By Dr. Mercola
Undercover videos filmed by animal rights groups have exposed
some of the most inhumane and unsanitary agricultural conditions
imaginable, being passed off as “concentrated animal feeding
operations” (CAFOs).
At one egg producer, they saw overcrowding with up to 11
birds per cage, dead birds apparently left untended, and a
severe fly infestation capable of spreading salmonella across
the chicken population.
Another video showed “egregious violations” of federal animal
care regulations by a meat packing company. The company allowed
cattle that were too weak or sick to stand on their own to be
slaughtered anyway … this led to the largest meat recall in US
history.
In 2011, McDonald’s and Target said they would no longer
purchase eggs from Sparboe Farms due to potentially unhealthy
conditions discovered at Sparboe’s egg laying facilities by an
ABC News “20/20” investigation.
This is just a short list of the abuses revealed – and the
swift enforcement actions that often follow – by undercover
footage.
The videos have given both lawmakers and the public a glimpse
into an otherwise secretive world, and now the agricultural
industry, rather than pledging to clean up their acts, is trying
to make it illegal for undercover videos to be filmed at their
industrial farms.
Ag-Gag Bills Seek to Keep You in the Dark About Where Your Food
Comes From
Five states have so-called ag-gag laws in place, and another
10 have introduced their own anti-whistleblower laws this year.
The laws, which are being heavily promoted by lobbyists for the
meat, egg and dairy industries, would essentially prevent anyone
from exposing animal cruelty and food-safety issues at CAFOs by:
- Making it illegal to take undercover photos or videos
- Requiring anyone applying for a job at a CAFO to
disclose affiliations with animal rights groups
- Requiring activists to hand over undercover videos
immediately
- Requiring mandatory reporting with extremely short
timelines so patterns of abuse cannot be documented
These undercover videos and revelations by whistleblowers are
often the only glimpse that Americans get into the world of
industrialized agriculture. But the industry knows that the more
they see, the more uncomfortable people will become with
supporting this broken system.
They could simply change their “farming” methods to those
that do not abuse and neglect animals, and create extreme
food-safety risks. Instead, they’re fighting to protect their
cloak of secrecy. The Huffington Post reported:1
“In short, they're working to prevent Americans from
finding out about animal abuse, rather than working to
prevent the abuse. They may not be literally shooting the
messenger, but they do want to imprison her.”
Big Agriculture Wants to Trick You by Sugar-Coating Their Image
It’s very common for industrialized agriculture to pawn off
their modern-day torture chambers as idyllic family farms. Last
year, for instance, the
Pork Producers Council released a cartoon that made CAFOs
look like wonderful places for animals and workers.
They say they put up "modern" barns to protect animals from
harsh weather, illness and predators … which when translated to
reality means the pigs never get to see the light of day, are
packed in so tightly, living in their own feces, that illness
runs rampant, and as for predators, well, the farm workers
themselves are often caught in acts of abuse.
The Huffington Post2
recently highlighted a column by a pork industry veteran,3
which similarly advises pork producers to simply change the
words they use to describe their horrific practices. For
instance, he encourages calling gestation crates – two-foot-wide
cages where breeding pigs spend nearly their entire lives,
unable to even turn around – “individual maternity pens.” Other
examples include “harvesting” animals rather than “slaughtering”
and “environmentally controlled housing” in lieu of the
confinement barns they really are.
It’s because of measures like these that even though most
food comes from facilities that resemble factories rather than
farms, many Americans still believe their food is grown on small
family farms where animals are treated like living creatures
instead of commodities. This is exactly what the pork producers
and other industrial agribusiness giants want you to believe.
Because if you really knew where your pork, chicken,
eggs or beef had come from, there's a very strong chance you
would not only refuse to eat it, but would be incredibly
appalled at the very thought. The Huffington Post continued:4
“Big Ag is trying to do everything it can to keep
Americans in the dark about how it abuses animals. Whether
through ag-gag laws to prevent videos of animal abuse from
surfacing or through playing the name game, this is an
industry that knows it has a lot to hide.
After all, "one of the best things modern animal
agriculture has going for it is that most people...haven't a
clue how animals are raised and processed," wrote an editor
of the Journal of Animal Science in an animal agriculture
textbook. He aptly concluded, "For modern animal
agriculture, the less the consumer knows about what's
happening before the meat hits the plate, the better."
Agribusiness Uses Intensive Lobbying, Strong-Arm Tactics to
Control Government
You might be wondering how ag-gag laws could ever be signed
into law, given their implications for public health and animal
welfare, not to mention truthful journalism and the First
Amendment. The fact of the matter is, like many other
industries, agribusiness uses intensive lobbying, strong-arm
tactics and other abuses of power to keep regulations well in
their favor. As reported by Occupy for Animals:5
“Federal legislature currently forbids animal waste
from being categorized as hazardous. In addition, on the
economic level, many corporations are multi-state and can
simply move to another state if local laws become too
restrictive for their tastes.
Other strong-arm tactics include abuse of power at
the highest levels, industry lobby money poured into
political campaigns in exchange for less restrictive laws,
control of academic resources, and delaying tactics. Perhaps
the most damning example of political abuse is the ability
of certain corporations to claim immunity to the federal
Clean Air Act.”
The end result of these strong-arm tactics is an industry
that releases
more greenhouse gases into the environment than the entire
global transportation industry, as well as produces significant
drinking water contamination from the massive amounts of animal
waste generated.
Yet, despite their destructive impacts on the environment,
animal welfare and human health, the US government is continuing
their history of supporting these industrial CAFO operations,
both by looking the other way when abuse or contamination
occurs, and by directly subsidizing cheaply produced beef, and
corn and soy used for feed. As it stands, 2 percent of US
livestock facilities produce 40 percent of farm animals,6
and these large, corporate-owned CAFOs have been highly promoted
as the best way to produce food for the masses.
The only reason CAFOs are able to remain so "efficient,"
bringing in massive profits while selling their food for
bottom-barrel prices, is because they substitute subsidized
crops for pasture grazing. Corporations primarily use the CAFO
system because efficiency and profits are valued above all else,
even though this frequently violates natural laws and increase
the risk to people eating the food they produce. The
environmental assaults that follow are considered a cost of
doing business, but as the
documentary film River of Waste poignantly shared,
we should perhaps be heeding this Native American Cree prophecy
before it is too late …
“Only after the last tree is cut down, the last of
the water poisoned, the last animal destroyed … only then
will you realize you cannot eat money.”
Support the Food Producers Who Truly Have Nothing to Hide
You vote three times a day when you choose the foods you eat
for your meals. Will you vote for the system that is
systematically destroying your health, animal welfare and the
planet ... or will you support those who are changing the world
for the better, one meal at a time? There are basically two
different models of food production today, and there's growing
conflict between them. The first, and most prevalent, is the
CAFO model that takes a very mechanistic view toward life,
whereas the other — the local, sustainable farm model — has a
biological and holistic view.
I encourage you to support the small family farms in your
area, particularly organic farms that respect the laws
of nature and use the relationships between animals, plants,
insects, soil, water and habitat to create synergistic,
self-supporting, non-polluting, GMO-free ecosystems. Whereas
industrial agriculturists want to hide their practices from you,
traditional farmers will welcome you onto their land, as they
have nothing to hide.
Whether you do so for ethical, environmental or health
reasons — or all of the above – the closer you can get to the
"backyard barnyard," the better. You'll want to get your meat,
chickens and eggs from smaller community farms with free-ranging
animals, organically fed and locally marketed. This is the way
food has been raised and distributed for centuries ... before it
was corrupted by politics, corporate greed and the blaring
arrogance of the food industry.
You can do this not only by visiting the farm directly, if
you have one nearby, but also by taking part in farmer's markets
and community-supported agriculture programs. The following
organizations can also help you locate farm-fresh foods in your
local area, raised in a humane, sustainable manner.
© Copyright 1997-2013 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.