Vaccination: Defending Your Right to
Know and Freedom to Choose
November 13, 2014
Story at-a-glance
-
Discussion about freedom to choose how we want to maintain
our physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual health is one
of the most important public conversations of our time
-
134 references included
-
At stake in this debate is: who will control the
multi-trillion dollar US health care system?
-
If people have the right to know and freedom to choose how
to heal and stay healthy, they may opt to spend their money
on something other than what they’re told to spend their
money on now
Following is an excerpt from a keynote
presentation given by Barbara Loe Fisher at the 2014 US Health Freedom
Congress in Minneapolis, Minnesota. View the video of her full 75 minute
presentation here or on NVIC.org.
By Barbara Loe Fisher
Co-founder & President, National Vaccine
Information Center
The public conversation about whether we should have the freedom
to choose how we want to maintain our physical, mental, emotional,
and spiritual health has become one of the most important public
conversations of our time.
It is a conversation that challenges us to examine complex public
policy, scientific, ethical, legal, philosophical, economic,
political, and cultural issues.
This may appear to be a new conversation but it has been around
for centuries.1
At the center of this new and old public conversation about health
and freedom, is the topic of vaccination.2,
3
What unites those defending an open discussion about vaccination
and health is a commitment to protecting bodily integrity4,
5 and defending the inalienable right to
self-determination,6
which has been globally acknowledged as a human right.7,
8,
9
Whether you are a health care professional practicing
complementary and alternative medicine or specializing in
homeopathic, naturopathic, chiropractic, acupuncture, or other
holistic health options,10
or you are a consumer advocate working for the right to know and
freedom to choose how you and your family will stay well, many of
you have a deep concern about health and freedom.
Vaccination: Most Hotly Debated of All Health Freedom Issues
The most divisive and hotly debated of all health freedom issues
is the question of whether individuals should be at liberty to
dissent from established medical and government health policy and
exercise freedom of thought, speech, and conscience when it comes to
vaccination.11,
12,
13
In the health freedom movement, there are some who will defend
the legal right to purchase and use nutritional supplements, drink
raw milk, eat GMO-free food, remove fluoride from public water
systems and mercury from dental amalgams, or choose non-medical
model options for healing and staying well, but are reluctant to
publicly support the legal right to make vaccine choices.
A Sacrosanct Status for Vaccination
Vaccination is a medical procedure that has been elevated to a
sacrosanct status by those in control of the medical-model based
health care system for the past two centuries. Vaccination is now
being proclaimed as the most important scientific discovery and
public health intervention in the history of medicine.14,
15,
16
Using religious symbols and crusading language, medical
scientists describe vaccination as the Holy Grail.17,
18,
19,
20 Vaccines, they say, are going to eradicate all causes
of sickness and death from the earth and anyone who doubts that is
an ignorant fool.21,
22,
23,
24,
25
In the 1970s, pediatrician and health freedom pioneer Robert
Mendelsohn, who described himself as a medical heretic, warned that
medical science has become a religion and doctors have turned the
act of vaccination into “the new sacrament.”26
In the 21st century, if you refuse to believe that vaccination is
a moral and civic duty and dare to question vaccine safety or
advocate for the legal right to decline one or more government
recommended vaccines.
You are in danger of being branded an anti-science heretic, a
traitor, and a threat to the public health.27,
28 You are viewed as a person of interest who deserves to
be humiliated, silenced, and punished for your dissent.29,
30,
31,
32
Exercising Freedom of Thought, Speech, and Autonomy
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not
allowed to criticize,” said Voltaire,33,
34 the great 18th century writer during the Age of
Enlightenment, who was imprisoned several times in the Bastille for
defending freedom of thought and speech before the French
Revolution.
As contentious as the public conversation about vaccination,
health, and autonomy has become, we cannot be afraid to have it.
There has never been a better time to challenge those ruling our
health care with an iron fist. We have the power and all we need to
do is exercise it.
Information Is Power
We have the tools in the 21st century to bring about a modern Age
of Enlightenment35
that will liberate the people so we can take back our freedom and
our health.
The electronic communications revolution has provided a global
platform for us to access the Library of Medicine36
and evaluate the quality and quantity of vaccine science used to
make public health policy and create vaccine laws.
The World Wide Web allows us to circumvent the paid mainstream
media dominated by industry and governments and publicly communicate
in detail on our computers, tablets, and smart phones exactly what
happened to our health or our child’s health after vaccination.37,
38,
39,
40
We are connected with each other in a way that we have never been
before and it is time to talk about vaccines and microbes and the
true causes of poor health.
It is time to face the fear that we and our children will get
sick and die if we don’t believe and do what those we have allowed
to rule our health care system with an iron fist tell us to believe
and do.
Who Will Control the Multi-Trillion Dollar US Health Care System?
What is at stake in this debate between citizens challenging the
status quo and those resisting constructive change is: who will
control the multi-trillion dollar US health care system?41
If people have the right to know and freedom to choose how to
heal and stay healthy, a free people may think independently and
choose to spend their money on something different from what they
have been carefully taught to spend their money on right now.42
A free people may reject sole reliance on the expensive and, some
say, ineffective pharmaceutical-based medical model that has
dominated US health care for two centuries.43,
44,
45
A free people may refuse to buy and eat
GMO foods.46
A free people may walk away from doctors, who threaten and punish
patients for refusing to obey orders to get an annual flu shot or
decline to give their children every single government recommended
vaccine on schedule – no exceptions and no questions asked.47
The most rational and compelling arguments for defending health
freedom, including vaccine freedom of choice, are grounded in
ethics, law, science, and economics. The human right to voluntary,
informed consent to vaccination is the best example of why Americans
must not wait any longer to stand up and defend without compromise
the inalienable right to autonomy and protection of bodily
integrity.
NVIC: Defending Ethical Principle of Informed Consent
I and the more than 100,000 followers and supporters48
of the non-profit charity, the
National Vaccine Information Center, take an informed consent
position with regard to vaccination. Since our founding in 1982, we
have defended the ethical principle of informed consent to vaccine
risk-taking because vaccines are pharmaceutical products that carry
a risk of injury, death, and failure.49
Because informed consent to medical risk taking is the central
ethical principle guiding the ethical practice of medicine.50
We support the “first do no harm” precautionary approach to public
policymaking, which focuses on how much harm can be prevented
from a policy or law and not how much harm is acceptable.51
NVIC Supports Your Health Choices and Vaccine Exemptions
We do not advocate for or against use of vaccines. We support
your human and legal right to make informed, voluntary health care
decisions for yourself and your children and choose to use every
government recommended vaccine, a few vaccines or no vaccines at
all.52
NVIC has worked for more than 30 years to secure vaccine safety and
informed consent provisions in public health policies and laws,
including flexible medical, religious, and conscientious belief
vaccine exemptions.
We are doing this in an increasingly hostile environment created
by an industry-government-medical trade alliance that is lobbying
for laws to compel all Americans to use every government recommended
without deviation from the official schedule or face a growing
number of societal sanctions.53
Although historically, children have been the target for vaccine
mandates, authoritarian implementation of federal vaccine policy is
not just for children anymore, it is rapidly expanding to include
all adults.54,
55
Californians Stood Up for Personal Belief Vaccine Exemption
In 2012, many California residents traveled to Sacramento to
protest a law introduced by a pediatrician legislator to make it
harder for parents to file a personal belief vaccine exemption for
their children to attend school. They responded to Action Alerts we
issued through the online
NVIC Advocacy Portal and lined the halls of the state Capitol
building, many with their children, and waited for hours and hours
to testify at several public hearings.
Mother after mother and father after father, grandparents,
nurses, doctors, and students of chiropractic, came to the public
microphone. Some talked about how vaccine reactions left their
children sick and disabled but they can’t find a doctor to write a
medical exemption so their children can attend school; others talked
about how their babies died after vaccination; and others simply
opposed restriction of the legal right for parents to make medical
decisions for their minor children.
It was a remarkable public witnessing by articulate, courageous
citizens pleading with their elected representatives to do the right
thing.
The right thing would have been for lawmakers to vote to leave
the personal belief vaccine exemption alone so parents could
continue to make vaccine decisions for their minor children without
being forced to beg a hostile doctor or government official for
permission to do that. That didn’t happen.56
Today, parents in California are forced to pay a pediatrician or
other state-approved health worker to sign a personal belief vaccine
exemption and the doctor can refuse to sign and parents are
reporting many pediatricians ARE refusing to sign.
Californians Inspired Colorado Citizens to Stand Up in 2014
Yet, because in 2012 California citizens made a powerful public
statement by participating in the democratic process and taking
action with calls, letters, emails, and personal testimony, in 2014,
Colorado citizens were inspired to do the same when the personal
belief vaccine exemption was attacked in that state.
Because in 2012, enough people in California did not sit back and
assume the job of defending health freedom would get done by someone
else, in 2014, enough people in Colorado did not assume it would get
done by someone else.57
And this time, we were able to hold the line and
protect the personal belief vaccine exemption in that state from
being eliminated or restricted.58
This time, there were enough lawmakers in Colorado, who listened
and carefully considered the evidence.59
They did not cave in to pressure from drug industry, government, and
medical trade lobbyists60,
61,
62,
63 labeling a minority of citizens as “ignorant,”
“selfish,” “crazy,” and in need of having their parental and civil
rights taken away for defending the human right to self
determination and informed consent to vaccine risk-taking.
The Right to Make a Risk Decision Belongs to You
I do not tell anyone what risks to take and never will. The right
and responsibility for making a risk decision belongs to the person
taking the risk. When you become informed and think rationally about
a risk you or your child will take – and then follow your conscience
– you own that decision. And when you own a decision, you can defend
it. And once you can defend it, you will be ready to do whatever it
takes to fight for your freedom to make it, no matter who tries to
prevent you from doing that.
Einstein: ‘Never do anything against conscience’
Albert Einstein, who risked arrest in Germany in the 1930s when
he spoke out against censorship and persecution of minorities, said,
“Never do anything against conscience even if the State demands
it.”64
It takes strength to act independently. When the herd is all running
toward the cliff, the one running in the opposite direction seems
crazy. People who think rationally and act independently
even when the majority does not, may be the only ones to survive!
Gandhi: ‘Speak Your Mind’
Gandhi was often persecuted by the ruling majority for
challenging their authority and using non-violent civil disobedience
to publicly dissent. He said, “Never apologize for being
correct, for being ahead of your time. If you’re right and you know
it, speak your mind. Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is
still the truth.”65
Sharing what you know to be true empowers others to make conscious
choices.
Jefferson: ‘The Minority Possess Their Equal Rights’
The authors of the US Constitution made sure to include strong
language securing individual liberties, including freedom of
thought, speech, and conscience. They did that because many of the
families immigrating to America had personally faced discrimination
and persecution in other countries for holding beliefs different
from the ruling majority.
In his first Presidential inaugural address, Thomas Jefferson
warned: “All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that
though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that
will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority posses
their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate
would be oppression.”66
Getting Vaccinated Is Not a Patriotic Act
There is no liberty more fundamentally a natural, inalienable
right than the freedom to think independently and follow your
conscience when choosing what you will risk your life or your
child’s life for. And that is why voluntary, informed consent to
medical risk taking is a human right.
Despite what you are being told by paid propaganda experts67,
68 spinning the conversation about vaccination and health
in the media today, getting vaccinated is not a patriotic act69
and declining to use a government recommended vaccine is not a
criminal act.70
It is a choice.
All Born Equal But Not the Same
Vaccination must remain a choice because, while we are all born
equal, with equal rights under the law, we are not born all the
same. Each one of us is born with different genes and a unique
microbiome71
influenced by epigenetics72
that affects how we respond to the environments we live in. We do
not all respond the same way to infectious diseases73
and we do not all respond the same way to pharmaceutical products
like vaccines.74,
75,
76,
77 Public health laws that fail to respect biodiversity
and force everyone to be treated the same are unethical and
dangerous.
My Son’s Severe DPT Vaccine Reaction
The first time I really understood what it means to belong to a
minority was after I witnessed my son, Chris, suffer a convulsion,
collapse shock, and brain inflammation within hours of his fourth
DPT shot when he was two and a half years old. I remember that day
in 1980 when I took my exceptionally bright, healthy two and a half
year old son to the pediatrician with all the trust and faith of a
young first time mother.
Saying words at seven months, speaking in full sentences and
identifying words by age two, my precocious, cheerful little boy had
a friend, Timmy, who lived across the street and also got four DPT
shots by age two. Timmy was born to a different mother and father
with a different genetic, biological, and environmental history.
Timmy did not have a milk allergy or a family history of
autoimmunity and allergy like Chris. He had not experienced a severe
local reaction after his third DPT shot like Chris had and, unlike
Chris, Timmy had not just finished a course of antibiotics before he
was vaccinated a fourth time.
Timmy did not have a reaction to his booster DPT shot. Chris did.
Within hours of vaccination, I watched my son’s eyes roll back in
his head and his head fall to his shoulder as if he had fallen
asleep sitting up. It was a classic post-DPT vaccine convulsion and
collapse shock reaction78
and I didn’t know. Then, when he slept for hours without moving and
I thought he was just taking a really long nap, I didn’t understand
that he was unconscious79
and could have died in his bed and I would never have known why
because my pediatrician did not tell me about DPT vaccine risks or
how to identify vaccine reaction symptoms.80,
81,
82,
83
Vaccine Induced Brain Inflammation and Regression
The immune mediated brain inflammation, also known as
encephalopathy,84,
85,
86 that Chris experienced after DPT vaccination was
followed by progressive deterioration in physical, mental, and
emotional health, including chronic infections, constant diarrhea,
new allergies, failure to thrive, loss of previous cognitive skills,
inability to concentrate, and personality and behavior changes.
Chris could no longer do what he could do before his fourth DPT
shot. He became a totally different child.
After repeated testing, he was diagnosed with minimal brain
damage, including multiple learning disabilities and attention
deficit disorder and placed in a special education classroom for the
learning disabled where he stayed through his public education until
the end of high school. Chris and I know how very fortunate he was
that the severe vaccine reaction he experienced did not take his
life or leave him with far more serious brain and immune dysfunction
like so many of the children we have both come to know since then.
Today, Chris is a videographer and competitive power lifter. He
has worked hard to compensate for the learning disabilities that
made his childhood a frustrating, unhappy, and sometimes dangerous
time in his life. Recent testing has revealed that Chris has an
exceptional ability to engage in abstract thinking and that, when
his learning disabilities are discounted, he has a high IQ, which is
one reason why he was so frustrated and lost in a special education
system that does not have a place for children like him.
Vaccine Reaction Survivors: The Walking Wounded
Chris is a vaccine reaction survivor. He is among the walking
wounded, who are not left with severe vaccine injuries, but whose
futures are compromised in childhood when the risks of vaccination
turn out to be 100 percent. How many mothers do not witness a
child’s vaccine reaction and never understand why their children’s
physical, mental, and emotional health suddenly regressed after
vaccination? How many of those children are filling the special
education classrooms, doctor’s offices, mental health facilities,
and prisons in America?
The Risks of Trusting Without Verifying
What happened to my healthy son after vaccination in 1980 sent me
on a journey to learn more and find out why doctors are not talking
about vaccine risks and why a commercial product that can brain
damage and kill people is being mandated. In part, I was driven by
disappointment in myself as a college educated woman, who had come
from a family of doctors and nurses and had worked as a writer at a
teaching hospital before I became a Mom.
Why did I irrationally assume that vaccines were 100 percent safe
and effective? Why had I blindly trusted a doctor instead of
examining vaccination with the same due diligence that I had
researched nutrition and toxic exposures during pregnancy and had
taken prepared childbirth classes to weigh the merits of an epidural
versus natural childbirth and breast feeding versus bottle feeding?
A Journey to Find Out Why
Some of my questions were answered during the two years of
research that medical historian Harris Coulter and I conducted, when
I learned that pertussis vaccine contains lethal pertussis toxin87,
88,
89 and endotoxin,90,
91 as well as aluminum and mercury,92,
93 which can make the blood brain more permeable.94,
95,
96
That research culminated in the publishing of our 1985 book
DPT: A Shot in the Dark.97
Harris and I were the first to report an association between vaccine
induced brain inflammation and a spectrum of brain dysfunction that
doctors give labels like seizures, learning disabilities, ADHD, and
autism. But it would take another 25 years of research and
interfacing with politicians and serving on committees with doctors
in industry, government, and medical trade to answer the rest of my
questions.98
Everybody Knows Somebody
In 1982, when I joined with parents of DPT vaccine injured
children and co-founded the non-profit charity that is known today
as the National Vaccine Information Center, the number of Americans
questioning the safety of vaccines was so tiny, it could not even by
measured in public opinion polls.
Three decades later, national polls reveal that the majority of
parents in America say the Number One child health concern they have
is about the safety of vaccines.99
That is because in the 21st century, everybody knows somebody who
was healthy, got vaccinated, and was never healthy again.
Militarization of Vaccine Policy: Fear Replacing Trust
And people are talking about it, especially mothers taking their
children to pediatricians because we are the ones who carry our
babies inside us for nine months and give birth and feed and nurture
them through infancy and are responsible for their health and we are
the ones who usually quit work and stay home and care for them when
they are never well anymore.
Mothers are asking their doctors logical questions about
vaccination and when their doctors react to those questions with
irrational rage or cold refusal to provide medical care if one or
more vaccines are declined, it becomes obvious that there is
something very wrong with doctors using threats to push and enforce
use of a pharmaceutical product.100,
101,
102,
103 The militarization of vaccine policy in the United
States is eroding the trust that used to exist between the people
and their doctors and that broken trust is being replaced by fear.104,
105
From 23 Doses of 7 Vaccines to 69 Doses of 16 Vaccines
One of the reasons parents are asking more questions about
vaccination is that there have been big changes in US vaccine policy
and law since 1982. In 1982, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention officials told pediatricians to give children 23 doses of
seven vaccines before age six, with the first vaccinations starting
at two months old.106
Today, the CDC has upped that number to 69 doses of 16 vaccines by
age 18, with 49 doses of 14 vaccines given between the day of birth
and age six.107
That is twice the number of vaccines children in the 1980s got by
age six and three times as many vaccinations as Americans used to
get during their whole life! But these new vaccines are not for
diseases like smallpox and polio. They are for infant diarrhea and
chickenpox, which are rarely fatal in this country, and hepatitis B,
which requires direct exposure to infected blood and cannot be
easily transmitted in public.108
Jacobsen v. Massachusetts: State Police Powers Affirmed
These are not the kind of infectious diseases the justices of the
1905 US Supreme Court probably had in mind when they issued their
ruling in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts.109
In that precedent setting split decision, the high court majority
ruled that state legislatures could use police powers to force a
minority of dissenting citizens to use smallpox vaccine for what
medical doctors and government officials judge to be the greater
good of the majority. Those early 20th century justices based their
decision in part on a false premise argued by lawyers representing
public health officials, who argued that medical doctors could
predict ahead of time who will be injured or die from smallpox
vaccination.
Doctors have never been able to predict with any certainty who
will be injured and die from vaccination. In affirming the
constitutional right of states to use police powers to enact public
health laws, the Supreme Court was also reaffirming the roles of
state government versus the federal government in public health law.
Anything not defined in the US Constitution as a federal
responsibility has traditionally defaulted to the states. Public
health was not defined in the Constitution as a federal
responsibility so public health laws have always been state laws and
this is why vaccination laws vary from state to state.110,
111
A Utilitarian Rationale Turned Into Law
It is important to note that the Supreme Court ruling in
Jacobsen v. Massachusetts at the turn of the 20th century was
clearly based on a utilitarian rationale that a minority of citizens
opposing vaccination should be forced to get vaccinated in service
to the majority. Utilitarianism was a popular ethical theory in the
late 19th and early 20th century in Britain and the US and was used
by government officials as a mathematical guide to making public
policy that ensured “the greatest happiness for the greatest number
of people.”112,
113 Today, utilitarianism has a much more benign and
lofty name attached to it: “the greater good.”
Minorities at Risk When State Employs Militant Utilitarianism
Perhaps that is because utilitarianism went out of fashion in the
mid-20th century after, beginning in 1933, the Third Reich employed
the utilitarian rationale as an excuse to demonize minorities judged
to be a threat to the health and well being of the State.114
Enlisting the assistance of government health officials,115,
116,
117,
118 the first minority to be considered expendable for the
good of the State were severely handicapped children, the
chronically sick and mentally ill, the “useless eaters” they were
called.119,
120
And when the reasons for why a person was identified as a threat
to the health, economic stability, or security of the State grew
longer to include minorities who were too old or too Jewish or too
Catholic or too opinionated or simply unwilling to believe what
those in control of the State said was true… as the list of those
the State branded as persons of interest to be demonized, feared,
tracked, isolated, and eliminated grew, so did the collective denial
of those who had yet to be put on that list.121,
122
Jacobsen v Massachusetts Used to Embrace Eugenics in US
Prophetically, in 1927, US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall
Holmes invoked the Jacobsen v. Massachusetts “greater good”
utilitarian decision to justify using the heel of the boot of the
State to force the sterilization of a young Virginia woman, Carrie
Buck, who doctors and social workers incorrectly judged to be
mentally retarded like they said her mother was.123
In a chilling statement endorsing eugenics,124
Holmes revealed the morally corrupt core of utilitarianism that
still props up mandatory vaccination laws in the US.
Pointing to the Jacobsen vs. Massachusetts decision,
Holmes declared that the state of Virginia could force Carrie Buck
to be sterilized to protect society from mentally retarded people.
Coldly, Holmes proclaimed, “three generations of imbeciles are
enough” and “The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination
is broad enough to cover cutting the fallopian tubes.”125
The 1905 US Supreme Court majority made fundamental scientific and
ethical errors in their ruling in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts.
It is clear that medical doctors cannot predict ahead of
time who will be injured or die from vaccination and that is a
scientific fact.126,
127
Utilitarianism Is a Discredited Pseudo-Ethic
Utilitarianism is a discredited pseudo-ethic that has been used
to justify horrific human rights abuses not only in the Third Reich128,
129 but in human scientific experimentation130
and the inhumane treatment of prisoners and political dissidents
here and in many countries,131,
132,
133,
134 which is why it should never be used as a guide to
public policy and law by any government.
Although we may disagree about the quality and quantity of the
scientific evidence used by doctors and governments to declare
vaccines are safe at the population level, at our peril do we fail
to agree that, while the State may have the power, it does not have
the moral authority to dictate that a minority of individuals born
with certain genes and biological susceptibilities give up their
lives without their consent for what the ruling majority has judged
to be the greater good.
Our Lives Are Defined by the Choices We Make
The journey we take in this life is defined by the choices we
make. And if we are not free to make those choices, the journey is
not our own. And the choices we make that involve risk of harm to
our physical body, which houses our mind and spirit, those choices
are among the most profound choices we make in this life, which is
why we must be free to make them.
From November 8th - 14th we launch
Vaccine-Awareness Week.
We set aside an entire week dedicated to advocating vaccine safety
and informed consent in the public health system.
Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the website of the non-profit charity,
the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at
www.NVIC.org:
-
NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims: View
descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have
suffered vaccine reactions, injuries, and deaths. If you or your
child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider
posting and sharing your story here.
-
If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions: Learn
how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and prevent vaccine
injuries.
-
Vaccine Freedom Wall: View or post
descriptions of harassment and sanctions by doctors, employers,
and school and health officials for making independent vaccine
choices.
Together, Let's Help NVIC Get to the Finish Line
This is the week we can get NVIC the funding it deserves. I have
found few NGOs as effective and efficient, as NVIC. Its small team
has led the charge on vaccines and informed consent and will
continue to do so with our help!
So I am stepping up with the challenge. For the fourth year in a
row, I will match the funds you give. This year, I believe a
$100,000 match is the right thing to do. Please give, and all
dollars received up to $100,000 will be matched by Natural Health
Research Foundation, which I founded.
Also check out the documentary
Bought from now until November 21st, that
exposes the inner workings of the food and healthcare systems,
exploring the truth about the manufacture and sales of vaccines and
drugs. All proceeds from sales of the video (minus $1 for the
distributor) will be donated to the NVIC.
Copyright 1997- 2014 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/11/13/vaccination-health-freedom.aspx
|