Energy Secretary Chu Remains Committed to Science-based Policy
Location: New York
Date: 2013-02-06
Energy Secretary Steven Chu’s goodbye was much the same as
his hello. When the Nobel prize-winning scientist accepted President
Obama’s offer in 2008 to lead the federal agency, he said that
science would be his guidepost. And now that he will be leaving in
February, he is repeating the same mantra.
Indeed, both political parties can agree in principle that
science should dictate the allocation of both national investments
and federal policy decisions. But such paths are often tinged with
politics and the subsequent donations that the special interests are
making. And so the reality is that energy policies are shaped by a
multitude of factors, which consists of scientific underpinnings
along with the people’s right to petition their government.
“In the scientific world, people are judged by the content of their
ideas,” writes Secretary
Chu, in a lengthy letter. “Advances are made with new insights,
but the final arbitrator of any point of view are experiments that
seek the unbiased truth, not the information cherry picked to
support a particular point of view.”
The 2009 federal stimulus act had given the Energy Department about
$36 billion to provide loans, research funds and seed money to
promising clean energy technologies. The effort had also been
intended to help lift the country to its feet -- a philosophy that
has been championed by supporters and lampooned by opponents.
For example, Secretary Chu is especially proud of the Advanced
Research Projects Agency-Energy, which funnels money to those
projects that have huge risks but that also have an enormous
potential payback. The agency was created during the Bush II tenure
but didn’t receive any funding until 2009. Chu says that 11 of the
program’s companies that were provided $40 million have attracted
$200 million in private investments.
Two examples: The “SunShot” program that seeks to revitalize the
rooftop solar industry and the “EV Everywhere Challenge” that is
trying to advance electric vehicles and their internal batteries.
Along those lines, he says that rooftop solar systems have doubled
over four years and now total more 1,800 megawatts. Meantime, he
says that in the last year, wind energy has accounted for 42 percent
of all new energy capacity in the United States. ?
Discrediting his Ideas
Those programs are replete with critics, who maintain that the U.S.
government has played favorites with the people’s money. Those same
skeptics point to the failure of Solyndra, a solar manufacturer that
borrowed $528 million and that lost the whole thing.
“GDP growth in the United States has limped along at the anemic
annual rate of 0.6 percent while China’s economy has soared at the
annual rate of 9.12 percent, more than 15 times our own,” says
Daniel Kish, senior VP with the Institute
for Energy Research. “Clearly, the policies and priorities of
Steven Chu’s energy department have benefitted our global
competitors and intensified the economic pain felt by millions of
unemployed Americans.”
Secretary Chu responds by saying that the loan guarantees have gone
to 33 clean energy businesses. Those investments have supported
60,000 new jobs and generated $55 billion in economic investment.
The deals that have failed include not just Solyndra but also Abound
Solar, Evergreen and SpectraWatt.
“While critics try hard to discredit the program, the truth is that
only one percent of of the companies we funded went bankrupt,” says
Chu. “That one percent has gotten more attention than the 99 percent
that have not. The test for America’s policy makers will be whether
they are willing to accept a few failures in exchange for many
successes.”??
The Obama administration, meantime, is also supporting loan
guarantees to the nuclear industry and federal grants for advanced
coal generation. With regard to nuclear energy, the Nuclear
Regulatory Agency approved licenses for the first time in 30 years
to build four reactors in two different locations: Georgia and South
Carolina. It is also awarding $8.3 billion in loan guarantees to the
two in Georgia, which is for Southern Co. and its partners. ??
Climate Controversy
Similarly, the White House is allocating $3.4 billion to carbon
capture and sequestration efforts. Chu says that as many as 10
projects could be commercialized within a decade and that prices
would only rise 10-20 percent because of it. At the same time, the
Secretary Chu has advocated for policies to limit carbon emissions,
pointing to the multitude of natural disasters that have taken place
and the high, uninsured costs of those events.
“The overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activity has
had a significant and likely role in climate change,” he says,
adding that even China and India have accepted those findings.
Chu’s announcement is not a surprise and it comes just weeks after
two other key energy-related players have said that they, too, will
move on: Former EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson and Interior
Secretary Ken Salizar. As to whom may replace Chu, some rumblings
are centering on Former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm and
former Google exec Dan Reicher.
Scholars are not often adept at politics. But Secretary Chu has
learned the ropes, advocating for what he believes but within the
confines of an administration that must find workable solutions.
Chu, nevertheless, will leave Washington the same way in which
entered it -- with a commitment to science and how such fundamentals
can be used to advance new, clean energy technologies.
Copyright © 1996-2013 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com
|