Drone Debate to Pose 6 Basic Questions...and give answers you always wanted to knowLAS VEGAS — Drone vendors got special exhibition space just for them at this year's Consumer Electronics Show, a testament to the public's growing interest in the new product category and its awareness about pending regulations to both allow and control in the use of unmanned aircraft in U.S. skies. No longer confined to the military space, unmanned aerial vehicles are proliferating in all shapes, sizes and numbers. Those showcased at CES range from commercial drones – big and sturdy enough for Amazon package delivery – to toy mini-drones priced at less than $150. One drone that got lots of attention was presented by AirDog. The company started its drone project with a Kickstarter campaign last summer. It has now developed a wrist-worn “leash” that makes the drone follow its “master.” AirDog isn’t the only drone company taking its cue from the growing selfie boom. Other suppliers such as Hexo+, Zano, Trace, and Ghost also pitched “follow-me” features. Increasingly clear to those in the electronics industry is that drones are no longer just a gadget fad. As Henri Seydoux, the founder and CEO of Parrot, once told EE Times, “they are toys that are as serious and as well-designed as cars." Critical to enabling the drones to be reliable and accessible are advancements in sensors. Seydoux told us, “Without MEMS, drones wouldn’t have been where they are today.” Indeed, today’s drones are loaded with MEMs. They include an image sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, barometer, magnetometer, and GPS. Chip companies join the fray By using its own RealSense technology, Intel demonstrated drones that can build 3D maps of their surroundings and automatically adjust — like bats — to avoid objects. Qualcomm showed off a drone that can see in 3D, drive and fly. Based on the Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset, Snapdragon Cargo features an integrated flight controller capable of wireless communications, sensor integration and spatial positioning. Dark clouds looming? Complicating the matter further, drone innovations are mounting much faster than the regulatory process. Critics say that strict regulations could put the nascent drone industry in danger of grinding to a halt. However, if the panel discussion on drones at CES is any indications both drone entrepreneurs and government officials appear to agree that what they want is not “no regulations.” Rather, they want a framework with “simplicity and clarity,” as described by Tony Carmean, a founding partner and the chief marketing officer for Aerial MOB. Carmean, responsible for developing unmanned aerial cinematography for the Aerial MOB business model, played a key role in the company's successful bid to become one of the first to receive an FAA exemption to use unmanned aircraft for closed-set film productions. Following are key questions on current and future drone regulations raised by the panel and the audience, with some answers by the panelists. 1. Why do we even need regulations for drones? One key reason driving the regulations is the possibility of drones colliding with low-flying planes or tall humans. The threat of drones to airline pilots is real. According to a New York Times’ report, the FAA receives reports nearly every day about drones sighted near manned aircraft or airports. The article quoted Ben Berman at a recent forum hosted by the Air Line Pilots Association saying: As a (Boeing) 737 captain, I'll be damned if myself and 178 other people are taken down by a 12-pound or a 50-pound or a 150-pound piece of metal coming through my windshield...There are too many near misses occurring every day like this. Jim Williams, the manager of the FAA’s Unmanned Aircraft System Integration Office, explained during the CES panel that the FAA isn’t against drones but is concerned with safety. The agency is encouraging the new tech sector during its rulemaking by granting exceptions for interested companies that pledge to meet safety guidelines. The FAA already has exemptions to companies including film producers, such as Aerial MOB. Williams said, “We are now up to 15 permissions granted,” Williams said. “We are also in the process of streamlining in and accelerating that effort, because we now have over 200 applications for those permissions." To critics who complain that the FAA is too slow to grant exemptions, Williams acknowledged that the cumbersome process derives from the way laws are written. Under current regulations, Williams explained that drones can’t fly higher than 400 feet in a controlled area. To make matters more complex, [drone] operators must be licensed pilots, the devices have to be inspected and fly within line of sight of the operator. Flights in a different area must be approved anew by the FAA. The FAA’s exemption process is, in essence, set up for exception to existing rules, making each exemption its own miniature rule, explained Williams. 2. What about consumer drones? In FAA lingo, consumer or toy drones are described as “model aircraft.” It’s important to note that hobby or recreational flying doesn't require FAA approval. FAA’s Williams said during the panel discussion that the most important point for consumers is “to know safety guidelines before they fly consumer drones,” because common sense still applies:
FAA’s Williams said, “Enforcement is not our emphasis. We need more consumer education.” Several bills have been introduced in Congress to regulate the use of drones. The FAA is yet to sort out ambiguities in current regulations. But meanwhile, companies such as 3D Robotics, DJI and Parrot all want to make sure that regulation of recreational drones proves unnecessary. Henri Seydoux, founder and CEO of Parrot, said, “A consumer drone is not dangerous by itself.” Provoking the audience, he said that consumer “drones are as dangerous as birds.” FAA’s Williams responded he hasn’t seen any scientific studies comparing the danger presented by drones to small birds or big birds. Seydoux, quickly, explained that his company knows how to navigate regulations and follow rules. “We’ve worked with a number of other industries – such as the toy industry – that are heavily regulated. 3. What are the current rules for commercial or business drones? Under the current regulations, all drone operations for commercial or business purposes are subject to FAA regulation. Contrary to a prevailing myth in some quarters, there is no wiggle room for a vehicle that’s small and operated over private property and below 400 feet. According to the FAA, “at a minimum, any such flights require a certified aircraft and a certificated pilot. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operations for commercial or business purposes cannot be operated under the special rule for model aircraft.” While Congress exempted drone hobbyists from regulation when it passed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act in 2012, it calls for “safe integration” of public and commercial drones (those used for law enforcement, filmmaking, pipeline inspection, real estate surveys, pesticide application, etc.) by 2015. The FAA, however, is taking a phase-in approach, with proposed rules expected for the smallest class of commercial drones (under 55 pounds) by the end of the year. While requiring drone operators to be certified pilots isn’t exactly intuitive, it’s believed to be a part of the future regulations. Other expected rules for commercial drones include a requirement for drone pilots to file flight plans, and to submit their aircraft for certification and regular inspections. 4. How much airspace does the FAA exactly control? A question posed by Chris Anderson, chief executive of 3D Robotics, a recreational drone maker, is how much airspace the FAA controls. Is there any specific altitude in the airspace where the FAA is responsible for air safety? Does the FAA control airspace below 400 feet? FAA’s Williams explained that the FAA is responsible for air safety in “all the navigable airspace -- from the ground up -- including your backyard.” Even on street level? Yes. Consider the landing of aircraft for emergency rescue operations. As current regulations read, the FAA has broad authority to protect individuals and property on the ground and to prevent collisions between aircraft, between aircraft and land or water vehicles, and between aircraft and airborne objects. Consistent with its authority, the FAA has regulations that govern the operation of all aircraft, manned or unmanned, regardless of altitude. 5. How does a “see-and-avoid” principle apply to drones? FAA’s Williams reminded that a bedrock principle of aviation is “see and avoid.” Pilots must be able to see and steer clear of other objects in the sky, he said. This is precisely something that today’s drones cannot do. Sure, drones come with cameras. Drone vendors say that they’re working on substitute technologies. Some are even bringing up the use of sonar for obstacle avoidance. In reality, most drone models are too small to carry radar, transponders and anti-collision systems that spare regular planes from crashes. Radio transmissions that control navigation are vulnerable to interference and hacking. Many consumer drones are prone to flights that vanish and stop responding to commands. If drones ever hope to populate the U.S. skies, they will have to feature technology and standards for sensing and consistently avoiding other air traffic, even when communications are lost. Breakthrough?
Those drones flew through a “game of drones” obstacle course set up by Intel. Drones using Intel-developed RealSense — a system of camera hardware and software — saw obstacles and avoided collisions. Working with German industrial drone maker Ascending Technologies, Intel attached six RealSense cameras to Ascending Technologies’ AscTec Firefly. Ascending contributed a custom PCI-express interface board and used a quad-core Intel Atom processor to run algorithms, process depth information, real-time sensor data fusion and near-field obstacle avoidance. Communication between RealSense and the AscTec Trinity autopilot system enabled AscTec Fly to achieve an “see and avoid” capability thusfar impossible for all other existing drones. While this isn’t the whole “sense and avoid” solution that drones desperately need (other companies are also working on these technologies), Intel’s demo suggested a path to the future for unmanned aircraft. Driverless car vs. unmanned aircraft http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?piddl_msgid=334473&doc_id=1325334 |