Chinese Government Sued for
Genetically Modified Food
April 21, 2015
By Dr. Mercola
Chinese citizens have filed a lawsuit against China's Ministry of
Agriculture, demanding that the agency make public an animal study
used to approve Monsanto's Roundup herbicide nearly three decades
ago.
Monsanto provided the animal test to the Ministry in 1985, but to
date the Chinese government has refused to release the report,
citing Monsanto's right to protect their commercial secrets.
The lawsuit is demanding increased transparency over Roundup,
with Chinese citizens eager to review the supposed "safety" study
used for its approval. The case has been accepted but a date for a
hearing has not yet been set.1
While genetically modified (GM) food crops are banned for
cultivation in China, the government is reportedly "trying to foster
positive public opinion of GMO food crops."2
The country also imports 65 percent of the world's soybeans, many of
which are GM and doused with Monsanto's Roundup. China is also the
biggest producer of Roundup worldwide.3
Roundup's Active Ingredient Ruled a 'Probable Carcinogen'
The lawsuit comes on the heels of an announcement by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) that Roundup's
active ingredient, glyphosate, as a "probable carcinogen" (Class
2A).4
According to Dr. Aaron Blair, a cancer epidemiologist and scientist
emeritus at the National Institutes of Health (NIH):5
"There were enough studies to suggest something was going
on, but not enough to be sure that was absolutely happening."
IARC is the research arm of the World Health Organization (WHO)
and is considered the global gold standard for carcinogenicity
studies, so this determination is of considerable importance. IARC
is also one of the five research agencies from which the OEHHA—which
is the California agency of environmental hazards—gets its reports
to declare carcinogens under Prop. 65.
So, eventually, foods containing detectable levels of glyphosate
will likely have to have a Prop. 65 warning label to be sold in
California. While glyphosate is commonly used on conventional crops,
GM crops tend to be more heavily contaminated.
GM Roundup Ready crops are designed to tolerate greater amounts
of the chemical, and farmers growing GM plants tend to have more
trouble with
resistant weeds, requiring ever-heavier herbicide applications.
Monsanto Doctor Says Glyphosate Is Safe
Monsanto, not surprisingly, has called for the IARC to retract
its report, saying it's based on cherry-picked data, a statement GM
Watch called hokum:6
"This is pure hokum, as is evident from a glance at the
system for regulatory approval of every GMO and pesticide in the
world. Approvals are based solely on a set of safety data
provided by the GMO or chemical company that manufactures the
product and stands to profit from its approval. Independent
studies — which are far more likely than industry studies to
find risk — do not get a look in.
Epidemiological studies and other studies by independent
scientists, which generally do not conform to the outdated
protocols designed decades ago for industry toxicology studies,
are excluded from the risk assessment as irrelevant and
unreliable.
Industry's own safety data on its pesticides are a
commercial secret. Independent scientists and the public are not
allowed to see them… IARC based its verdict on published studies
and publicly available government reports.
This is how real science is done – when findings are
published, other scientists are free to build on the work and
refute or confirm it."
Meanwhile, Daniel Goldstein, Monsanto's associate medical
director, wrote a letter to the editor of The New York Times
stating that
glyphosate is safe and "probably the most thoroughly studied
pesticide in history."7
In other words, trust us… it's safe. Monsanto has steadfastly
claimed that Roundup is harmless to animals and humans because the
mechanism of action it uses (which allows it to kill weeds), called
the shikimate pathway, is absent in all animals.
However, the shikimate pathway is present in bacteria,
and that's the key to understanding how it causes such widespread
systemic harm in both humans and animals.
Glyphosate causes extreme disruption of the microbe's function
and lifecycle. What's worse, glyphosate preferentially
affects beneficial bacteria, allowing pathogens to overgrow
and take over.
In the interview above, Dr. Seneff reviews a variety of chronic
diseases, explaining how glyphosate contributes to each condition.
So to learn more, I urge you to listen to it in its entirety. It's
quite eye opening. This includes (but is not limited to) the
following:
Autism
Gastrointestinal diseases such as inflammatory bowel
disease, chronic diarrhea, colitis, and Crohn's disease
Obesity
Allergies
Cardiovascular disease
Depression
Cancer
Infertility
Alzheimer's disease
Parkinson's disease
Multiple sclerosis
ALS and more
US Regulators May Start Testing Food for Glyphosate Residues
It appears that concerns over glyphosate’s toxicity is finally
starting to be taken seriously. The US EPA recently announced it may
start testing for glyphosate residues on food. While thousands
of foods are tested for about 400 different pesticides each year,
glyphosate is not on that list simply because it’s been thought to
be safe. According to the EPA:8
"Given increased public interest in glyphosate, EPA may
recommend sampling for glyphosate in the future.”
While that’s good news, it’s worth noting that the EPA raised the
allowable limits for glyphosate in food in 2013, and the
allowable levels may be too high to protect human health, based on
mounting research. Root and tuber vegetables (with the exception of
sugar) got one of the largest boosts, with allowable residue limits
being raised from 0.2 ppm to 6.0 ppm.
Meanwhile, malformations in frog and chicken embryos have been
documented at 2.03 ppm of glyphosate.9
And, as reported by the Institute for Science in Society:10“The amount of allowable glyphosate in oilseed crops (except for
canola and soy) went up from 20 ppm to 40 ppm, 100 000 times
the amount needed to induce breast cancer cells.” [Emphasis
mine]
New Study: GM Crops Don't Reduce Pesticide Use
The majority of soybean, corn, canola, and sunflower seeds
planted in the US are coated with another type of chemical called
neonicotinoid pesticides (neonics).
The chemicals, which are produced by Bayer and Syngenta, travel
systemically through the plants and kill insects that munch on their
roots and leaves. Neonicotinoids are powerful neurotoxins and are
quite effective at killing the pests… but they're also being blamed
for decimating populations on non-target pests, namely pollinators
such as bees and butterflies.
Neonicotinoids have become the fastest growing insecticides in
the world. In the US, virtually all
genetically modified Bt corn crops are treated with
neonicotinoids. Pesticide makers have claimed that GM crops actually
cut down on pesticide use, including the use of neonicotinoids, but
a new study found this is not the case.
Researchers from Pennsylvania State University revealed that the
use of neonicotinoids increased rapidly from 2003 to 2011 "as
seed-applied products were introduced in field crops, marking an
unprecedented shift toward large-scale, preemptive insecticide use."11
According to study author Margaret Douglas:12
"Previous studies suggested that the percentage of corn
acres treated with insecticides decreased during the 2000s, but
once we took seed treatments into account we found the opposite
pattern.
Our results show that application of neonicotinoids to
seed of corn and soybeans has driven a major surge in the U.S.
cropland treated with insecticides since the mid-2000s."
Neonicotinoids Treat All Seeds, Even if Pests Aren't a Problem
US pest management policy is supposed to include Integrated Pest
Management (IPM), in which insecticides are used only in situations
where pest damage threatens crops. Yet neonicotinoids are applied
"pre-emptively," whether pests are a significant problem or not. As
reported by GM Watch:
"[Study authors] Douglas and Tooker pointed out that many
pest attacks are sporadic and not troublesome, which may explain
why studies have not found consistent yield benefits from the
use of neonicotinoids. They concluded that neonicotinoid seed
treatments are being used on many hectares where they do not
deliver an economic return and cannot be considered part of an
IPM approach.
Douglas and Tooker warned, 'This pattern of use may have
unintended consequences, namely resistance in target pests,
outbreaks of nontarget pests, and pollution with detrimental
effects cascading to wildlife… some of these effects have
already emerged.'"
Neonicotinoids have been detected in milkweeds, for instance,
which are critical to the survival of Monarch butterflies because
they're the only food source for Monarch larvae.13
Milkweed is also very susceptible to being killed by glyphosate,
and experts estimate the North American Monarch population has
plummeted by 91 percent over the last two decades.
Monarch's Recovery Pledge Nothing More Than Greenwashing
In March 2015, Monsanto announced it would spend $4 million to
help the monarch butterfly, including helping to support restoration
of the insect's habitat and increase milkweed seed production. This
is outrageous not only for the paltry sum they've donated but also
because one of the best ways to save the monarchs is to reduce the
use of Monsanto's Roundup and Roundup Ready crops. The Center for
Food Safety criticized Monsanto's announcement, with executive
director Andrew Kimbrell noting:14
"Monsanto brought in $15.85 billion in sales last year.
This pledge for monarchs equates to only 2 hours' worth of their
sales – hardly a substantial commitment. Regardless of amount,
the only way to save monarchs is a major reduction in Monsanto's
Roundup Ready crop systems, which are the leading cause of
Monarchs' threatened extinction… Throwing a pittance of money at
the problem is not a real path to survival; this maneuver is an
attempt to greenwash Monsanto's image, nothing more."
Milkweeds that used to abundantly line the Monarch's flight path
have been largely eradicated by modern agriculture.15
Not only are chemicals killing the milkweeds, but prairies are being
replaced by cornfields, and roadsides are being mowed where
milkweeds previously grew wild.
Bill Freese of the Center for Food Safety advocates restricting
the spraying of glyphosate late in the growing season, when milkweed
is flowering and more likely to be killed.16
Freese also supports measures to restore some milkweed plants to
farmland, noting that farmers and weed scientists have not found
milkweed to be much of a problem.
Of course, representatives of
Dow Chemical and Monsanto disagree. Monsanto spokesperson Charla
Lord is quoted as saying, "To a farmer, milkweed is a weed that
competes with crops in the field for water, soil, and nutrients."17
As Monsanto is pledging their support to save monarchs, they are
actively engaged in their demise. According to a press release from
eNews Park Forest:18
"The dramatic surge in Roundup use with Roundup Ready
crops has virtually wiped out milkweed plants in Midwestern corn
and soybean fields. In the past 20 years it is estimated that
these once-common iconic orange and black butterflies may have
lost more than 165 million acres of habitat — an area about the
size of Texas — including nearly a third of their summer
breeding grounds.
At the same time as Monsanto greenwashes its role in
monarch declines, the company plans to introduce additional GE
crops that will further threaten monarchs. On deck for Monsanto
are their GE dicamba-resistant soybean and cotton varieties,
which will be sprayed with both dicamba and glyphosate. These
'next-generation' GE crops will further degrade monarch breeding
habitat and kill off other nearby flowing plants used by adult
monarchs as nectar sources."
Argentine Farmers Accuse Monsanto of Imposing 'Private Duties'
Argentina's four farm lobbies claim that Monsanto is "abusing its
dominant market position" to impose "private duties" via exporters
to make producers pay for alleged transgenic seeds property rights."19
The farmers allege that Monsanto has signed confidential accords to
charge farmers an extra fee per ton of soybeans grown with
Monsanto's GM seeds. The farm lobbies said in a statement:20
"We, the producers, acknowledge that seeds' genetic
technology and improvements must get a fair retribution but
Monsanto's attempt to charge for royalties is unacceptable and
could set a precedent for other technology companies to adopt
similar methods to get paid, using third parties not involved in
the production process."
More than 18 million hectares in Argentina are covered by
genetically engineered soy, on which more than 300 million liters of
pesticides are sprayed. Studies strongly suggest that the glyphosate
these crops are doused with can cause cancer and birth deformities;
both of which are occurring at increasing rates in areas where
spraying is done. Sterility and miscarriages are also increasing in
the area. Experts warn that in 10 to 15 years, rates of cancer,
infertility, and endocrine dysfunction could reach
catastrophic levels in Argentina.
Do You Want to Avoid Pesticides in Your Food?
Your best bet for minimizing health risks from pesticide
exposure (even those the government claim are "safe") is to avoid
them in the first place by eating organic as much as possible and
investing in a good water
filtration system for your home or apartment. If you know you
have been exposed to pesticides, the lactic acid bacteria formed
during the fermentation of kimchi may also help your body break down
pesticides. So including
fermented
foods like kimchi in your diet may also be a wise strategy to
help detox the pesticides that do enter your body.
One of the benefits of eating organic is that the foods will be
free of GM ingredients – and this is key to avoiding exposure to
toxic glyphosate. The following are some great resources to obtain
wholesome organic food. Eating locally produced organic food will
not only support your family's health, it will also protect the
environment from harmful chemical pollutants and the inadvertent
spread of genetically engineered seeds and chemical-resistant weeds
and pests.
Meanwhile, if you'd like to voice your opinion about Monsanto's
herbicides, or get involved with saving Monarchs and other
pollinators, there are specific action steps you take below.
Local Harvest
-- This Web site will help you find farmers' markets, family
farms, and other sources of sustainably grown food in your area
where you can buy produce, grass-fed meats, and many other
goodies.
Eat Well
Guide: Wholesome Food from Healthy Animals -- The
Eat Well Guide is a free online directory of sustainably raised
meat, poultry, dairy, and eggs from farms, stores, restaurants,
inns, and hotels, and online outlets in the United States and
Canada.
FoodRoutes
-- The FoodRoutes "Find Good Food" map can help you connect with
local farmers to find the freshest, tastiest food possible. On
their interactive map, you can find a listing for local farmers,
CSAs, and markets near you.
Action Step #1: Petition for Classifying the Monarch as 'Threatened'
A 2014 White House memorandum calling for a federal strategy to
promote the health of honeybees and other pollinators, by way of a
multiagency Pollinator Health Task Force, has been introduced.21
The petition also urges the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
USDA, and President Obama to protect the Monarchs' breeding habitat
by halting the approval of Monsanto Roundup Ready™ and other
glyphosate-resistant and pesticide-promoting GE crops. As noted by
the Los Angeles Times:22
"Since federal glyphosate rules were last updated a
decade ago, its use has spiked tenfold to 182 million pounds a
year, largely due to the introduction and popularity of corn and
soybeans genetically modified to resist the herbicide... 'The
tenfold increase in the amount of glyphosate being used
corresponds with huge losses of milkweed and the staggering
decline of the Monarch,' said Sylvia Fallon, an NRDC senior
scientist. 'We are seeking new safeguards desperately needed to
allow enough milkweed to grow... The good news is that
butterflies are resilient and can rebound quickly... All they
need is milkweed on which to lay their eggs.'"
Action Step #2: Ask Retailers to Stop Selling Pesticide-Treated
Plants
If you live in the US, I would also encourage you to contact your
local garden centers, either by phone or in person, and ask them to
stop selling
bee-killing pesticides and neonicotinoid-treated plants.
Neonicotinoid pesticides are a newer class of chemicals that are
applied to seeds and taken up through the plant's vascular system as
it grows, where it's expressed in the pollen and nectar that
pollinators consume.
Due to pressure from consumers and environmental groups, retail
giant Lowe's recently announced they would eliminate neonicotinoid
pesticides from its stores by the spring of 2019, which is a major
victory.23
Action Step #3: You Can Support Bee and Butterfly Populations from
Home
To avoid harming bees and other helpful pollinators that visit
your garden, swap out toxic pesticide and lawn chemicals for organic
weed and pest control alternatives. Even some organic formulations
can be harmful to beneficial insects, so be sure to vet your
products carefully.
Better yet, get rid of your lawn altogether and plant an edible
organic garden. Both flower and vegetable gardens provide good
honeybee habitats. It's also recommended to keep a small basin of
fresh water in your garden or backyard, as bees actually do get
thirsty.
In order to support the Monarch butterflies, consider planting a
locally appropriate species of milkweed in your garden, on your
farm, or wherever you manage habitat.
You can use the
Milkweed Seed Finder to locate seeds in your area. Whatever you
choose to grow, please avoid purchasing
pesticide-treated plants.
Cut flower growers are among the heaviest users of toxic
agricultural chemicals, including pesticides, so if you must buy cut
flowers, make sure you select only organically grown and/or
fair-trade bouquets.
Ideally, you'll want to grow your own pollinator-friendly plants
from organic, untreated seed, but if you opt to purchase starter
plants, make sure to ask whether or not they've been pre-treated
with pesticides. Plant a pollinator-friendly garden by choosing a
variety of plants that will continue flowering from spring through
fall; check out the
Bee Smart Pollinator App for a database of nearly 1,000
pollinator-friendly plants.
Be sure to choose plants native to your region and stick with
old-fashioned varieties, which have the best blooms, fragrance and
nectar/pollen for attracting and feeding pollinators.
Keep in mind that you also help protect the welfare of all
pollinators every time you
shop organic and grass-fed, as you are actually "voting" for
less pesticides and herbicides with every organic and pastured food
and consumer product you buy. You can take bee preservation a step
further by trying your hand at amateur beekeeping. Maintaining a
hive in your garden requires only about an hour of your time each
week, benefits your local ecosystem—and you get to enjoy your own
homegrown honey!
What Are GMOs?
From April 19th through April 25th we launch GMO Awareness Week.
We set aside an entire week dedicated to providing you with
information on GMOs and labeling initiatives.
GMOs are a product of genetic engineering, meaning their genetic
makeup has been altered to induce a variety of “unique” traits to
crops, such as making them drought-resistant or giving them “more
nutrients.” GMO proponents claim that genetic engineering is “safe
and beneficial,” and that it advances the agricultural industry.
They also say that GMOs help ensure the global food supply and
sustainability. But is there any truth to these claims? I believe
not. For years, I've stated the belief that GMOs pose one of the
greatest threats to life on the planet. Genetic engineering is NOT
the safe and beneficial technology that it is touted to be.
Help Support GMO Labeling
The Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)—Monsanto’s Evil
Twin—is pulling out all the stops to keep you in the dark about
what’s in your food. For nearly two decades, Monsanto and corporate
agribusiness have exercised near-dictatorial control over American
agriculture. For example, Monsanto has made many claims that
glyphosate in Roundup is harmless to animals and humans. However,
recently the World Health Organization (WHO) had their research team
test glyphosate and have labeled it a probable carcinogen.
Public opinion around the biotech industry's contamination of our
food supply and destruction of our environment has reached the
tipping point. We're fighting back. That's why I was the first to
push for GMO labeling. I donated a significant sum to the first
ballot initiative in California in 2012, which inspired others to
donate to the campaign as well. We technically "lost the vote, but
we are winning the war, as these labeling initiatives have raised a
considerable amount of public awareness.
The insanity has gone far enough, which is why I encourage you to
boycott every single product owned by members of the GMA, including
natural and organic brands. More than 80 percent of our support
comes from individual consumers like you, who understand that real
change comes from the grassroots.
Thankfully, we have organizations like the Organic Consumers
Association (OCA) to fight back against these junk food
manufacturers, pesticide producers, and corporate giants.
Together, Let's Help OCA Get The Funding They Deserve
Let’s Help OCA get the funding it deserves. I have found very few
organizations who are as effective and efficient as OCA. It’s a
public interest organization dedicated to promoting health justice
and sustainability. A central focus of the OCA is building a
healthy, equitable, and sustainable system of food production and
consumption. That's why I'm proud to announce I will be matching
donations up to $250,000 this week.
Please make a donation to help OCA fight for GMO labeling.
Copyright 1997- 2015 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.