Keystone Pipeline Would Present Low Risks, Study Says
Location: New York
Date: 2013-01-09
The obstacles blocking the construction of the Keystone XL
pipeline are falling one-by-one. The presidential encounter was
huge. But the next biggest would be that of the state of Nebraska,
which had put the brakes on the original deal.
Now, a state agency there has completed a report that says the
pipeline would involve “minimal” risks to the Nebraska's overall
environment. Basically, the developer, TransCanada Corp., rerouted
its line to avoid sensitive areas -- although not enough to placate
the green opposition.
“The proposed Nebraska Reroute avoids many areas of fragile soils in
Northern Nebraska,” says the Nebraska
Department of Environmental Quality. “Keystone would have
financial and regulatory responsibility for any spill associated
with the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline,” it says, adding that the
project's economic benefits would far exceed its environmental
risks.
The same analysis also says that the line would carry a product that
is no more corrosive than the light crude oil that most often flows
through oil pipelines. That’s a key finding, given that one of the
harshest criticisms has been that “tar sands” -- the fuel discovered
in Canada -- are thicker and nastier than traditional oil supplies,
and that it takes more energy to refine.
The 1,200-mile, multi-billion Keystone project has been in the
making since 2008. Now, TransCanada says that it sees daylight,
saying that once the project is approved, it would expect
construction to begin immediately. It would then become fully
operational two years later.
As for Nebraska, its Republican Governor Dave Heineman now has to
approve it. And while the project is still facing fierce opposition
from green groups, he is expected to soon grant his permission. At
the same time, the U.S. Department of State must have a full public
airing of the issues. That agency is involved because the line would
cross from Canada into the United States.
While the line avoids some sensitive regions, it will still cross a
noted aquifer used by the state’s farmers and ranchers.
Environmentalists have expressed concern that the pipeline would
leak or burst and the thick tar sands would escape, damaging the
local water resources. Meanwhile, they are also saying that the fuel
is 20-percent more greenhouse gas intensive than traditional oil.
“I appreciate the feedback that we have received from citizens, and
the hard work of the Department of Environmental Quality in
addressing this issue in a thoughtful and deliberate manner,” Gov.
Heineman says. “I will now carefully review this report over the
next several weeks.”
Hard Feelings
Nebraska had earlier rejected the line’s path, giving the president
an excuse to delay action until after the election. But in the next
few months, Obama is expected to accept the deal: The White House
will choose job creation and energy independence -- all to the
chagrin of the green groups that have said this project is Ground
Zero in the battle against global warming.
The reality is that those tar sands are going to get drilled and
transported from Canada. The only question is whether they will head
south into the United States or whether they will go east by ship
and into the Asian countries. Given that fact, the president is
expected to allow the line to go through, reasoning that this
country can better regulate pipeline safety and air emissions that
the developing nations where the fuel might alternatively head.
Meantime, the State Department has already scrutinized the pipeline
with the exception of the one area that needs to be rerouted. But
the EPA faulted its analysis, saying that it did not properly
consider its affect on climate change. Still, parts of the
U.S.-controlled line are going forth -- those links that carry North
Dakota fuel southward, and all with the president's blessings.
“Now more than ever it is important to realize that the very same
risks to our land and water that worried Nebraskans for the past
three years still exist,” writes Ben Gotschall, with Bold
Nebraska. “The concerns of Nebraskans have been ignored by our
legislature and by the Department of Environmental Quality, the
state agency authorized by an unconstitutional bill to review this
pipeline route.”
Jobs and investment will trump the environmental concerns in this
case. With the Nebraska agency's favorable review in combination
with what is expected to be an ultimate approval from the State
Department, President Obama will have the cover he needs to sign off
on the revised Keystone Pipeline.
Copyright © 1996-2012 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com
|