The media broadly praised President Obama's sixth State of the Union
address last night as a "confident" and "ambitious" speech. But even
his traditional allies in the press could not ignore the fact that
it was a confident speech completely disconnected from the real
world.
Here is NBC's Andrea Mitchell, the network's senior foreign policy
correspondent,
on last night's speech: "I think that on
foreign policy, his projection of success against terrorism and
against ISIS, in particular, as I said, is not close to reality."
Chris Matthews, the adoring Obama supporter who once said Mr.
Obama's charisma made him feel "this thrill going up my leg,"
commented after last night's speech, "I keep
thinking tonight that there is a world out there that he didn't
really talk about." That's putting it gently.
Richard Engel, NBC's chief foreign correspondent, delivered the most
devastating analysis of the President's claims:
"It seems that the rose-colored glasses through which [President
Obama] was viewing the foreign policy were so rose-colored that they
don't even reflect the world that we're living in ... ISIS is doing
very well, and the strategy is completely disjointed ... To sell
that as a success, I think was missing the point, maybe even
disingenuous."
Engel
elaborated:
"It sounded like the President was outlining a world that he wishes
we were all living in but is very different from the world
[described in the news], with terror raids taking place across
Europe, with ISIS very much on the move. One thing the President
said was that 'American leadership, including our military power, is
stopping ISIL's advance.' That just isn't the case..."
"He talked about building support for the moderate Syrian
opposition. That effectively isn't happening. There is no real
support for the moderate Syrian opposition. In fact, one military
official told me that they are calling the moderate Syrian
opposition the 'unicorn' because they have not been able to find it.
So there was a general tone, maybe even suspended disbelief, I think
when he started talking about foreign policy. There's not a lot of
success stories to be talking about in foreign policy right now."
Even senior members of the President's own party have been unable to
stomach some of the President's claims. Democratic Senator Bob
Menendez, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, this morning described the President's quotes on Iran as
"sound[ing] like talking points that come straight out of Tehran."
What was striking about President Obama's speech was his inability
to describe radical Islamism as a movement.
He continues to focus on geography instead of ideology. He refers
only to "violent extremism."
He continues to bounce from terror group to terror group as though
they're distinct threats. The current conversation is about ISIL (or
ISIS) in Northern Syria and Iraq.
The President failed to mention Boko Haram, however, which last year
killed more people in Nigeria (10,000) than Ebola did in all of
Africa (8,000). To her credit, Senator Joni Ernst, in a very short
reaction speech, did mention Nigeria as a trouble spot.
Ironically, the front pages of today's newspapers report the State
of the Union on one side and the battle in the capital of Yemen on
the other side. Yemen is a country President Obama had cited as a
model of how we are making progress against "violent extremists."
Today the Yemeni president "cannot leave his house," according to
the Associated Press, because Islamist rebels are holding him
"captive" in his home. The country got no mention last night.
The state of the union, on national security matters at least, is a
disaster. A president who tries to hide from the threats we face —
or worse, to construct his own world in which they don't exist — is
making the planet a much more dangerous place. One with "confidence"
disconnected from reality isn't showing leadership. He's showing
pure foolishness.