By Dr. Mercola
As countries around the globe phase out the use of mercury
amalgam in dentistry, citing mounting evidence of significant
environmental and human health risks, the United States has
stayed mum.
That is, until last November when the American Public Health
Association (APHA) issued an incredulous policy statement
affirming that dental amalgam is "safe" and its contribution to
environmental mercury contamination "minimal."
The policy not only advocates the use of dental amalgam as
"safe and effective in treating dental cavities," it goes so far
as to say that limiting or curtailing its availability could
have negative health consequences, particularly in low-income
areas.
Unfortunately, as one of the largest public health
associations the APHA has great influence within the World
Federation of Public Health Associations, so its position on
this issue will be viewed as a broad pronouncement about what is
good for the public's health not just within the United States,
but also abroad. To add fuel to the fire, the American Dental
Association (ADA) has also come out in full support of the
APHA's statement…
ADA Still Supports the Use of Dental Amalgam
Out of step with a world trying to replace mercury-based
products with non-toxic alternatives, heedless of
dentist-members who have rejected amalgam, aware that taxpayers
must foot the bill for the pollution caused by pro-mercury
dentists, the ADA continues to shill for mercury fillings. The
ADA is also riddled with massive conflicts of interests as it is
a former patent-holder of amalgam, and helped draft the current
resolution, which could be used to derail worldwide efforts to
curtail use of dental amalgam to protect against the devastating
ecological damage caused by mercury pollution.
Reportedly, ADA lobbyists presented a
sequence of falsehoods to APHA leaders in the resolution
they helped draft. The resolution claims that mercury fillings'
contribution to overall mercury pollution is "negligible" — when
in reality, dentists are the number one purchaser of mercury in
America for product use and the number one polluter of mercury
into municipal waste water.
The ADA has also historically covered up the fact that the
term "silver filling" is profoundly deceptive, as the composite
material contains anywhere from 49 to 54 percent mercury,
thus should be called mercury fillings not the euphemistic and
deceptive term silver filling. At one time they even declared
that removing mercury fillings is unethical and many dentists
lost their licenses for removing them. The ADA aided and abetted
dental boards to yank licenses from dentists who truthfully told
patients that amalgam is mainly mercury and who advised against
its use. This was despite the known fact that dental amalgam
emits mercury vapor after it is implanted in your mouth, and
this mercury bioaccumulates and endangers your health in many
ways.
Objection to the resolution inside APHA was reportedly
fierce, with opposition expressed at both the public hearing and
the Governing Council meeting. Both the Environment,
Occupational, and Maternal and Child Health sections urged a no
vote, but the ADA political machine won out and is now able to
say that the APHA's policy "further vindicates the ADA's own
long-standing and scientifically based policy."
Some believe the ADA is actually using APHA's resolution as a
way to derail the global World Health Organization's (WHO) new
policy to "phase down" amalgam — and influence negotiators who
are considering incorporating the WHO policy into a global
legally binding treaty on mercury1
when they meet for the final time in Geneva in mid-January.
World Health Organization, European Environmental Bureau Take
Clear Stance Against Mercury Amalgam Pollution
In a letter to European Union (EU) member state
representatives and dental experts, the European Environmental
Bureau (EEB) asked recipients to support a phase-out of the use
of mercury in dentistry, both in the EU and around the world.
The EU has been aggressive in both their intent and actions
aimed at reducing mercury usage, and even adopted a mercury
strategy in 2005, which contains 20 measures to reduce mercury
emissions, cut supply and demand protections against exposure.
The EEB letter came on the heels of a July 2012 European
Commission report by BIO Intelligence Service (BIOS),2
which also recommended the phase-out of dental amalgam and
mercury in button cell batteries.
Sweden has already phased out dental mercury, and several
other European countries have either significantly reduced its
use or have imposed restrictions on it. The use of mercury
fillings is very much an issue of global concern, as once in the
environment, dental mercury converts to its even more toxic
form, methylmercury, and becomes a major source of accumulated
mercury in the fish you eat. So even if you were somehow ok with
implanting this toxin directly into your mouth, it's difficult
to ignore the environmental ramifications. Mercury from dental
amalgam pollutes:
- Water via not only dental clinic
releases and human waste (amalgam is by far the largest
source of mercury in our wastewater)
- Air via cremation, dental clinic
emissions, sludge incineration, and respiration; and
- Soil via landfills, burials, and
fertilizer
The fact that amalgam releases so much mercury into the
environment is one reason why WHO also urges "a switch in use of
dental materials" away from amalgam.3
They, too, noted that dental amalgam raises "general
health concerns." The WHO report observed:
"According to the Norwegian Dental Biomaterials
Adverse Reaction Unit, the majority of cases of side-effects
of dental filling materials are linked with dental amalgam."
Why Would the ADA Defend a Toxic Dental Product When Safer
Alternatives are Readily Available?
The environmental health effects of amalgam are well known
and include brain damage and neurological problems, especially
for children and the unborn babies of pregnant women. With
dental mercury uncontrollably entering the environment from
multiple pathways, phasing out amalgam and transitioning to
non-mercury alternatives is the only way to reduce – and
eventually eliminate – this significant source of mercury that
threatens our environment and ultimately our health.
But the ADA has continued to defend their use, even though
amalgam fillings contain more mercury than any other product
sold in the United States and safer alternatives, such as resin
composite, are readily available.
Under a "drill-fill-and-bill" approach that puts profits
about patients, amalgam remains popular with dentists who choose
not to get training in modern alternatives. Such protection of
the economic status quo makes a smooth transition to
mercury-free dentistry all the more difficult. Dentists
inexperienced with mercury-free alternatives claim they install
amalgam fillings much faster than the primary alternative,
composite fillings, but nations like Denmark, which has made the
transition, discount the claim that amalgam is more efficient.
So the rationale – a false one because of the external costs of
amalgam – is to give amalgams as a cost-savings for tight
healthcare budgets. Low-income and middle-income people, people
in third-world countries, and our soldiers – even the pregnant
ones – get mercury fillings based on this bogus "efficiency"
argument.
The APHA's Policy Statement Isn't Final... Yet
APHA still has time to undo its mistake, as its policy was
based on a preliminary vote. The final decision does not come
until February, and the importance of APHA getting it right on
the issue of dental mercury cannot be overstated. The new policy
already has many scratching their heads, wondering how they
could get it so wrong... especially since the APHA has long
recognized dental amalgam as a source of mercury pollution and
environmental harm.
The ADA will undoubtedly continue its crusade to keep dental
amalgam – a primitive polluting product -- in the forefront of
21st century dentistry, which is why support for Consumers for
Dental Choice, which has worked to educate the government about
dental mercury pollution and the many mercury-free alternatives
to amalgam, is now more important than ever.
Consumers for Dental Choice leads the battle for mercury-free
dentistry both in the U.S. and worldwide. Its financial needs
are greater than ever, so we ask for your help! Please consider
a donation to Consumers for Dental Choice, a 501(c)(3)
non-profit organization dedicated to working for mercury-free
dentistry for every child and every adult.
Donations can be made online here. Checks can be mailed to:
Consumers for Dental Choice
316 F St., N.E., Suite 210
Washington DC 20002
Also, for timely updates and information, please
join Consumers for Dental Choice on Facebook.
© Copyright 1997-2012 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.