By Dr. Mercola
While Congress has never banned raw milk outright, it is the
only food banned in interstate commerce. This makes it
challenging (though not impossible) for small farmers to share
their raw milk products with people living across state lines.
As a result, private agreements called herdshares are often
formed between farmers and individuals, which entitle you to the
benefits of owning a “share” of a cow, such as a certain amount
of milk each week.
Despite these legal agreements, and the fact that many
Americans choose to drink raw milk of their own free volition,
aggressive armed raids by federal agents against
raw-milk farmers are not uncommon.
Armed Raids Against Amish Raw-Milk Farmers?
In the video above, Liz Reitzig, co-founder of the Farm Food
Freedom Coalition, explains the absurdity of holding an armed
raid against a peaceful culture such as the Amish (who by
definition do not use violence).
One of the most glaring cases involves
Wisconsin dairy farmer Vernon Hershberger, who was charged
with four criminal misdemeanors for supplying a private
buying club with raw milk and other fresh produce grown on his
farm.
State prosecutors tried to convict Hershberger for operating
a retail food establishment, a dairy farm and a dairy plant
without a license. However, since he only supplies food to paid
members in a private buying club, he maintained that he was not
subject to state food regulations.
The trial has become a symbol for the war being waged against
raw milk in the US, where aggressive regulators are attacking
small farmers producing wholesome raw food products for loyal
customers.
Fortunately, the trial ended mostly favorably for
Hershberger, but not before his peaceful farm was raided using
military-style tactics (at one point he was subjected to three
raids in a three-month period!).
Several of the jurors were so moved by the case that they now
want to join Hershberger’s buying club to be able to access raw
milk for their families, noting that this is an issue of food
freedom. Unfortunately, armed federal agents have and
will continue to storm through small farms and barns,
confiscating milk cartons and computers under the guise of
protecting your health, unless drastic legislative changes are
made.
Two New Raw Milk Bills Could Protect Farmers from Federal Raids
While Allowing Food Freedom
A bipartisan coalition of 20 lawmakers has plans to introduce
a series of “food freedom” bills this year. The first two to be
released could be a major step forward in the raw milk movement:
- The Milk Freedom Act of 2014 (HR 4307):
The bill would prohibit the federal government from
interfering with the interstate traffic of raw milk
products, offering relief for small farmers who have been
harassed, fined, or prosecuted for distributing raw milk.
- The Interstate Milk Freedom Act of 2014 (HR
4308): This bill would prevent the federal
government from interfering with trade of unpasteurized
natural milk or milk products between states where
distribution or sale of such products is already legal.
To date, both bills have been referred to the Subcommittee on
Health. Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky explained that the
bills are intended to improve consumer food choices while
protecting local farmers from federal interference:1
“As a producer of grass-fed beef, I am familiar with
some of the difficulties small farmers face when marketing
fresh food directly to consumers. Our bills would make it
easier for families to buy wholesome milk directly from
farmers by reversing the criminalization of dairy farmers
who offer raw milk.
The federal government should not punish farmers for
providing customers the foods they want, and states should
be free to set their own laws regulating food safety.”
Representative Chellie Pingree added:2
“Many consumers want to buy fresh, unpasteurized milk
and regulations shouldn't get between them and the farmer
who wants to sell it. Given how many food scares there have
been involving large-scale producers,
It just doesn't make sense to spend money cracking down on
small, local farmers who are producing natural, raw milk and
cheese. The enforcement of raw milk regulations has been
overzealous and needs to be reined in."
High-Quality Raw Milk: Dangerous to Big Dairy But Not to
Consumers
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
commonly warns against drinking raw milk, citing numerous
“outbreaks” linked to the product. But drinking
raw milk produced by
grass-fed cows from clean, well-run farms is actually far LESS
dangerous than drinking pasteurized milk. In fact, not only does
raw milk contain beneficial bacteria that are essential for a
healthy digestive system, raw milk also offers protection
against disease-causing bacteria.
CDC data show there are about 412 confirmed cases of people
getting ill from pasteurized milk each year, while only
about 116 illnesses a year are linked to raw milk.3
Even as the CDC continues to report on raw milk dangers, the
state of Arkansas has announced that no illnesses have
been caused as a result of a recent
increase in raw milk sales.
Meanwhile, the CDC stays silent about the proven health
benefits linked to raw milk, like the GABRIELA study, which
found school-aged children who drank raw milk were 41 percent
less likely to develop asthma and about 50 percent less likely
to develop hay fever than children who drank store-bought
(pasteurized) milk.4
Eventually, as the numbers of raw milk dairies increase, and so
too do their happy customers, the CDC may be forced to change
its tune, but for now they stay silent, in large part because
raw milk is a threat to the industrial dairy industry.
Raw Milk Is Making a Comeback Among ‘Discerning’ Consumers
Raw milk has been gaining popularity for years now. The
conventional dairy industry, realizing this, has redoubled their
efforts to make sure that raw milk sales are not able to grow,
and certainly not able to become mainstream, where they could
begin to threaten their very own livelihoods. If raw dairy
really caught on, you would think that the dairy industry would
simply follow suit and begin producing raw products to meet the
demand. But this would be virtually impossible.
Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) cannot compete
with a small organic, free-range farm because their entire
business depends on the milk being pasteurized. In CAFOs, large
groups of animals are kept in a small space, oftentimes without
natural light or access to the outdoors. The conditions are
filthy, with animals standing in one another's waste. Needless
to say, harmful pathogenic bacteria naturally thrive in these
conditions.
As a result, drinking CAFO milk raw would be extremely
dangerous. It must be pasteurized for safety. On the
other hand, milk from grass-fed cows raised on smaller, clean
farms can be safely consumed without being pasteurized, provided
the farmer is committed to providing a safe, quality product.
Most commercial dairy factory “farms’” simply cannot afford
to reproduce the conditions required to produce safe raw milk,
such as allowing all the cows to pasture and graze on grass, for
starters. So, since big business can't produce what consumers
want, they're simply seeking to eliminate the raw milk market
altogether. This is why Big Dairy's powerful lobbyists will stop
at nothing to persuade government agencies to keep raw milk bans
in full force.
But what they haven’t factored in is the power of personal
freedom and choice… and as increasing numbers of Americans
demand healthier, more natural food from actual farms, not
factories, they are moving proverbial mountains and prompting
real legislative change, not just in the realm of raw milk but
in many facets of food quality and freedom. Congressman Massie
concluded:5
“Today, many people are paying more attention to the
foods they eat, what it contains, and how it is processed.
Raw milk, which has been with us for thousands of years, is
making a comeback among these discerning consumers. Personal
choices as basic as ‘what we feed our families’ should not
be limited by the federal government.”
Noted Differences Revealed Between Pasteurized and Raw Milk
Public health agencies are quick to say that there are no
nutritional differences between raw and pasteurized milk, but
research suggests otherwise. The GABRIELA researchers believed
that the beneficial asthma effect may have been due to whey
proteins, including bovine serum albumin (BSA) and
alpha-lactalbumin, in the raw milk, which were destroyed by the
heating process in the pasteurized milk. While the study didn't
find an association between any health outcomes and the
bacterial contents of the milk, it did demonstrate
noted differences between raw and pasteurized varieties, which
the CDC continues to deny. Additionally, high-quality raw milk
has a mountain of health benefits that pasteurized milk lacks.
For example, raw milk is:
- Loaded with healthy bacteria that are good for your
gastrointestinal tract
- Full of more than 60 digestive enzymes, growth factors,
and immunoglobulins (antibodies)
- Rich in conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which fights
cancer and boosts metabolism
- Rich in beneficial raw fats, amino acids, and proteins
in a highly bioavailable form, all 100 percent digestible
- Loaded with vitamins (A, B, C, D, E, and K) in highly
bioavailable forms, and a very balanced blend of minerals
(calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and iron) whose absorption
is enhanced by live lactobacilli
Keep in mind that, as with any food, the quality of your raw
milk is only as good as the quality of its source. Even if you
know your raw milk is coming from a small, local farm it would
be very wise to visit the farm in person. Look around and ask
questions about the following general conditions, which should
indicate a source of high-quality raw milk.
|
Low pathogenic bacteria count (i.e. does the farmer test
his milk regularly for pathogens?) |
The milk comes from cows raised naturally, in accordance
with the seasons |
The cows are not given antibiotics and growth hormones
to increase milk production |
|
The milk is quickly chilled after milking |
The cows are mainly grass-fed |
Cows are well cared for |
Join the Fight for Food Freedom
The fight for food freedom isn’t just for those who love raw
milk – it’s for everyone who wants to be able to obtain the food
of their choice from the source of their choice. Raw milk isn’t
the only food on the chopping block. Raw-milk cheeses and
heritage-breed pigs are also being targeted, and there’s no
telling what other small-farm, niche foods may be next. So
please, get involved! I urge you to embrace the following action
plan to protect your right to choose your own foods:
- Ask your government representatives to vote YES
on both HB 4307 and HB 4308 in support of food freedom of
choice.
Sign the petition now.
- Get informed: Visit
www.farmtoconsumer.org or
click here to sign up for action alerts.
- Join the fight for your rights: The
Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF) is the only
organization of its kind. This 501(c)(4) nonprofit
organization provides a legal defense for farmers who are
being pursued by the government for distributing foods
directly to consumers.
Your
donations, although not tax deductible, will be used to
support the litigation, legislative, and lobbying efforts of
the FTCLDF.
- Support your local farmers: Buy from
local farmers, not the industry that is working with the
government to take away your freedom.
Copyright 1997- 2014 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.