Beware – Our Water is Poisoned!
30th July 2015
By
Dr. Susan M. Walker
Guest Writer for
Wake Up World
Where we stand now in 2015, everyone is
drinking or absorbing poisoned water. Not just the usual poisons so many
health advocates have spoken of – such as fluoride, chlorine and certain
heavy metals that contaminate our drinking water – no, I’m referring
here to a poison far more insidious and far reaching in its
implications, and unless the water you drink is home filtered by reverse
osmosis, or distilled by steam, your water is likely poisoned (along
with your food supply) with radioactive waste sources outside of what is
considered “naturally occurring” radiation, such as radon (a TENORM).
What is alarming, is the
accumulative amount of man-made radioactive waste such as tritium (a
by-product of nuclear reactors, identified in municipal water reports as
‘tritiated water’ or HTO) (Biello, 2014, Scientific America). Tritium is
linked to cancer, it’s radioactivity is partly water based and can in
theory go anywhere in the body. What is even more alarming is that
radioactive tritium is only a part of the radioactive poisons in the
drinking water, but it is showing up in higher quantities, along
with other radioactive isotopes.
Tritium levels are 160 times higher than
the levels considered ‘safe’ by the EPA set back in 1977, and has been
accumulating in municipal water sources, wells, lakes, bays, oceans, and
other water-ways, especially those located near nuclear reactor sites –
those that are damaged, or had black outs and leaked radioactive
contaminants into the air, water, and land, making its way into various
waterways. This poisonous water is consumed by all of us — think about
baby formula, soft drinks, fruit juices, coffee, tea, etc, — everything
that uptakes water, including plant life, birds, fish, insects — all are
negatively affected.
Why Do I Feel It Urgent We Begin
to Discuss Our Poisoned Water?
The land and water are not in harmony
anymore! In fact the earth is terribly sick from poisons, including
man-made radioactive waste, as well as other man-made toxic
waste. Our water in particular, has become increasingly more
contaminated throughout history, and this contamination has become
increasingly more worrisome since 1942; when Europe and the U.S.
military began disposing their nuclear waste from weapons into oceans,
and the fall-out from atomic bomb testing. (Alvarez, 2012)
Numerous resources collated
in Wikipedia.com report that the following countries dumping radioactive
waste into the oceans: the USSR, the UK, Switzerland, the US, Belgium,
France, the Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, Russia, New Zealand, Germany,
Italy and South Korea. All together, they dumped as much as 85,100 TBq
(85.1x1015Bq) of radioactive waste in more than 100 ocean sites
(measured at the time of its initial dumping of radioactivity).
Discussions to cease radioactive waste
dumping in the water began in 1972. International treaties were
established, and by 1993, a treaty was signed banning ocean disposal of
low-level radioactive wastes and promises to end dumping and
incineration of industrial wastes (1972; London Convention, Basel
Convention, MARPOL 73/78).
However, reports are surfacing today
disclosing that nuclear waste is still being disposed of into
oceans, especially off the coast of Somalia due to its defunct
government or those illegally dumping.
Up until this past century, the oceans
were able to handle the radioactive waste by dilution without showing
too much stress. Radioactive dilution in some ocean currents though, is
carrying the radioactive particles from coast to coast as sited from the
nuclear spills coming from Japan, and traveling the currents that reach
Alaska and California.
Was Fukushima Worse Than We Were Told?
Mixed reports want the public to believe
that there is very little risk from radioactive fallout or spills, but
as I continued to research, I saw photos of devastated sea life –
especially walruses and seals – who fed on herring and other food
chain fish, or plankton that travel through radioactive waste.
I also came across a report on one
Alaskan fishery noting that one of its fish samples contained
radioactive signatures from
Japan’s damaged reactors. The FDA does not require nor does it pay
Alaskan fisheries to test their fish — however, due to public clamor for
guarantees over the safety of consuming salmon, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) acquired samples for testing, and posted their
results (2014). However, the data was compiled and its conclusions were
reported on in a strange spreadsheet program that was difficult to open,
let alone discern meaning meaning from, since there was no legend
attached. I looked for information on the Alaskan fishery that reported
radioactivity, but the FDA did not include this company’s name or
details in its findings, and in conclusion to what I could gather from
their numbers, there was no radiation found in their samples — not even
trace amounts. This leads me to believe the trace numbers were changed
in order for their samples to appear untainted.

Are Consumers Being Duped?
It would appear so, as Japanese
researchers (2014) who are conducting independent testing of their fish
contradict the FDA’s U.S. findings. Their results showed 65 per cent of
the catches tested positive for cesium. In order to diminish public
panic of those who would unknowingly purchase radioactive fish, the food
safety agencies in Japan, the United States, and Canada simply doubled
the “acceptable level of radiation” duping the public by making it
appear as though the poisonous water, vegetation, and sea life are safe
to consume (Watson, 2013).
Other contradictory reports indicating
cause for alarm are surfacing, indicating unusual phenomena that is
being attributed to radioactivity; such as red tides, large numbers of
beached whales, diseased sea creatures such as sea lions and walruses
showing bloody lesions, mullet, tuna, star fish disintegration, and
salmon, crustaceans and other sea live containing concentrations of
tritium, strontium 90, cesium 30, iodine 131. It is the same for sea
plants such as seaweed and algae.
Radioactive waste in our global waters, is problematic to the
health and wellbeing of everyone and everything.
In the U.S. alone, there are 31 aging
nuclear reactors similar in design to Japan’s nuclear reactors that were
severely damaged when a sizeable earthquake created the 150 foot wall of
water that traveled inland about 6 miles, causing their nuclear reactors
in Fukushima to go off line or black out, then melt-down. These damaged
reactors not only leak
radioactive water containing radioactive iodine 131, uranium,
plutonium, strontium 90, cesium 137, and tritium into the ocean to this
day, but they also released up to a 210 quadrillion becquerel fission
cloud filled with cesium 137 into the atmosphere, according to
Christoudias, T. and Lelieveld, J., (2013; “Modeling the global
atmospheric transport and deposition of radionuclides from the Fukushima
Dai-ichi nuclear accident,” (Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1425-1438,
doi:10.5194/acp-13-1425-2013).
Media Complicity in a Cover-up?
The media is quick to cover severe
nuclear reactor atrocities like those of Japan, Chernobyl, and Three
Mile Island, but what of the lesser know ‘mishaps’ in the U.S. such as
Browns Ferry (AL) or Crystal Lake (FL), that experienced black outs or
damage, and leaked radioactive water into the surrounding area, along
with radioactive plumes into the air?
Wikipedia reports that there have been
over 56 U.S. nuclear reactor accidents alone. The resulting damage to
human health alone is not widely discussed, nor is accumulation of
radioactive waste in the drinking water highly publicized. In fact many
reports down play the extreme hazard of repeated consumption of
uranium-235, strontium 90, plutonium, uranium, tritium, and thorium-232
as merely nothing to worry about! But cancer rates, especially thyroid
cancer, bone, lung, and pancreatic cancers, are rising exponentially for
populations close to nuclear reactors – those exposed repeatedly to
radioactive pollution.
What About Fracking Waste, and On-going Contamination from
Previous Nuclear Incidents?
Fracking companies too are disposing of
radioactive waste in the holes they are drilling in search of natural
gas, consequently ground water is being
further poisoned around these fracking sites.
Dr.’s John W. Gofman, (“Poisoned Power”
1971) and Ian Fairlie (“The Guardian”, Jan. 20, 2010), stated in their
research that, “There is no safe dose of radiation.” In a meta
analysis examination of ionizing radiation on mutation from the
Chernobyl accident, researchers, Anders Pape Møllera and Timothy A.
Mousseau found a significant correlation of the ionizing radiation and
causation of mutation (Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 8363. Published online 2015 Feb
10. doi: 10.1038/srep08363.
Reports on testing wild boar some 25
years after Chernobyl, still show significant levels of
radiation and therefore, these animals are deemed uneatable.
Things are Going from Bad to Worse
Radiation in our drinking water is now
accumulating at an alarming rate. People and wildlife are at risk of
developing cancer and serious disease as a result of this contamination,
especially those who live within 100 miles of an aging nuclear facility,
or near a nuclear facility experiencing a black out or off line
scenario. Those who live near a fracking sites are also at risk.
We need to think about the impact of
radioactivity upon human life – my life, your life, your parent’s life,
your families’ life. Would you knowingly feed your baby poisoned water –
the water you add to powdered formulas? What about vegetation absorbing
poisoned water? Food crops, orchards? We need to think about the
animals, birds, and insects, that eat poisoned vegetation and drink
poisoned water. Do we have the right to destroy nature in this way? What
about the sea life, especially the
sea creatures we eat such as oysters, shrimp, sardines, lobster,
crab, tuna, salmon, etc. They are now all contaminated with poisonous
radioactive water. Are you prepared to just go along with this
situation, or will you answer the urgent call to take action?
Given that we have been told we have now
entered the 6th extinction level event on this planet, perhaps like me,
you may feel the time is NOW to start making a lot of noise about this!
Perhaps its time to start writing to your local representatives and
voicing your concerns, or start online petitions to gather signature we
can deliver to those who say they represent us?
I say the time is nigh!
Article sources:
-
www.foe.org/system/storage/877/7a/f/2595/Alvarez_military_nuclear_Wastes_12-01-2012_rev._1.pdf
- UNSCEAR “Exposures of the public and workers from various
sources of radiation”
- UNSCEAR “Health effects due to radiation from the Chernobyl
accident”
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry “Estimate
of aerial release of radioactive nucleotides” retrieved
2012-02-20 – Idaho State University “Radiation Information Network’s
Radioactivity in Nature”
- Christoudias, T. and Lelieveld, J., (2013; “Modeling the global
atmospheric transport and deposition of radionuclides from the
Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident,” (Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1425-1438, doi:10.5194/acp-13-1425-2013)
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_disposal_of_radioactive_waste
-
“Radioactive Emissions and Health Hazards Surrounding Browns Ferry
Nuclear Plant in Alabama” (PDF) brings up a litany of concerns.
-
http://ieer.org/resource/factsheets/uranium-its-uses-and-hazards/
- IAEA-TECDOC-1105. page 3-4 – 1946
- First dumping operation at Northeast Pacific Ocean Data are from
IAEA-TECDOC-1105. Summary of pages 27–120
-
http://www.livescience.com/39067-fukushima-radiation-5-things-to-know.html
-
http://naturalsociety.com/obama-increases-allowable-levels-radiation-drinking-water-dramatically/
- Dec 18, 2014 – The Nuclear Industry calls this their “new
normal,” according to Public … 12 about dumping radioactive waste
into the ocean. … Reminder: Fukushima Radiation Levels 95% Higher
than Reported, … Duh, let then eat yellow cake! way better … Please
reconsider as Lead in our drinking water is unacceptable –
Scientific American.
- Feb 7, 2014 – Tritium leaked into water from the Braidwood
nuclear power plant. … for tritium that has found its way into
water—so-called tritiated water, or HTO—along with risk … That is
160 times higher than the standard set back in 1977 by the fledgling
…. Ionization is what makes radiation dangerous for human health.
Scientific American
- NOAA-EPA-FDA Statement “U.S. Seafood Safe and Unaffected by
Radiation Contamination from Japanese Nuclear Power Plant Incident;
U.S. Monitoring Control Strategy Explained”
http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagov-foods-
gen/documents/document/ucm253896.pdf
-
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/36-signs-media-lying-fukushima-radiation-affecting-west-coast/
- Fukushima Radiation Concerns in Alaska
dec.alaska.gov › DEC › EH › Food Safety & Sanitation › Seafood
- FDA Sampling Results of AK Fish All Non-Detect (ND) for
Fukushima Related Radiation … presence of small amounts of
radioactivity from the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear … The sample,
which was collected on February 19 in Ucluelet, British … The
results of testing conducted on Alaskan fish in 2014 results showed
no…
About the author:
Dr.
Susan M. Walker, Educator, researcher, analyst, instructor, and
single-mother. I have spent many years standing up for what is right
despite, differing opinion. The purity of water, healthy foods,
vitamins, minerals, disease, pesticides/herbicides, genetically modified
organisms, and educating those interested in saving this earth by
re-educating our children in a way that enables them to be guardians of
our planet and not destroyers, is my focus. I hold four degrees, BS, MA,
SPED, and ED.D. I have written and researched for over 14 years. Susan
is currently developing a new website, but you can contact her by email
at:
suziestwo@aol.com
Copyright © 2015 Wake Up World.
http://wakeup-world.com/2015/07/30/beware-our-water-is-poisoned
|