A bill to clarify the oversight of coal ash is
dusting itself off now that a compromise bill has
cleared a key congressional House panel. The measure
would give the states control over regulating the
coal combustion byproduct but would do so with input
from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The debate here has been fomenting since 2010 and
especially after a dam burst 40 miles outside of
Knoxville, Tennessee and 5.4 million cubic yards of
the material spilled over into neighborhoods and
waterways. The central question is whether federal
environmental regulators would change the status of
coal ash from being a “solid waste” to a “hazardous
waste.”
The differences are profound: As a solid waste, coal
ash can now be recycled and be used in such things
as cement and dry wall. But if the status should
change and become a hazardous waste, it would
theoretically stigmatize that byproduct. That would
dry up secondary markets, which would also increase
the amount of refuse that must be handled and
dispensed.
The legislation, introduced by
Rep. David McKinley, R-W.Va., passed the House
Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on the
Environment and the Economy on a voice vote. It now
goes to the full committee before it would be
considered on the House floor. It would be expected
to pass that body, just as it did in 2011.
The key, though, is getting it through the U.S.
Senate, which said two years ago that the EPA must
have a voice in this process. Indeed, the standards
incorporated by the various utilities at the state
level can be diverse. For example, coal ash is now
discarded as a liquid that goes into large surface
impoundments or as a solid that is placed into
landfills. EPA would like to see all such byproducts
converted from “wet ash” to “dry ash” and buried in
secured liners.
“Given that there is a consensus about the
beneficial re-use of the 40 percent portion that is
recycled, the argument has been on how to handle and
dispose of the remaining 60 percent,” says Rep.
McKinley. “Thanks to the negotiations held with the
states and stakeholders, we’ve done a thorough job
of addressing that issue under this legislation.”
Deadlines Passing
EPA has been under pressure to resolve this issue,
with previous deadlines passing. Now, it is expected
to give its decision in 2014 -- unless Congress
steps in and devises legislation. Industry wants the
House bill to be enacted while environmentalists are
opposed to it, saying that EPA could rule coal ash a
hazardous waste but still allow it to be recycled.
Coal-burning power plants consume 1 billion tons of
coal each year, says Earth Justice. That equates to
the production of 140 million tons of coal in the
form of fly ash, bottom ash, scrubber sludge and
boiler slag. About 200 coal ash impoundments are now
in existence.
EPA has already noted that 49 coal ash sites in 12
states have “high hazard” potential if they should
fail. It also identified 71 other sites that it says
are responsible for the leakage of heavy metals into
the ground water. “Although it was thought to be
relatively innocuous for many years, we now know
that coal ash leaches arsenic, selenium, and other
hazardous materials into water,” says the
West Virginia Sierra Club.
That argument carries resonance among many Democrats
on Capitol Hill, who say that it would not prevent
the kind of accident that occurred in the
territories of the Tennessee Valley Authority close
to five years ago. The ranking member of the House
Energy and Commerce Committee,
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., says that the
revised coal ash measure would have “little
substantive effect.”
Consider, though, that about 40 percent of all coal
ash is recycled. Any attempt to reclassify that
byproduct as a hazardous waste would stigmatize it,
making it more likely that it would pile up in pools
and landfills, and less probable that it would
re-used, says the
Edison Electric Institute.
The institute adds that Congress, not the EPA, is
best suited to regulate coal ash. Further, assigning
a hazardous waste label to coal ash would impose
compliance costs totaling between $78 billion and
$100 billion over 20 years. That would jeopardize
the operation of coal-based power plants and
threaten jobs, it says.
While the coal industry has been humbled since the
presidential election, it still has some oomph: Its
main point is valid, which is that any change in the
current status of coal ash would harm its secondary
use. That potential outcome is giving the Obama
administration pause, which just might tilt the
congressional playing field and allow the revised
bill a chance to pass.
EnergyBiz Insider has been awarded the Gold for
Original Web Commentary presented by the American
Society of Business Press Editors. The column is
also the Winner of the 2011 Online Column category
awarded by Media Industry News, MIN. Ken Silverstein
has been honored as one of MIN’s Most Intriguing
People in Media.
Twitter: @Ken_Silverstein
energybizinsider@energycentral.com
Copyright © 1996-2013 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energycentral.com
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.energybiz.com
http://www.energybiz.com/article/13/06/revised-coal-ash-bill-gives-epa-oversight-role