Hurricane control methodology offered to World Meteorological
Organization
After four years of what they consider to be great success in
staving off most hurricanes from the U.S. mainland Albert Feliciano,
David Wells' weather modification associate says it's about time that
the WMO pays attention and begins implementing these methods more
effectively.
by
Sterling D. Allan
for Pure Energy Systems News
Could a device this simple hold
off, steer, or diminish a Hurricane? |
Four years ago, we published a
story about
David Wells' Weather Control methodology, with the description:
Who you gonna call when you have a nasty, persistent drought?
David Wells' weather modification researchers have been fine tuning
their skills. Alberto Feliciano in Puerto Rico appears to have
dissolved this season's tropical and hurricane storms, including
Ana, Erika and Bill....
And I'll repeat what I said two years ago in writing a follow-up
article:
You have to admit that hurricanes making landfall have been
sparse in the U.S. I've been paying special attention to this,
but have not been quantifying it. The absence has been
particularly poignant this year since the prediction has been that
this will be an above-average season.
Today, Albert Feliciano, who is David's
Weather Rangers associate and nearly single-handedly responsible,
using this technology, for preventing hurricanes from making landfall on
mainland, USA for four years, sent me an open letter to the World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) to adopt this technology. He basically
tells them: "Look, your data and model predicted one thing, but what has
actually happened has been very different. You know there is something
unusual going on, and we're here to tell you that we are the ones who
are steering these things and mitigating their otherwise calamitous
effects on the mainland. Don't you think its time you paid us some
attention and consider implementing what we are doing?"
Last year, when Hurricane Sandy came ashore, I asked them what happened,
and Albert said that he was travelling at the time and was not able to
be on station, but he did get back in time to mitigate the tail end of
the storm.
Here is Alberto's email to the WMO.
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo" <wmo@wmo.int>;
"david wells"
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 2:40 PM
Subject: About the Elimination of Tropical Storms
Hi Everybody:
The disappearance of tropical storm Karen should come as no
surprise to those who are aware of the existance of the David
Wells' Weather Machines (DWWM). What you have witnessed is the
performance of the machine moved by a "Sweeper" dissorganizing
tropical storms from close proximity. The effects on a tropical
storm or hurricane when acted upon from a distance of several
thousand miles are easier to see because a Sweeper is not
needed. The storm then takes the shape of the letter "D" until
it is dissolved by wind shear.
This past Spring the DWWMs were greatly improved and are
performing as best as could be hoped for, and so far this
hurricane season has proved to be one of the quietest ones yet
despite the statistical weather data pointing otherwise. And due
to the fact that Weather Professionals are mathematical geniuses
and experts in the accumulation of statistical data there should
be no doubt in their minds that the evidence seen so far (the
dissipation of hurricanes for no apparent reason) cannot be
attributed to coincidence.
We, the DWWM operators have been saying all along that this
year's tropical storms and hurricanes would be dissipated by our
wind-shear producing machines. You, the World Meteorological
Organization should be the ones operating these machines. In
fact, all official weather stations on our planet should have
trained personnel capable of working the DWWMs for the benefit
of humankind. Your deep understanding and expertise of weather
systems is needed to efficiently handle these powerful machines.
I do not exagerate when I use the word "powerful", as the
machine's latest feat exercised on tropical storm Karen (2013)
has been seen by all.
The "power" of a DWWM may best be understood if we compare it
to a radio broadcasting antenna. An antenna takes the same
amount of output power to transmit an audio signal to one radio
set receiver as it does to 10 million receivers. The DWWM seems
to be working on the same basic principle, only that instead of
radios we are "broadcasting" to individual water molecules which
are suspended in our atmosphere, influencing these water
molecules within and beyond the targeted tropical system so that
they react as a collective unit. That is the beauty of the DWWM.
I strongly suggest that you, the WMO, contact the inventor,
Mr. David Wells, for further information. Mr. Wells and I will
be happy to answer any questions that you may have on this new
technology.
Alberto
|
In this next email from last month, he explained some principles behind
why/how he thinks this technology works.
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Cc: ...
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:20 PM
Subject: Tips on David Well's Weather Machine
Hi Everybody:
Just a note to talk about a few things that I think may help
us make the best use of the DWWM (David Wells Weather Machine)
improvement information from my past few e-mails. Dr. Nikola
Tesla explained in a few of his patents that electricity will
travel through a circuit at the speed of light and that the
length of the circuit decides the optimum functioning frequency
for that circuit. This means that if we operate that particular
circuit at the frequency best suited to its length it will then
be working in harmony with Nature and the frequency waves will
have steady node placements. This is the ideal construction
which allows a standing wave to be generated in that circuit,
giving us what has been called by some super-conductivity. I am
of the opinion that it is the magnetism generated by the
Back-Electromotive-Force produced by the coil while working
under super-conductive conditions which allows the DWWMs to
affect the weather. This seems to happen only if the DWWM
circuit is built planning ahead for its working frequency and
also that it matches the Planet's and the water molecule's rate
of vibration (frequency).
If we go by what Dr. Tesla taught us we will then calculate
the frequency flowing through the coil by dividing the speed of
light by the wire length of not only the coil but the complete
circuit to which the coil is connected.
The bifilar coil in my machine is built from a 3 pound spool
of 22 AWG magnet wire 1575 ft long (482.1 meters). I got the
magnet wire from Paramount Wire Co. in New Jersey, USA (tel.
973-672-0500). They sell a three-pound spool of 22 AWG magnet
wire at a reasonable price.
My machine has an extra 8 feet (2.5 meters) of circuit if you
count the wires from the points, the battery cables and the
battery lengths (the distance between battery poles). That gives
us a total circuit length of 484.6 meters.
Here are the numbers, then: light travels at 299,776
kilometers per second which divided by 484.6 meters equals 618.6
KHz. That comes very close to the 600 KHz hinted at in Dr.
Tesla's information, 600 KHz being a harmonic of the 60 Hz he
suggested.
So a circuit built to resonate at about 618.6 KHz seems to be
the ideal for working with the weather. My suggestion to you is
that you build or rebuild your machine's coil to a bifilar coil
to the same lengths as given above. And after you are done with
the coil don't forget to place an aluminum plate on the side of
your machine to create a shaded-compound-pole.
Happy hurricane and typhoon hunting.
Alberto
|
In this email from the day before 9/11/13, he explains why he has had to
move, so he will not be on station in Puerto Rico where he is optimally
situated to steer hurricanes.
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:46 AM
Subject: Weather Machine is no longer in Puerto Rico
Hi everybody:
Just a note to let y'all know that I am not in Puerto Rico
any longer. I left the island the middle of August and will not
be returning to the area. Chronic unemployment which I attribute
to the corrupt Puerto Rican political system has forced my move
from the area. That is a pity because the location was ideal for
controlling storms over the entire Atlantic. Nevertheless, your
newly upgraded DWWMs (David Wells Weather Machines) can now
handle weather from much farther distances and I trust that
machines in the mainland United States will easily handle the
bad weather all the way to Africa. As a matter of fact, I have
seen repeated evidence of this. Now that some of you have
upgraded your DWWMs I am relying on you guys to take care of the
storms for me from now on. I have purposefully left my machine
off now for almost two months while constantly monitoring the
weather and I see a few very powerful machines at work out
there. I must congratulate those who are dedicating themselves
to this great task of keeping humanity safe from bad weather
because I know how time consuming this work can be. I thank you,
and humanity thanks you.
My machine will not be able to affect Atlantic tropical
storms and/or hurricanes as effectively any more because I have
moved to the US west coast.
We have many good and experienced machine operators, some of
you with many more years of experience than myself. I ask you to
please make your knowledge available to other operators and
teach us anything new that you may come across.
I hope that that the World Meteorological Organization, the
Bill Gates Foundation or a similar entity will take interest in
our work and help us further develop this science.
I will remain always at your service and available through
e-mail to answer any questions you may have as best I can.
Best wishes,
Alberto
|
A few days prior, he had written:
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:03 PM
Subject: Tropical Storm Gabrielle dissolved
Hi everybody:
Beautiful work, well done guys! You know who you are. Thank you!
Alberto |
Here's a report from June.
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "david wells"
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 8:36 AM
Subject: Great Test Results for Machine Improvement
Hi Everybody, Hi David:
The more I work with your Weather Machine the more I like it.
It truly is an inspired invention. Thank you for sharing it with
me and with the world.
As you know I made a few changes to the machine you built for
me, and the machine is now much more powerful. I have tested
your machine using only 12V as power input and the resulting
effects have been amazing. The best part about these changes is
that they are so simple that anyone can do them without need of
specialized tools.
These important changes include:
1.) Use a Bifilar coil instead of the normal coil. This alone
will boost your machine's output thousands of times. Example:
The calculated output for my weather machine using a normal coil
and working at 12 Volts is 8.8 Watts output. My new Bifilar coil
at 12 Volts is calculated as producing 23,923.56 Watts output
(see satellite weather
image below on my North-to-South test-run
and see also table pic attached below).
2.) I have completely covered one side of the machine with a
thin aluminum sheet (I chose the side on the machine without the
points). The sheet covers the entire area of the coil and the
total area of the spinning rotor. This creates what has been
called a "compound shaded pole" and makes the machine totally
directional. See the
attached Pdf.
Notes:
a.) The machine will now run much faster than before, making it
necessary to slow it down by opening the points a bit. The
points on my machine are finely adjusted so that very little
contact is made during any rotor revolution. As a consequence
only one of the two rotor's passes makes electrical contact and
the machine runs at about 100 rpm. I had noticed this before and
it is why I liked what I called a "hurricane cam" so much. I
suggest that the cam used for the points be built so that the
points make contact only once per revolution.
b.) My machine's power source is a 12V mains transformer. I
have not yet run tests using only a car battery, so test results
may (or may not) vary when using a 12V car battery as power
source. This can be overcome by either building a simple 12V
oscillator circuit or by using an inverter to power the 12V
mains transformer. The latter is preferable for those of us not
technically gifted.
c.) It is important to use an FBWR and not just a diode for
Batt2. I have found that this directly affects the machine's
performance.
Take care and have fun,
Alberto
|
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:36 PM
Subject: Hurricane Hunting Season is Over
Hi all: Hurricane Sandy has killed many people and destroyed a
lot of property much to our sorrow; it appears to be set to do
more damage in the next few days. My location on the Planet with
respect to the Sun seems to limit the time frame during which my
machine works at a high power level. A machine operator located
on or close to the Equator right now would be able to dissolve
Hurricane Sandy easily (see pic below).
The
past four years of machine operation have taught me that the
machine's high-power season at my present location (18N) is
approximately from Apr 15 thru Oct 15. The rest of the year it
will affect mostly local weather. I noticed almost the same
effect during the time I lived at 27N when my machine would work
effectively only during the last few weeks of July. This seems
to indicate that the machine's power level is related to the
location of the machine on the Planet in respect its alignment
to the center of Earth and the Sun. It seems to be limited to
about 6 degrees difference distance from the tropical zones. A
machine located on the Equator should work all year long. Having
a machine operator travel with his machine to a country along
the Equatorial line would allow weather modification all-year
long as needed.
I feel certain that with further development these machines
will be able to operate at full power from any latitude or
longitude. Proper funding would allow a few dedicated Scientists
to research and develop this wonderful machine. Then these
first-generation machines we are working with now will be
considered archaic.
I have done the best that I can with what I've got.
Dissolving Hurricane Sandy was out of my hands, and, as always,
God is still in control.
- - - -
A note about a previous update: additional tests I have done
have demonstrated that some of what I wrote earlier about
selecting a capacitor for your Weather Machine is incomplete.
The Natural Frequency part is correct but not its
implementation, and a few apparently minor but important details
have been left out. I will try to correct that here.
The purpose of adding a capacitor to the machine is not about
creating a tank circuit but about getting the maximum output
from the coil. The way to choose the correct capacitor for a
Weather Machine is by first calculating the machine coil's
Natural Frequency (the speed of light divided by the coil's wire
length) and then creating and feeding that frequency as pulsed
DC to the coil as the input.
The coil's BEMF always vibrates at the coil's Natural
Frequency but providing power as above described gives it much
more power. This proved to be true while working with Hurricane
Paul (2012) in the eastern Pacific a few days ago.
I will use approximations in the following calculations.
My coil's wire length is 500 meters. The speed of light
(300,000,000 m/s) divided by the coil's wire length gives me
600,000 Hz.
300,000,000 m/s / 500 m = 600,000 Hz.
That is my coil's Natural Frequency. I have placed 200
microfarads capacitance (a 2200 uF and a 220 uF capacitor in
series) across the pulsed DC input (at 120 Hz) just before the
points so that when the points open the capacitors are also
disconnected from the coil.
120 Hz / 0.0002 F = 600,000 Hz.
I hope this info is helpful. Please write if you have any
questions.
Alberto
|
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 7:03 AM
Subject: I Love My Wind Shear Machine. Don't You?
Paul pulls its punch before hitting Baja; Rafael brushes Bermuda
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 12:31 PM GMT on October 17, 2012
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=2263
Hurricane Paul weakened rapidly just before landfall on
Mexico's Baja coast on Tuesday evening, as wind shear of 30 - 40
knots tore into the storm. Paul peaked as a Category 3 hurricane
with 120 mph winds at 2 pm PDT on Monday, but was just a
tropical storm with 60 mph winds Tuesday evening when the center
finally reached the coast of Baja. Paul hit a region of coast
that is very sparsely populated, and I expect damage from the
weakening storm was relatively light. Rainfall amounts of 2 - 3"
were common over Baja from Paul, but there have been no reports
of damaging flooding thus far.
|
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 6:42 AM
Subject: WM Update
Weather Machine Update:
A few days ago I explained how a capacitor placed across the
coil would give the machine great power. But each machine is
different and the capacitor size will vary from one machine to
the next. Using the wrong size cap may keep your machine from
working at all. So I will explain how to choose the appropriate
cap for your machine. This is how you do it (please remember the
capacitor must be bipolar): Divide the Input Voltage by the
Natural Frequency of your machine's coil. This will give you the
correct capacitor size.
Example (I will use actual numbers): Say we have a coil which
has a wire length of 483.7 meters. To find its Natural Frequency
we will divide the speed of light (299000000 meters) by the wire
length (483.7 meters). That will give us 618151.747 Hz, or 618
kHz. We will next divide the Input Voltage by that frequency.
Suppose we are using 45V.
Then 45V divided by 618000 Hz equals 0.0000728 farads, or
72.8uf. Either a 73uf bipolar capacitor or a capacitor bank
adding to 73uf will work.
The above calculations should work for any coil which is to
be used in an OverUnity circuit.
Let me know if I may be of help in upgrading your machine. It
may take me a while to get to your email so please be patient
for replies.
Alberto
- - - -
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 4:02 PM
Subject: WM Update 19Sep12 - only capacitor: apparently nothing
else needed
Hi All
I have noticed that any machine can be made a super machine
by only adding a bipolar capacitor across the coil. Nothing else
is needed. With the correct capacitor the coil becomes Naturally
Resonant and uses very little Amperage.
Each machine uses a different size capacitor. The correct
capacitor size can be calculated by dividing the speed of light
by the coil's wire length first to get the coil's Natural
Frequency and then dividing the voltage to be used by that
frequency. The result is the correct size for the capacitor.
Your machine will then be very powerful even working from a 12V
car battery, no other additions needed.
Alberto
|
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "wmo"; "david wells"
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 7:08 AM
1000 GMT, 05/Sep/2012.
Hi Operators et al:
Our bad experience with Hurricane Isaac (2012) has led me to
do a bit of fine-tuning of my machine with Tropical Storm Leslie
(2012). I have been making Leslie wobble and dance at almost the
same spot for the last few days and I am trying all sort of
things to see if I can make it roll-over and play dead. So far
she's only learned to dance, sit and stay.
I often try the once-an-hour Push-Pull technique. That
creates geometric shapes in the hurricane's cloud pattern and it
also seems to change all surrounding humidity patterns for
thousands of miles around. Humidity seems to be pulled into my
area and redistributed North and South from here at 30 degrees
following the Yellow Arrow (towards Leslie). It also seems to
keep other tropical systems from developing. I will share how I
am doing this below.
I want to thank all of you with your recent help on the
storms. Even with all our hard work we still lost the battle
with Hurricane Isaac. Lives and property were lost. The Full
Moon phase had a lot to do with it (it "weakens" our machines)
but I am sure that this problem will eventually be overcome.
It is not easy Pioneering a new field like Weather
Engineering where so much is at stake. It seems that the only
way to learn what works and what doesn't is by trial and error,
and by applying hind-sight, correcting possible causes to past
technological problems. Additionally, we cannot find out how to
weaken hurricanes until they show up so that we may work with
them, and then its a RUSH situation to make adjustments to our
machines to get it right before the hurricane does any damage.
Unfortunately it is not always possible to make major changes to
our machines in the few hours that it takes a hurricane to make
landfall.
The information I am about to share here is very powerful. I
am sharing it because it may help save countless lives and
property all over the world and it must not be suppressed. Too
many lives depend on this technology for it to be kept secret
for the exclusive financial gain of any one individual. Neither
does it belong in the secret weapons arsenal of any one
'special' Country or Nation. The information on how to build
this life-saving device belongs to the People and the technology
belongs in the hands of the United Nations World Meteorological
Organization so that humanity may benefit as a whole. As I have
been saying since 2009, David Wells' Weather Machines are
Weather Engineering tools and belong in the hands of Atmospheric
Scientists. Getting these machines into their hands is our goal.
Hurricanes and storms keep moving so we have to keep on
re-aiming our machines, always aware that the satellite image we
are looking at may be up to an hour old and it shows us only
where the storm 'was' and how it looked an hour ago. When you
take aim and hit your target it may take three hours or more for
the effects to appear on the satellite image (the effects are
cummulative and are explained by the Standing Wave theory) and
again you will see those effects with a one hour delay which
means a total of about four hours after you aimed. Aiming then
needs to be done thinking ahead of the present hour so that the
effects by the hour be seen three hours later with an added hour
of image delay. Interesting, eh?
A few e-mails ago I sent you a Tesla article that explained
how circuit capacitance is altered by phases of the Moon, by the
Sun and by altitude among other things. The solution then to our
Moon problem is simple: make it easy to vary the machine's
capacitance. There are many ways to do that but I have chosen to
put taps on my machine's coil for the effect.
Here are a few essentials in a nutshell:
- We need to have a few taps on our machine's coil so that we
may vary its output.
- About 45 V at 1 Amp minimum of pulsed DC are needed to operate
the machine.
- A relay wired as a buzzer needs to be placed in series with
the machine's points for added power.
- A 400 uf bipolar capacitor needs to be placed across the coil
to raise your machine's output to true hydroxyl molecule clumps
(water vapor) vibration levels.
- The charging circuit needs to be altered so that the batteries
charge slower.
- - - -
Here are a few of the details:
- The single radio frequency at which hydroxyl molecule clumps
characteristically absorb and emit energy is 1.667 GHz. A coil
needs to be tuned to hurricanes to be able to work with them,
but hurricanes vary pressure at different altitudes and that
creates special circumstances for hydroxyl molecule clumps. The
top of a hurricane is what must be dealt with first to tame it.
Hurricane tops seem to respond to a 60 Hz harmonic. That would
happen only if the hydroxyl clumps expand a bit, say to about
1.111111 times their normal size because of low atmospheric
pressure at that high altitude. It may also be due to freezing.
That changes their resonant frequency enough to make them
unresponsive to 1.667 GHz but they will react to 1.5 GHz instead
which is one-quarter wave-length harmonic of 60 Hz (an
interesting note here: Nikola Tesla affirmed that 60 Hz was a
compatible wave-length distance along the circumference of our
Planet, one of Nature's measuring sticks). Having taps on our
coils allows us to switch to that new frequency to "chop" off a
hurricane's corona. The taps also allow us to compensate for the
capacitance fluctuations normally caused by Mother Nature. I
have four taps on my machine's coil.
Tuning for the hurricane's corona is reached at 498.333
meters wire-length (600 KHz). Here is how I understand it: the
Earth and individual atmospheric water molecule clumps interact
with each other in very much the same way that a properly tuned
transformer's Primary and Secondary coils do. Earth will act as
the reactor coil (L1) and water vapor as the reactant coil (L2).
The relationship between water vapor (1.667 GHz) and the Earth
(6.667 Hz as given by Nikola Tesla) is proportionally correct
and they interact harmonically despite their size difference. In
a properly tuned transformer, L1 is one-quarter the wire-length
of L2. If you measure the L1 independently from the L2 you will
find that it resonates at 4 times the frequency of L2; that is
as it should be. If you divide the speed of light by the above
frequencies you will notice that 1.667 covers four times the
distance of 6.667.
I have also had visible results for different weather
conditions with other tuning frequencies; this has led me to
place several taps on my weather machine's coil. My coil's total
wire-length is now 523.25 meters. Taps are placed at:
=> 523.25 meters (571.428 KHz) for extremely powerful
hurricanes (experimental).
=> 498.333 meters (600 KHz) for hurricanes.
=> 473.417 meters (631.578 KHz) for thunderstorms
(experimental).
=> 448.5 meters (666.667 KHz) for atmospheric humidity and
normal rain clouds.
- The charging side of the machine needs to be modified so
that the batteries receive less charge. This is done by
replacing the FWBR with three diodes in parallel (they must be
placed so that they separate the original common negative
connection between battery 1 and battery 2) and then reversing
polarity on the Battery 2 cables. Note:
I use 3 car batteries in parallel in the Batt 2 position but
this may not be necessary. It is possible that just one battery
may be enough.
Three batteries have always worked for me in the past so I'll
use 3 batteries for now.
- Taps may be substituted by using the appropriate capacitor
if you have it.
- Pulsed DC as input power is a must. It is necessary that
the input power be pulsed DC, not just DC from a normal
lead/acid car battery. This may be done in any number of ways
but the easiest is using a mains power transformer. Get one with
at least 1 Amp output. Raise the voltage while you are at it
too: use around 45 V DC. If you live in an area where power
outages happen regularly then play it safe and get an inverter
(an inexpensive 150 Watt inverter works fine).
Raising the battery's voltage with an inverter only to lower
it again with a mains transformer may seem like a waste of time
but I assure you that it is not. We all know that Volts
multiplied by Amps equals Watts (power). What many people don't
know is that in a properly tuned coil the Watts get multiplied
by the frequency too. A little battery energy appears to be
wasted by using an inverter but the machine's power output is
multiplied 120 times (alternating current is 60 Hz in the US,
and mains transformers usually use FWBR that will pulse at
double that amount). The result is a powerful machine. Note: If
you are going to use a car battery to power an inverter during a
hurricane then it may be a good idea to have several charged
batteries on hand.
- A good quality automobile relay wired as a buzzer and
placed in-line with the points will multiply the power output
anywhere from 10 to 100 times, depending on the machine's rpm
speed. The points on the cheap ones don't last very long. Good
quality relays sell for about three times the price of a cheap
one (keep a spare handy too). Instead of two machine output
bursts per rotation you will get 20 to 200 bursts per rotation,
depending on rpms.
A 400 uf bipolar capacitor placed across the coil will raise
your machine's output 2500 times and will bring it to true
hydroxyl (water vapor) vibration levels. Your machine's
frequency output will now be working between 1.5 to 1.667 GHz
depending on the tap setting you use.
If you do this you need to enclose your machine in a
metal-grounded box to keep it from emiting illegal radio
frequencies. Enclosing the machine in a grounded metal container
should not affect its performance.
Look at the difference:
I.) Normal Machine: [12V] multiplied by [1Amp] = 12 Watts/bursts
output.
II.) Modified Machine: [45V] multiplied by [1Amp] multiplied
by [120 Hz] multiplied by [at least 10 extra bursts] multiplied
by 2500 [the 400 uf cap] = 135,000,000 Watts/bursts output.
Does this sound difficult to believe? My experience working
with the weather and seeing the way huge amounts of water vapor
and wind move around at my machine's will in whatever direction
I point it to is enough to convince me that the above
calculations are correct. This is the work of static
electricity.
All motor coils produce Back-electromotive-force (BEMF), also
known as sparks or static electricity. David Wells' machine is a
DC pulse motor that uses the BEMF produced by the coil and puts
it to work charging a battery. That is nothing new as there are
many inventions already doing that. What is unique about David's
machine is that the static electricity circles around in the
uniquely shaped pancake coil and emits a "static electricity
magnetic field" which is directionally oriented by rotating bar
magnets. Clouds are attracted or repeled by that static
electricity magnetic field and they follow it but only if the
coil producing it is tuned to the proper frequency.
As you already know, we may eliminate minor storms and create
rain at the same time by switching the machine's direction
around East and West once an hour (thats the Yellow-Arrow
pointing East and West). The once-an-hour Push/Pull Boogie is a
new switching technique that has proven to be very effective. It
also makes hurricanes display interesting geometric patterns. I
have noticed square cloud patterns and lines inside the
hurricane whenever I switch directions, as I am sure most of you
watching the huricane have too.
Trevor Constable tells us that in the more northern
lattitudes rain may be created by doing the switching in the
North-South direction (he uses 5 minute switching periods with
his passive equipment). I believe that he is right.
I have experimented with a number of variations of the
switching used for rain which include different time periods and
whether or not to use the Sweeper during the switching including
combinations of both. Up to now no method has proven to be more
effective than just pointing the machine and switching every
hour. Full-blown hurricanes are the exception and need many
hours of direct Yellow Arrow attention.
We need our work to be brought to the attention of the
general public because it is the Public who benefits most from
this device. A Scientist cannot acknowledge that a small
electric motor may affect the weather without being scoffed at
by his/her peers. Any Scientist even suggesting that it is
possible would be putting at risk his or her reputation and may
even lose his/her livelihood.
Public Opinion will sway our country's leaders to encourage
(ie. order) Scientists to examine our machines in Research
Science Labs everywhere. Scientists may then relax knowing that
they will not be laughed at by their peers for examining a
"weather machine" if they have been ordered to do so (even one
that they may have secretly been wanting to study all along). I
expect by this time that many countries will create scientific
investigation teams to study this machine. One or more of these
groups will find out how it works and will surely improve it to
amazing levels.
Do you have any ideas that may help us with any of the above?
Please write and let me know.
Alberto
|
Update:
From: "Alberto Feliciano"
To: "Sterling D. Allan"
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:57 PM
Subject: David Wells Machine New Pic
Hi Sterling
Thank you for the page on our offer to the WMO. You do
wonderful work, Sterling. God bless you.
Here is the pic I promised. [...]
About the capacitors I used on the machine... they don't
work. All that was part of the research and development done
during the "initial" or "experimental" phase of the machine. The
final version needs no capacitors and is tuned solely by
total-circuit-wire-length. Not even the "hurricane cam" had any
real effect except to slow down the machine a bit, which is
sometimes useful. So David's original design stands with the
only important things to keep in mind being wire-length and the
aluminum plate on the side of the machine for the
compound-shaded-pole effect. That was all that was needed.
Take care and have fun! Your friend,
Alberto
|
For those of you who have been tracking this over these four years,
as well as for those of you who have taken the time to read up on the
past developments to come up to date on this, I'd like to take a
poll of what your
opinion is of the work of Albert, Dave, and the other Weather Rangers.
As you know, I'm a pretty easy sell for a fascinating story, and it
seems that the actual weather events bear out validation of what these
guys are saying.
# # #
Site:
Contact:
David Wells
phone: +1-641-426-9433
e-mail <davidwells3 {at} gmail.com>
Alberto Feliciano
email: <alfelici {at} googlemail.com>
www.pureenergysystems.com
PES Network, Inc.
Copyright © 2003 - 2013
http://pesn.com/2013/10/06/9602379_Hurricane-control-methodology-offered-to-World-Meteorological-Organization/
|