Fatal Flaws in Federal Nutrition Guidelines Promote Obesity
October 26, 2013
Story at-a-glance
-
According to new study, 40 years of nutrition research
funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) may be invalid, due to serious flaws in nutritional
data collection
-
Caloric intake has been under reported for the past four
decades, and the rise in obesity isn’t necessarily a side
effect of increasing calorie consumption—it might just be an
artifact of slight improvements in the reporting, the
researchers say
-
Not addressed in this study is the fact that the entire
“calorie in/calorie out” hypothesis is a myth as well. You
don’t get fat because you eat too many calories. You gain
weight because you eat the wrong kind of calories
-
If you want to lose weight and, more importantly, improve
your health, then you must replace “empty” calories from
processed, denatured foods with nutrients from real, whole
foods—especially healthful fats
By Dr. Mercola
According to a new study1
by the Arnold School of Public Health at the University of South
Carolina, 40 years of the NHANES American nutrition research
funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
may be completely invalid.
The reason for this, the researchers say, is because the
method used to collect the nutrition data is seriously flawed.
According to the study’s lead author, exercise scientist and
epidemiologist Edward Archer:2
“These results suggest that without valid
population-level data, speculations regarding the role of
energy intake in the rise in the prevalence of obesity are
without empirical support.”
It’s no secret that childhood obesity has become a lethal
epidemic in the US and many other parts of the world. The trend
is so serious, some food advocates, like British chef Jamie
Oliver,3
are taking more “dramatic” measures to inspire a collective and
cultural U-turn.
Above is the first episode of Oliver’s TV show Food
Revolution, which began airing in 2010. A major part of the
problem, which Oliver addresses head-on, is that our food
culture has changed so drastically over the last 30 years that a
majority of today’s youth do not know what fresh, whole food is.
They don’t know where food comes from, or what the food they
do eat is made of. Even many adults are at a loss when it comes
to understanding the difference between synthetic chemicals
added to foods during processing, and bioavailable nutrients
found in unprocessed foods.
Tackling one town at a time, Oliver is on a mission to
reeducate the masses about what real food is, and how to cook
meals that will promote health and longevity rather than obesity
and chronic disease. I’m hard-pressed to think of a more noble
effort. But as you will see, it’s not an easy task.
Resistance to change—even positive, life-affirming change—can
be fierce, and when it comes to altering school lunches, it’s
made worse by having to adhere to federal nutritional guidelines
that are fatally flawed in more ways than one.
According to the featured study, caloric intake has been
under reported for the past four decades, and the rise in
obesity isn’t necessarily a side effect of increasing calorie
consumption—it might just be an artifact of slight improvements
in the reporting.
If that’s true, then what is really at the root of the
obesity problem? Not addressed in this study is the fact that
the entire “calorie in/calorie out” hypothesis is a myth as
well! You don’t get fat because you eat too many calories. You
gain weight because you eat the wrong kind of calories,
which I’ll get into in a moment.
Federal Nutrition Data Found to Be 'Physiologically Implausible'
In the US, nutrition and health data is compiled by the
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).4
It collects self-reported food and beverage consumption data of
children and adults, along with physical examinations to
evaluate the health status of the participants. This information
is then used by researchers studying the effects of nutrition
and diet on the health of Americans.
Now, researchers evaluating the NHANES data and collection
methods have concluded that the data is simply “not
physiologically credible,” and that blaming obesity on excessive
calorie consumption is “without empirical support.” According to
the featured article:5
“The study6
examined data from 28,993 men and 34,369 women, 20 to 74
years old, from NHANES I (1971 - 1974) through NHANES (2009
- 2010), and looked at the caloric intake of the
participants and their energy expenditure, predicted by
height, weight, age and sex.
The results show that - based on the self-reported
recall of food and beverages -- the vast majority of the
NHANES data 'are physiologically implausible, and therefore
invalid,' Archer said. In other words, the 'calories in'
reported by participants and the 'calories out,' don't add
up and it would be impossible to survive on most of the
reported energy intakes.
This misreporting of energy intake varied among
participants, and was greatest in obese men and women who
underreported their intake by an average 25 percent and 41
percent (i.e., 716 and 856 calories per-day respectively).”
The failure to provide accurate estimates of Americans’
habitual caloric consumption can have far-reaching ramifications
when it comes to federal nutritional guidelines. First of all,
it points out the limited ability to create public policy that
accurately reflects the connections between diet and health.
It also suggests that much of the nutritional research
produced over the past four decades is unreliable at best, as
it’s not an accurate reflection of people’s actual calorie
intake. According to Archer:
"The nation's major surveillance tool for studying
the relationships between nutrition and health is not valid.
It is time to stop spending tens of millions of health
research dollars collecting invalid data and find more
accurate measures."
Reality Check—Health Is Dependent on Real Food
I agree we should stop wasting money on collecting invalid
data. The question is, what would constitute “more accurate
measures”? I’ve long advocated against counting
calories at all, as they’re a poor way to evaluate the actual
healthfulness of your meal.
You’re not going to improve your health by eating fewer cookies
than you did before if your entire diet consists of different
kinds of pastries. If you really want to lose weight and, more
importantly, improve your health, then you must replace
“empty” calories from processed, denatured foods with nutrients
from real, whole foods—especially healthful fats, which I’ll
address below.
Three decades ago, the food available was mostly fresh and
grown locally. Today, the majority of foods served, whether at
home, in school or in restaurants, are highly processed foods,
filled with sugars and chemical additives. During that same
time,
childhood obesity has more than tripled. In the US, more
than one-third of children and adolescents are now overweight or
obese.
Regardless of whether our federal nutrition guidelines are
based on accurate calorie intake or not, cutting down on
calories alone is not going to fix the problem of childhood
obesity and the alarming rise of chronic disease in children and
teens. Children need to be fed properly, and Oliver’s TV show
clearly pinpoints what’s wrong with the American diet.
Why Counting Calories Doesn’t Work
In a nutshell, it’s FAR more important to look at the
source of the calories than counting them. Contrary to
popular belief, you do NOT need 45-65 percent of your daily
calories in the form of carbs, as recommended by the 2010
Dietary Guidelines for Americans.7
It’s these kinds of nutritional guidelines that are
responsible for promoting obesity in the first place! It would
be one thing if the recommendation was that half of your diet
should consist of vegetable carbs, but that’s not the
case. No, the federal recommendations for carbs touted by health
agencies and nutritionists around the country include starches,
fiber, grains, sugar alcohols, and naturally-occurring and added
sugars—the very things that drive obesity and chronic disease
rates skyward... According to the 2010 Report of the Dietary
Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for
Americans,8
the top 10 sources of calories in the American diet are:
|
1. Grain-based desserts (cakes, cookies, donuts, pies,
crisps, cobblers, and granola bars), 139 calories a day |
6. Alcoholic beverages |
|
2. Yeast breads, 129 calories a day |
7. Pasta and pasta dishes |
|
3. Chicken and chicken-mixed dishes, 121 calories a day |
8. Mexican mixed dishes |
|
4. Soda, energy drinks, and sports drinks, 114 calories
a day |
9. Beef and beef-mixed dishes |
|
5. Pizza, 98 calories a day |
10. Dairy desserts |
Looking at this list, it should be fairly easy to see the
dietary roots of the American weight problem. Four of the top
five sources of calories are carbs—sugars (primarily fructose)
and grains—just as recommended. And while soda has dropped down
to number four (it used to be number one), I still believe a lot
of people, particularly teenagers, probably get a majority of
their calories from sugary beverages like
soda.
To Optimize Your Health, Pay Attention to the SOURCE of Your
Calories
In order to curb the current obesity epidemic, we do not need
more accurate reporting of calories; we need to start focusing
on eating the right kind of calories. I firmly believe
that the primary keys for successful weight management and
optimal health are:
- Severely restricting carbohydrates (sugars, fructose,
and grains) in your diet
- Increasing healthy fat consumption
- Unlimited consumption of non starchy vegetables. Because
they are so low calorie, the majority of the food on your
plate will be vegetables
- Limit the use of protein to less than one half gram per
pound of body weight
Healthful fat can be rich in calories, but these calories
will not affect your body in the same way as calories
from non-vegetable carbs. As explained by
Dr. Robert Lustig, fructose in particular is "isocaloric but
not isometabolic." This means you can have the same amount of
calories from fructose or glucose, fructose and protein, or
fructose and fat, but the metabolic effect will be
entirely different despite the identical calorie count. Eating
dietary fat isn’t what’s making you pack on the pounds. It’s the
sugar/fructose and grains that are adding the padding.
So please, don’t fall for the low-fat myth, as this too is a
factor in the rise in chronic health problems such as heart
disease and Alzheimer’s. Your brain, heart and cardiovascular
system need healthy fat for optimal functioning. In
fact,
emerging evidence suggests most people need at least half of
their daily calories from healthy fat, and possibly as high as
70 percent. My personal diet is about 60-70 percent healthy fat.
Add to that a small to medium amount of high-quality protein and
plenty of vegetables. You actually need very few carbs
besides vegetables; so you see, the federal guidelines are about
as lopsided as they could be... pushing you toward
obesity and poor health, if you follow them.
Hunger Can Be Used as a Guide to Determine How Much Fat You Need
Many do not realize this, but frequent hunger may be a
major clue that you're not eating correctly and are using
carbs as your primary fuel. Not only is it an indication that
you're consuming the wrong types of food, but it's also
a sign that you're likely consuming them in lopsided ratios
for your individual biochemistry, and the timing of your eating
may benefit from adjustment. Fat is far more satiating than
carbs, so if you have cut down on carbs and feel ravenous,
thinking you "can't do without the carbs," remember this is a
sign that you haven't replaced them with sufficient amounts of
fat. So go ahead and add a bit more. You do want to make sure
you're adding the correct types of fat though. And vegetable
oils like canola and corn oil, with the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) recommends is NOT on the healthy list… Sources of
healthy fats include:
|
Olives and
olive oil |
Coconuts and
coconut oil |
Butter made from raw grass-fed organic milk |
|
Raw nuts, such as almonds or pecans |
Organic pastured egg yolks |
Avocados |
|
Grass-fed meats |
Palm oil |
Unheated organic nut oils |
Another
healthful fat you want to be mindful of is animal-based omega-3.
Deficiency in this essential fat can cause or contribute to very
serious health problems, both mental and physical, and may be a
significant underlying factor of up to 96,000 premature deaths
each year. For more information about omega-3s and the best
sources of this fat, please
review this previous article.
Healthy Eating Starts at Home
Home used to be the heart of passing on food culture. This
rarely happens anymore, and children are suffering the
consequences. School lunches also used to be far more
nutritious. Today, as evidenced in the video above, most of the
food served at school is processed food, requiring only to be
reheated.
Sadly, many parents today don’t even know how to cook with
fresh ingredients, because their parents embraced the novel
convenience of the TV dinner back in the 50s. I’ve said this for
many years, and it’s worth repeating many times over because
it’s one of the main solutions to the obesity epidemic—Cook your
food from scratch, at home!
Many people are under the mistaken impression that cooking
from scratch is an extremely complicated affair that takes lots
of time and costs more than they could possibly afford. Part of
Jamie Oliver’s mission is to show the fallacy of this kind of
thinking. There are plenty of sources for simple
recipes, many of which are free if you have access to the
internet. In a previous article, Colleen Huber offers a list of
helpful guidelines on
how to cook whole food from scratch while keeping your day
job.
It does require some pre-planning in many cases, but remember
that learning to plan your meals may actually reduce
your stress levels rather than increase them! Many people resort
to fast foods and processed foods simply because they’re too
frazzled at the end of their work day to figure out what to
cook. Planning a menu and shopping ahead could actually turn
meal time into a more relaxed time spent with family.
Also, remember that whatever money you think you’re saving
now by using processed foods, you’ll end up paying many times
over later on when your health begins to fail. Proper nutrition,
consisting mainly of whole, fresh foods, really is your number
one health insurance policy. Likewise, children will not know
which foods are healthy unless you, as a parent, teach it to
them. Please, understand that poor eating habits at home,
combined with poor food selections at school, may set your child
up for long-term physical and
behavioral problems.
Are You Trying to Eat Healthy on a Budget?
While it may not be immediately obvious for people who have
grown up relying on ready-made, pre-packaged foods and snacks,
you can replace those foods with something equally satisfying
that will support, rather than wreck, your health. This requires
some strategy, especially if you're working with a tight budget,
but it can be done:
- Identify a person to prepare meals.
Someone has to invest some time in the kitchen. It will be
necessary for either you, your spouse, or perhaps someone in
your family prepare the meals from locally grown healthful
foods. This includes packing lunches for your kids to take
to school.
- Become resourceful: This is an area
where your grandmother can be a wealth of information, as
how to use up every morsel of food and stretch out a good
meal was common knowledge to generations past. Seek to get
back to the basics of cooking – using the bones from a roast
chicken to make stock for a pot of soup, extending a Sunday
roast to use for weekday dinners, learning how to make
hearty stews from inexpensive cuts of meat, using up
leftovers and so on.
- Plan your meals: If you fail to plan
you are planning to fail. This is essential, as you will
need to be prepared for mealtimes in advance to be
successful. Ideally, this will involve scouting out your
local farmer's markets for in-season produce that is priced
to sell, and planning your meals accordingly, but you can
also use this same premise with supermarket sales.
You can generally plan a week of meals at a time, make
sure you have all ingredients necessary on hand, and then do
any prep work you can ahead of time so that dinner is easy
to prepare if you're short on time in the evenings.
It is no mystery that you will be eating lunch around
noon every day so rather than rely on fast food at work,
before you go to bed make a plan as to what you are going to
take to work the next day. This is a marvelous simple
strategy that will let you eat healthier, especially if you
take healthy food from home in to work.
- Avoid food waste: According to a study
published in the journal PloS One, Americans waste
an estimated 1,400 calories of food per person, each and
every day. The two steps above will help you to mitigate
food waste in your home. You may also have seen my article
titled "14
Ways to Save Money on Groceries." Among those tips are
suggestions for keeping your groceries fresher, longer, and
I suggest reviewing those tips now.
- Buy organic animal foods. The most
important foods to buy organic are animal, not vegetable,
products (meat, eggs, butter, etc.), because animal foods
tend to concentrate pesticides in higher amounts. If you
cannot afford to buy all of your food organic, opt for
organic animal foods first.
- Keep costs down on grass-fed beef.
Pasture-finished beef is far healthier than grain-fed
beef (which I don't recommend consuming). To keep cost down,
look for inexpensive roasts or ground meat. You may also
save money by buying an entire side of beef (or splitting
one with two or three other families), if you have enough
freezer space to store it.
- Buy in bulk when non-perishable items go on
sale. If you are fortunate to live near a buyer's
club or a co-op, you may also be able to take advantage of
buying by the pound from bins, saving both you and the
supplier the cost of expensive packaging.
- Frequent farmer's markets or grow your own
produce. You may be surprised to find out that by
going directly to the source you can get amazingly healthy,
locally grown, organic food for less than you can find at
your supermarket. This gives you the best of both worlds:
food that is grown near to you, cutting down on its carbon
footprint and giving you optimal freshness, as well as grown
without chemicals, genetically modified seeds, and other
potential toxins.
Just as restaurants are able to keep their costs down by
getting food directly from a supplier, you, too, can take
advantage of a direct farm-to-consumer relationship, either on
an individual basis or by joining a food coop in your area. Many
farmer's markets are also now accepting food stamps, so this is
an opportunity most everyone can join in on.
© Copyright 1997-2013 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/10/26/flawed-federal-nutrition-data.aspx
|