GE Crops and Unsustainable Agricultural Practices are Destroying our
Planet’s Soil and Food Supply
January 12, 2013
Story at-a-glance
Genetically engineered crops and food products pose a threat
to your health, resistance to disease, soil, and the global
food supply
GE seed wars in India have resulted in a group of Indian
scientists being found guilty of infecting and hiding the
fact that indigenously created Bt cotton contained a
Monsanto gene in a rush to get the seed to market
A new study shows glyphosate (from GE feed) alters the gut
flora in poultry; pathogenic bacteria like Salmonella and
Botulism are strengthened, while beneficial bacteria are
weakened, which is a setup for making you sick from poultry
consumption
The world may be running out of topsoil, as soil is being
lost at 10 to 40 times the rate it can be replenished
Cultivation of GE crops may be a major contributor by
adversely altering soil’s ecological balance and fertility,
possibly irreversibly; DNA from GE organisms is not readily
broken down by soil microbes, and this foreign DNA can mix
with the DNA of these microbes to create bizarre strains,
toxins, and otherwise interfere with the biological system
that controls soil’s fertility
By Dr. Mercola
Genetically engineered crops and food products pose a threat to
your health, resistance to disease, soil, and the global food
supply. The biotech industry is riddled with corruption as companies
clamor to sink their claws into the marketplace first, to get their
seeds into farmers' fields ahead of the rest.
This pervasive corporate rush to profit at any cost places all of
humanity at risk, as the industry barrels ahead without even
questioning the consequences of their technology. Industry leaders
have failed to slow down long enough to even ponder the long-term
consequences of irreversibly manipulating the DNA of your food. And
what independent researchers are finding in this regard is truly
disturbing and is probably just the tip of the iceberg in this
genetics experiment of unprecedented scale.
When you see the term "biotech industry," you might automatically
think of
Monsanto, the world's Big Dog when it comes to GE seed. Monsanto
has shown it will stop at nothing to bully its way across the globe,
leaving a trail of planetary devastation in its wake.
Monsanto's unsavory behavior even resulted in Forbes Magazine's
retraction of naming Monsanto "Company of the Year" in 2009,
admitting they were "wrong on Monsanto... really wrong," citing not
only the problems with resistant superweeds but also investigations
of antitrust issues and a potential flop in an expensive new variety
of GE corn seed. But these high-tech seed wars have now gone
global, extending well beyond our Western borders, and there is
no better illustration than the latest scandal in India.
GE Scientists in India Found Guilty of Fraud and Cover Up
A group of scientists from the Indian Council of Agricultural
Research (ICAR) and the University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS)
have been found guilty of infecting and subsequently hiding the fact
that indigenously created Bt cotton contained a Monsanto gene1.
The variety, called BNBt, was supposed to be a cheaper alternative
to the other Indian Bt cotton hybrids. Shortly after its release in
2009, its sales were suspended, and then hearings commenced.
It's now been determined that the Indian scientists intentionally
contaminated the GE cotton seed, because "accidental contamination
cannot explain what happened." ICAR condemned the scientists'
actions as "unethical, unscientific, and irresponsible." It appears
these shenanigans occurred in order to somehow speed up the seed's
release into India's Bt cotton marketplace.2
The hearing's outcome falls on the heels of a major decision in
October 2012 by a committee, appointed by India's Supreme Court, to
end all GE field trials until certain conditions have been met.
The Committee also recommended a 10-year moratorium on field trials
of all Bt food crops and a moratorium on field trials of
herbicide-tolerant crops until an independent assessment has
performed.
Perhaps India has finally had enough. Over the past 16 years,
more than a quarter of a million Indian farmers have
committed suicide after being convinced to plant Monsanto's
genetically engineered seeds (especially Bt cotton), then having
their crops fail, leaving them in financial ruin. Could this be a
harbinger of times to come in the United States?
Latest Study Shows Roundup Creates Botulism Breeding Ground in
Poultry
A new German study3
by the Institute of Bacteriology and Mycology examined the effects
of glyphosate, the active agent in
Monsanto's herbicide Roundup, on the gut microbes of poultry.
Some birds are heavily exposed to glyphosate when fed genetically
engineered feed. The study's findings are quite alarming.
Researchers found that highly pathogenic bacteria resisted
glyphosate, whereas beneficial bacteria likely succumbed to it.
What does this mean for you and me?
The essential implication is that poultry fed GE corn or soy
would fall victim to dysbiosis, meaning unhealthy changes in their
gut flora that threaten the health of the birds, as well as anyone
consuming them. The good bacteria in the poultry gut, such as
Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, are killed off,
allowing the pathogenic or disease causing bacteria to flourish.
Varieties such as Salmonella and Clostridium are very dangerous
pathogens for humans. Clostridia bacteria are some of the deadliest,
with strains including C. tetani (tetanus) and C.
botulinum (botulism).
Chickens bred in CAFOs are already routinely fed antibiotics,
arsenic, and even antidepressants, all of which have serious adverse
health consequences. But this new study suggests CAFO chickens
exposed to glyphosate may become breeding grounds for Botulism,
Salmonella and other major pathogenic organisms.4
The implications of this become even clearer when you consider
the recently released findings of a
decade-long feeding study that showed GE feed can cause
significant changes in the digestive systems, immune systems, and
major organs (including liver, kidneys, pancreas, genitals and
others) of rats, mice, pigs and salmon. If it's doing all of that to
animals and fish, what's it doing to you? Clearly, the conventional
agribusiness food system has emerged as a major threat to your
health. But it may also be contributing to an even greater problem:
the destruction of the world's topsoil.
The World is Running Out of Topsoil
The world may be running out of usable topsoil, the layer that
allows plants to grow. According to an article in Time World5,
soil erosion and degradation rates suggest we have only about 60
remaining years of topsoil. Forty percent of the world's
agricultural soil is now classified as either degraded or seriously
degraded; the latter means that 70 percent of the topsoil is
gone. Our soil is being lost at 10 to 40 times the rate it
can be replenished, and our food production systems are to blame,
which epitomizes the term "unsustainable." It takes decades or even
centuries to regenerate significant levels of soil.
Agriculture accounts for 70 percent of our fresh water use. When
the soil is unfit, water is wasted—it washes right through the soil
and past the plant's root system. We already have a global water
shortage that's projected to worsen over the next 20 to 30 years, so
this is the last thing we need to compound it. Soil degradation is
projected to cause 30 percent loss in food production over the next
20 to 50 years—while our global food demands are expected to
increaseby 50 percent over this span of time.
Many don't realize that soil is alive and has an incredible
diversity of microorganisms. One handful of soil contains more
microbes than the number of people who have ever lived on our
planet.
These organisms create a powerful synergy with the plants and
recycle organic material, making the soil more resilient and better
at holding water and nutrients, and better at nurturing plants.
Microbes need carbon for food, and we're depleting our soil of this
element by using chemical fertilizers, overgrazing, over-ploughing,
and burning stubble in fields to accelerate crop turnover. Add to
this genetically engineered crops, and our soil is dealt another
deathblow.
GE Crops Help Destroy Soil Fertility—Possibly Irreversibly
The latest science seems to suggest genetically engineered plant
cultivation may seriously disrupt soil ecology by reducing microbial
diversity, which decreases soil fertility over time—possibly
irreversibly.6
As GE plants increasingly take over the major food-producing
areas of the world, including the U.S., China, India, Argentina and
Brazil, reduced soil fertility could lead to famine on a scale never
previously seen. The mechanisms for this are just beginning to be
understood, and what was recently only theory has inched closer to
reality as science shines more light on the consequences of
introducing genetically engineered organisms into the soil.
The mechanism goes something like this...
Special genetic elements (vector DNA) are present in all GE
plants. This vector DNA enables unrelated microorganism species to
mate, but can also be transferred to soil microorganisms. Soil
fertility depends on the presence of a diverse blend of
microorganisms, all serving different roles in balancing and
optimizing the soil. But when unrelated species mate, the soil
ecosystem loses diversity, which is proven to damage fertility.
Until recently, the transfer of genes between GE plants and soil
bacteria was only theoretical. However, this mechanism has now been
demonstrated by science, and it's our soil's worst nightmare. It
should be noted that this same process of gene transfer has been
shown to occur in your gastrointestinal tract when you eat GE
foods—turning your intestines into a virtual
pesticide factory.
Horizontal Gene Transfer Is Now Proven By Science
The following complications underscore the seriousness of the
dangers introduced by cultivation of GE crops:
DNA from GE plants is not readily broken down in the soil
and can be taken up by soil particles and microbes. The
accumulation of foreign DNA may lead to a cumulative loss of
soil diversity over repeated harvests.
Unlike the claims of Monsanto when it first approved GM
crops, Bt genes (Bacillus thuringiensis) are not broken
down, for the reasons already stated, so can accumulate in soil
and potentially produce Bt toxins. These toxins may build up in
the soil, further damaging the organisms crucial for soil
fertility. Research from the New York University7
confirms that Bt toxins are not broken down by soil microbes and
do indeed accumulate in soil; the toxins maintain their ability
to kill insects, potentially creating
superbugs that further endanger the ecosystem.
GE DNA is able to merge with the DNA of other organisms to
create new varieties of soil microorganisms that disrupt the
ecological balance. These new organisms, if virulent enough,
could
spread widely via wind erosion and ground water to
compromise soil fertility on a broader scale.
A Swiss study8
showed that adult earthworms feeding on transgenic Bt corn lost
18 percent of their initial weight, suggesting GE DNA may have
long-term toxic effects on earthworms. Earthworms are major
decomposers of dead and organic matter in the soil and are major
contributors to the recycling of nutrients. An earlier study9
showed that both earthworms and collembolans (another small
soil-dwelling invertebrate) can be adversely affected by Bt
crops.
Its also been shown that glyphosate can be toxic to
rhizobia, a nitrogen-fixing bacterium10.
Nitrogen fixing bacteria are important because nitrogen is the
nutrient most commonly deficient in soil.
GE crops are adversely affecting our soil biology in numerous
ways. There are differences observed in the bacteria occupying plant
roots and changes in nutrient availability. Many studies show
glyphosate can have toxic effects on microorganisms and can
stimulate them to germinate spores and colonize root systems.
Glyphosate has also been shown to immobilize manganese, an essential
plant nutrient. Overall,
glyphosate diminishes the health and nutritional value of the
plants it's sprayed on, as well as the soil.
The two main types of GE foods—herbicide-tolerant crops and
pesticide-producing crops—are both imprecise technologies riddled
with unintended consequences, including hundreds to thousands
of genetic mutations that have unknown effects on human health.
Glyphosate and GE crops may be leading the human race over a cliff,
as
Dr. Don Huber explains in the following interview.
Keep Fighting for Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods
While California Prop. 37 failed to pass last November, by a very
narrow margin, the fight for GMO labeling is far from over. The
field-of-play has now moved to the state of Washington, where the
people's initiative 522, "The People's Right to Know Genetically
Engineered Food Act," will require food sold in retail outlets to be
labeled if it contains genetically engineered ingredients. As stated
on LabelWA.org:
"Calorie and nutritional information were not always
required on food labels. But since 1990 it has been required and
most consumers use this information every day. Country-of-origin
labeling wasn't required until 2002. The trans fat content of
foods didn't have to be labeled until 2006. Now, all of these
labeling requirements are accepted as important for consumers.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also says we must know
with labeling if our orange juice is from fresh oranges or
frozen concentrate.
Doesn't it make sense that genetically engineered foods
containing experimental viral, bacterial, insect, plant or
animal genes should be labeled, too? Genetically engineered
foods do not have to be tested for safety before entering the
market. No long-term human feeding studies have been done. The
research we have is raising serious questions about the impact
to human health and the environment.
I-522 provides the transparency people deserve. I-522 will
not raise costs to consumers or food producers. It simply would
add more information to food labels, which manufacturers change
routinely anyway, all the time. I-522 does not impose any
significant cost on our state. It does not require the state to
conduct label surveillance, or to initiate or pursue
enforcement. The state may choose to do so, as a policy choice,
but I-522 was written to avoid raising costs to the state or
consumers."
Vermont has also created a Right to Know Campaign.
Remember, as with CA Prop. 37, these are people's initiatives,
and they need support of people like YOU to succeed. Prop. 37 failed
with a very narrow margin simply because we didn't have the funds to
counter the massive ad campaigns created by the No on 37 camp, led
by Monsanto and other major food companies. Let's not allow Monsanto
and its allies to confuse and mislead the people of Washington and
Vermont as they did in California. So please, I urge you to get
involved and help in any way you can, regardless of what state you
live in.
No matter where you live in the United States, please donate
money to these labeling efforts through the
Organic Consumers Fund.
If you live in Washington State, please sign
the I-522 petition. You can also volunteer to
help gather signatures across the state.
For timely updates on issues relating to these and other
labeling initiatives, please join the Organic Consumers
Association on Facebook,
or follow them on Twitter.
Talk to organic producers and stores and ask them to
actively support the Washington and Vermont initiatives.