Myth of Dangerous Salt: Are All the Warnings Wrong?Thursday, 02 May 2013 09:59 AM What if everything you’ve been told about the harmful health effects of salt is wrong?
For decades, salt has been cast as a dietary demon. The National
Institutes of Health advises Americans to cut back on sodium to
combat high blood pressure. And the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention this year said 9 in 10 people eat too much.
But are such dire warnings about salt warranted? A number of
scientific experts and nutritionists are starting to question the
conventional wisdom. Even if cutting salt lowers blood pressure,
they argue, the effects are so small they’re not likely to have much
impact on overall cardiovascular risks.
Gary Taubes, an award-winning science writer and bestselling
nutrition book author, has been leading the charge against the
federal guidelines that warn against salt. In his view, salt has
been unfairly villainized and the warnings are not backed by good
science. Taubes tells Newsmax Health that federal salt
recommendations are based on a “selective interpretation” of
studies. He argues officials have overemphasized research findings
that have suggested a health benefit to salt reduction and ignored
those that have questioned such conclusions.
“This idea that salt causes hypertension is based on biological
plausibility and the selective interpretation of the evidence that
was supposed to test that hypothesis,” he says. “But it’s Bing
Crosby epidemiology: Accentuate the positive, eliminate the
negative, don’t mess around with Mr. In-Between.
“It’s very difficult to find studies that actually link high salt
intake to hypertension.”
In Taubes’ view, a better strategy for most people to cut
hypertension is to eat a healthier diet — specifically cutting back
on carbohydrates, refined grains, and sugars — and exercising more.
The current NIH guidelines recommend Americans consume less than
2,400 milligrams of sodium a day —about a teaspoon of table salt —
from cooked and processed foods. People with high blood pressure are
often advised to eat even less. Health experts note that sodium is
important to bodily functions, is good for nerves and muscles, and
maintains the right balance of fluids in the body. Blood pressure is
expressed in terms of the “systolic” pressure over “diastolic”
pressure and is measured in millimeters of mercury (mm/hg). For
example, a reading of 120/80 or lower is normal. People with
readings of 140/90 or higher have high blood pressure.
NIH salt guidelines are based on
computer models suggesting that a modest reduction in salt intake
could significantly reduce the number of deaths nationwide from
heart disease by lowering the number of people with hypertension.
Taubes and others argue that such research findings are based on
hypothetical benefits and statistical analyses — not significant
measurable impacts on real people.
Editor's Note:
Wheat Belly:
#1 Diet and Health Book in America Changing Lives - ONLY $4.95! Save
$21
“What the studies show is people with hypertension can get a small effect from restricting salt,” Taubes says. “But if your blood pressure is 160 and 120 is the cutoff for hypertension what difference does it make if you drop it by 3, 4, or 5 points?”
The deeper question is why isn’t more being done to drive reductions
in carbohydrates, refined grains, and sugar (such as sucrose and
high fructose corn syrup) that he says promote hypertension and
other metabolic abnormalities much more drastically than salt does.
“There are actually foods that have earned the right to be
demonized. The problem is they’re not salt and fat,” he says. “If
you restrict sugar and carbohydrates, the hypertension will get
under control. But the argument I’ve been making is that if we’re
obsessed with salt, and we’re completely focused on the wrong thing,
then we’re not going to solve this problem.”
The full version of this article appeared in Health Radar
newsletter. To read more,
click here.© 2013 NewsmaxHealth. All rights reserved. http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/Health-News/salt-myth-danger-blood-pressure/2013/05/02/id/502455 |