A line of trucks carrying water to Natural gas rigs
make their way across the sprawling network of two lane
roads between small towns to make almost constant
deliveries to continue the hydraulic fracturing process
used to gather natural gas in Monroeton, Pennsylvania,
January 13, 2013.
(Reuters) - The biggest product of the U.S. petroleum
industry is not oil, gas or condensate but water --
billions and billions of gallons containing dissolved
salts, grease and even naturally occurring radioactive
materials.
In 2007, when the shale revolution was still in its
infant stages, the U.S. oil and gas industry was already
producing more than 20 billion barrels of waste water
per year, according to researchers at the Argonne
National Laboratory (“Produced water volumes and
management practices in the United States”, 2009).
The industry’s daily output was 5 million barrels of
oil, 67 billion
cubic feet of
natural gas, and 55 million barrels of water,
according to federal government statistics.
Argonne estimated that more than 7.5 barrels of water
were produced for every barrel of crude, and 260 barrels
of water for every million
cubic feet of
natural gas, based on state and federal
records for onshore oil and gas production.
If offshore production is included, the figures drop
slightly to 5.3 barrels for every barrel of crude and
182 barrels for every million cubic feet of natural gas.
But all these numbers are likely to understate the
water-to-oil and water-to-gas ratios, since some of the
most important states, including Texas, did not report
their production statistics in sufficient detail to
compute ratios accurately.
Older wells produce a higher proportion of water, so
states with a long history of oil and gas production and
large numbers of aging stripper wells tend to have the
highest volumes of water production and the highest
water-to-oil and water-to-gas ratios.
The five old oil- and gas-producing states of Texas
(7.4 billion barrels of water), California (2.6
billion), Oklahoma (2.2 billion), Kansas (1.2 billion)
and Louisiana (1.1 billion) accounted for almost three
quarters of water production in 2007.
California oil wells produced more than 10 barrels of
water for every barrel of oil, rising to 22 barrels in
Kansas and 43 barrels in Illinois. In contrast, North
Dakota reported just 134 million barrels of produced
water in 2007, an average of three barrels of water for
every one of oil.
Unfortunately, there are no more-recent comprehensive
nationwide estimates. But the amount of produced water
being handled is now much higher thanks to the shale
revolution.
In Pennsylvania, for example, gas production rose
from 0.20 trillion cubic feet in 2006 to 2.26 trillion
in 2012, and the amount of produced water quadrupled
from 6.6 million barrels to 24.4 million, according to
the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Across the United States, water production is now
probably between 60 million and 70 million barrels every
day, based on the rise in oil and gas output.
Yet the issue of produced water commands hardly any
attention compared with the enormous media interest
shown in the much smaller volumes of water employed in
fracking operations.
RE-USE AND DISPOSAL
Much of the water produced from offshore wells, which
accounted for around 590 million barrels in 2007, just 3
percent of the total, is treated and discharged at sea,
subject to strict controls enforced by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
From onshore oil and gas wells, small quantities of
waste water are cleaned up and put to beneficial uses
irrigating crops, watering
livestock, de-icing roads, and in
aquaculture, power plants, dust suppression and fire
prevention.
But the vast majority of water from onshore oil and
gas wells, accounting for more than 92 percent of all
produced water, is re-injected underground to maintain
pressure in the reservoir (71 percent) or into
non-producing formations for disposal (21 percent).
Produced water is the technical term used by
engineers and regulators to describe all the water
brought to the surface from a hydrocarbon well.
Some is flowback water, which was originally injected
during the fracking phase and then returns to the
surface in the first few days and weeks of the well’s
production.
But most is formation water, which is naturally
present along with oil and gas in petroleum-bearing rock
formations and comes to the surface with the oil and
gas.
Because the flowback and formation water has been in
contact with the hydrocarbon-bearing formations, it
picks up some of the chemical characteristics of the
formations and the hydrocarbons, as Argonne explains.
SAFETY ISSUES
Flowback water contains traces of the chemicals
injected into the well along with the water and proppant
during fracking operations.
The chemical additives include anti-microbials,
anti-coagulants, corrosion and scale inhibitors,
emulsion breakers and solvents.
The chemicals have become a prominent target for
anti-fracking campaigners, who fear they could
contaminate underground drinking water supplies or
surface water when they return to the surface.
In practice, these additives comprise less than 0.5
percent of the volume of liquid injected into a typical
well.
Most are chemically identical to those found in
common household cleaning products, cosmetics,
antifreeze and food, according to North Dakota’s
Department of Mineral Resources, which regulates the
state’s oil and gas industry (“North Dakota Rural
Water”, July 2012).
By contrast, the much larger quantity of produced
formation water has received much less attention,
probably because the industry has been managing it
without major controversy for decades.
Formation water contains large amounts of dissolved
grease and other organic compounds, as well as salts and
radioactive substances found in the Earth’s crust.
Most produced waters are more saline than seawater,
which limits their use in agriculture or power plants,
where corrosion is an important consideration.
Some of the trace elements are commercially useful.
Iodide recovered from produced water in Oklahoma is the
largest source of iodine in the United States, according
to USGS.
Other elements are more potentially problematic,
however. In some parts of the United States, including
Pennsylvania, produced water contains high
concentrations of radionuclides such as radium and
strontium formed by the decay of uranium and thorium
naturally occurring underground.
That hasn’t stopped states in the Northeast and
Midwest, including New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio and
Michigan, from spreading produced water on the roads to
suppress dust in summer and de-ice them in winter,
according to the U.S. Geological Survey (“USGS
investigations of water produced during hydrocarbon
reservoir development”, November 2014).
RISK EVALUATION
By and large, the petroleum industry has dealt with
the problem of produced water safely. High-risk
practices that were once common, such as giant surface
evaporation ponds, have mostly been banned.
There is a huge disparity between the media attention
given to the environmental and safety issues linked to
water used in fracking, the volumes injected
underground, and the chemical additives used, and the
much larger volumes of formation water handled by the
industry every day.
On average, it takes 2 million to 4 million gallons
of water to fracture a new oil well in North Dakota,
according to the state regulator, which is between
50,000 and 100,000 barrels. But the United States was
handling 55 million barrels of produced water every day
in 2007, the latest available data for the country as a
whole.
In a classic case of not putting the risks from
industrial processes into proper perspective,
campaigners have focused on the threat of contamination
and earthquakes from the relatively small amounts of
water being employed in pressure pumping operations
while ignoring the much larger volume of produced water
being handled, mostly safely, by the rest of the
industry.
(Editing by
Dale Hudson)