Geothermal heat pumps are sold to customers as a way to save on utility bills but that is not what happened in this case.  In fact, over the past 6 years, his electricity usage and costs have skyrocketed.  Today he uses more than three times the amount of electricity he used to use before making any changes to his system.  On average in 2008, he was using 982 kWh per month and paying $101 per month ($0.10 per kWh).  In 2013, his average monthly usage had gone to 3128 kWh and he was paying $328 per month ($0.095 per kWh because he switched to a new electricity provider).

Here’s his initial email:

Folks, I purchased a looped system in August 2008 and two years later bought an 80-gallon electric water heater connected to the GHP. 

My electricity consumption has risen dramatically since the purchase of both the geothermal system and the water heater.  In this time frame, my wife and I became empty nesters which further causes my concern with the electrify use.  Additionally, we keep the internal temperature very low in the winter months, no higher than 64 degrees.  During the months where there is no need to heat or AC, the electric use is higher than before the GHP and water heater were installed. 

I’ve had the installer to my home on several occasions and they say the system is working as designed.  I’m confused and concerned and not pleased with my purchase.   Help…please!

The newsroom was intrigued with this question and decided to take it on.  While we don’t sell or install GHP or electric water heater systems, we certainly know folks who do that exact thing.  So we collected some additional data from our reader, who keeps fastidious records, and forwarded it to Chris Williams of Heatspring.  Here’s what he had to say: 

Almost any building science problem is impossible to answer virtually and this situation is no different. While I won't be able to answer the question with certainty because there are too many "what ifs," I'll walk through the thought process that I would use if a good friend or relative were having this problem.

Did the installation company make a mistake or is his usage normal and to be expected?

The answer is that both are possible. The installation company could have made a mistake or the system could be operating well. The problem is that simply having the electricity use and a spot check of the system performance, from the same installer that did the work, doesn't provide enough information to eliminate all of the "what ifs?" when trying to diagnose a potential problem.

Is he saving on his heating costs?

To try and answer this question, I did some back-of-the-napkin analysis.

If he were paying $150/month for propane at $1.30/gallon in the 2007 timeframe, that would be $423/month at today's prices in Ohio ($3.67/gal), all else equal, assuming the same weather and temperature settings.

Source: EIA US Energy Information Administration

This means that when he first installed his system, he was likely saving a small amount of money on his heating when compared with his propane bill. The homeowner said he was paying $150/month for propane, and if we deduce the average geothermal kWh use it would be around $138/month, a savings of $12/month. In today’s dollars, the price of geo is 1/3 the cost of propane, so he would save $3,000 per year.

The good news is that it appears his system is saving him a lot of money with the spike in propane prices. Given that there is a propane shortage in Ohio, it's good that he made the switch.

When investigating operating costs for heating systems, it is necessary to examine the cost per million BTU (MMBTU). When propane is very cheap and electricity is relatively cheap, geothermal heat pumps will only save a small amount versus propane. In Ohio during 2007, electricity cost around $.10/kWh and propane around $1.30 per gallon. In this scenario, geothermal won't save much, about $2 per MMBTU. Thus, if you had a house that required 100 MMBTU per heating system, the geo system would only save $200 at those prices.

The advantage of a geothermal heat pump is that the prices do not fluctuate rapidly — there is value in stability.

Today, with electricity around $.11/kWh and propane around $3.67/gal, geothermal is saving a lot of cash, around $22 per MMBTU.

Given the propane system was 80 percent efficient, the geothermal system operated at a coefficient of performance (COP) of 3.5 in heating mode. You can see data taken from 100,000 hours of real time monitoring of actual geothermal COPs here.

This graph assumes a few critical elements that we don’t have information on from the homeowner:

1. It only looks at heating. When you consider cooling, this will increase kWh usage more and it's then impossible to compare to propane because you can't cool with propane.
2. This assumes the geothermal system is operating at an average heating COP of 3.5. If it's not operating properly, it will be operating much lower.
3. The expected savings from geothermal assumes that the heating degree (how cold it is outside and thus how much heating is required) and the temperature set point within the home (if the thermostat is at 65°F versus 72°F) is the same for the comparison years. The system could be much more expensive if it's colder outside and the heating set point is set much higher than it was with the propane system. Increasing the set point with geothermal is common. When dealing with propane, an expensive fuel source, homeowners will often set their homes to 65°F or less to save money. When they have a cheap heating source, homeowners will often turn it up to 72°F or higher during the winter. 

The problem with this situation might have been simple over-promising or miscommunication of the savings on geothermal when the price of propane was cheap. Secondly, it sounds like the installer did a poor job at explaining how much their electricity use would increase, since heat pumps use electricity. 

More:  http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/02/ask-the-expert-do-ground-source-heat-pumps-raise-your-electricity-use?page=2

 

© Copyright 1999-2014 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved. RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information