairman, and the two senior lawmakers
on the Senate panel that sets the Department of Energy's budget: Dianne
Feinstein, a California Democrat, and Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee
Republican.
The senators, in a joint statement, asked for public comments on the
draft bill before a final bill is introduced for congressional
consideration, and included eight sections of technical questions to
direct the responses, which address almost all aspects of the bill.
A 2012 nuclear waste bill, authored by now-former energy committee
chairman Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, included provisions that would
have required approval of a final, permanent repository before the
siting of an interim storage site went through.
While Bingaman and others have been concerned about the potential for
consent from the state and local community to be undercut if an interim
site becomes a de facto permanent repository, Murkowski, Alexander and
Feinstein objected to the provision, and the bill never progressed.
DOE has been in charge of the nuclear waste program, but after working
on the Yucca Mountain national nuclear waste repository in Nevada for
decades, and spending $15 billion on the effort, President Barack Obama
moved to terminate it, citing opposition from the state.
The draft bill would also take away from DOE the responsibility for
selecting, building and maintaining an interim storage facility and a
permanent nuclear-waste repository and put it in the hands of a new
federal agency, overseen by an oversight board including officials from
the White House, the Army Corps of Engineers and DOE. Congress would
still be required to approve any site.
That new agency would have expanded access to funds collected from
ratepayers that rely on nuclear power. This so-called Nuclear Waste
Funds now collects about $765 million a year, according to documents
associated with the draft bill.
Newly collected money under the fund would be available to the new
agency immediately without relying on congressional appropriators under
the bill. The funds already collected, about $28.2 billion, would remain
subject to appropriations.
In the wake of canceling Yucca Mountain, Obama set up an expert panel
called the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, which
spent two years examining options for dealing with spent nuclear fuel
and nuclear waste.
The commission issued its final report last year, and the four senators
involved in writing the bill have said they support much of what the
commission recommended, and that was reflected in the bill released
Thursday.
Key among those BRC recommendations was that the selection of an interim
site and a permanent repository go forward only with the consent of the
state and the local community. This was a key failure in the Yucca
Mountain project, which retained local county support, but was heavily
opposed at the state level.
In a document released along with the draft bill, Alexander separately
proposed siting an interim facility and a permanent through different
processes.
--Derek Sand,
derek_sands@platts.com
--Edited by Keiron Greenhalgh,
keiron_greenhalgh@platts.com
© 2013 Platts, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.platts.com
http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/21982984
|