The Debate Over Free Energy Is Not OverSterling Allan, Mark Dansie on 17 January, 2013 (Guerilla) - "Are we not yet developed enough as a human race to be trusted with some of the most radical devices? Or do advances in technology radically develop the human race? Is there an agenda to suppress beneficial discoveries for fear it will undermine current tyrannical practices? These are some of the most important and pressing questions of our time which we attempt to answer in this lively and wildly informative interview." (Vinnie Eastwood Show; January 17, 2013) Comments: The infastructure for free energy is not free. Even the crude oil is there for the taking. It's the drilling, pumping, transporting, refining and making it available that cost money. The Earth does not charge for the oil. The water is free, the gold is free the trees are free. If we were not charged for the crude oil then the Gasoline in the US would cost about 50 cents per gallon. Even if we are able to tap into the vacum for unlimited energy, someone would charge money for it if they are able. No dought there is suppression of technologies and their development. Prohabition of alcohol in the USA was done to prevent Henry Ford from expanding his alcohol fuel enterprize where he wanted to offer the farmers a system to produce their own fuel to run their machines. Viktor Schuaberger has one of the most interesting perspectives on "FREE ENERGY" I have found. He claimed that hydro electric is free energy and that it is actualy solar energy. His claims of implosion tecnologies rocks. YouTube Video |