Research Proves Causation—Sugar
Consumption Increases Risk for Chronic Disease
January 25, 2015
Story at-a-glance
Evidence clearly shows that refined sugar is a
primary factor causing not just obesity, but also
chronic yet preventable disease
In one clinical trial, test subjects who consumed
high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) developed higher
risk factors for cardiovascular disease in just two
weeks
On average, sugar makes up 15 percent of total
calories consumed. Overloading your liver with more
sugar than it can safely metabolize leads to chronic
metabolic disease
What is the proper role of sugar in our society? It used to
be a condiment; now it’s a diet staple. Mounting evidence
clearly shows that refined sugar is a primary factor causing not
just obesity, but also chronic disease.
According to Dr. Robert Lustig, Professor of Pediatric
Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco
(USCF), sugar acts as a chronic, dose-dependent liver toxin
(poison) when consumed in excess.
You might recognize Dr. Lustig from one of the most popular
YouTube videos on sugar that has over 5 million views. You might
also have seen him on
60 Minutes, which ran a report on the dangers of sugar in
2012.
You might also have seen him sparring with Stephen Colbert or
Bill Maher. Or you might know him from his book, Fat Chance.
Never before have humans consumed as much sugar as we do
today, and the ramifications of this dietary change are quite
clear. Fructose, found in most processed foods, is by far the
worst form of sugar, causing the greatest amount of harm in the
shortest amount of time.
For example, in one clinical trial, test subjects who
consumed
high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) developed higher risk
factors for cardiovascular disease in just two weeks.
Chronic Disease Has Risen in Lockstep with Sugar Consumption
Historically, sugar was used as a condiment. As early as 1200
BC, India developed a process to extract cane juice, called
khanda, which is where we got the word “candy” from.
"It was for nobility and it was hard to come by,
until about year 1700, when the pot still allowed for mass
production of refined sugar. It was still extraordinarily
expensive until the middle of 18th -19th century," Dr.
Lustig says.
"At that point, we started seeing it appearing in
various venues. We started seeing the growth of American
sugar industry in Louisiana, Texas, and Hawaii. That's when
we started seeing chronic metabolic disease.
In fact, the very first demonstration of an increase
in chronic metabolic disease was in 1924, when Hayden
Emerson, the commissioner of health of New York City,
noticed a seven-fold increase in diabetes rate in the
[city’s] population.
Then in 1931, Dr. Paul Dudley White
(cardiologist at Massachusetts General Hospital) called
attention to the fact that we had an epidemic of heart
disease.
Finally, in 1988, we learned about the advent of
adolescent type 2 diabetes. These are the three seminal
hallmarks of chronic metabolic disease pervading our
population. It goes up in lockstep with our increase in per
capita sugar consumption.”
The bottom line is that sugar used to be something we added
to coffee and tea. We had full control over the amount we ate.
Today, we consume about 20 times more sugar than our ancestors
did, and we have very little control over the amount since it’s
become a diet staple.
It’s now found in virtually every processed food you can
think of. On average, sugar makes up 15 percent of total
calories consumed (about 19.5 teaspoons per day), and your
liver, which processes sugar, simply cannot handle that kind of
load. When you overload your liver in this way, you inevitably
end up with chronic metabolic disease.
"Basically, sugar is metabolized virtually
identically to that of alcohol, and we are now seeing
diseases in children that we never saw before, and they are
alcohol-related diseases, like non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease and type 2 diabetes.
Kids don’t drink alcohol but they certainly consume
sugar, and that’s the point,” Dr. Lustig says.
“Sugar is the alcohol of the child. And we are all
overdosed.
We have gone beyond our limits and we are now
evidencing a massive increase in chronic metabolic disease
that is chewing through the health care resources of every
developed and developing country on the planet, and this is
unsustainable."
Insulin Resistance—A Hallmark of Metabolic Syndrome
According to Dr. Lustig, whatever organ becomes insulin
resistant ends up manifesting its own chronic metabolic disease.
For example, when you have insulin resistance of the liver, you
end up with type 2 diabetes.
When you have insulin resistance of the brain, you end up
with
Alzheimer’s disease. Insulin resistance of the kidney leads
to chronic renal disease, and so forth. All of these diseases
are insulin resistant states. The question is what causes the
insulin resistance in the first place?
"[W]e have some new data that we are very excited
about, which demonstrate that if you overload the
mitochondria, the little energy-burning factories within
cells, in any given organ, you'll end up manifesting various
forms of chronic metabolic disease," Dr. Lustig says.
“The chemical that overloads the mitochondria best is
trans-fats. But the chemical that overloads the mitochondria
next best is sugar. Trans fats and sugar pretty much
characterize the processed food diet.”
In November 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
removed trans fats from the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)
list. This is a step in the right direction. Unfortunately,
instead of reverting back to healthy saturated fats like coconut
oil, lard, and butter, trans fats have been replaced with other
non-saturated vegetable oils, that when heated, produce toxic
aldehydes which cause cellular damage.
We may not realize the full ramifications of this switch
until a decade or two down the line. Sugar, on the other hand,
is going to be even more difficult to dislodge from the food
system.
According to SugarScience.org, added sugars hide in 74
percent of processed foods under more than 60 different names.1
And yet, getting rid of the excess sugar in processed food is
exactly what needs to be done.
"As long as sugar is on that (GRAS) list, the food
industry has license to use as much as it wants to in any
given food stuff. So, sugar has become the biggest problem
in our diet since the advent of trans fats," Dr. Lustig
says. "Granted, there are many problems with processed
food. There's too much of five things and too little of
three things.
There's too much trans fats; too much omega-6 fatty
acids (which are pro-inflammatory); too much branched-chain
amino acids (which also overload your liver and cause
chronic metabolic disease)... too much alcohol, and too much
sugar.
On the too-little side, there's too little fiber, too
few micronutrients, and too little omega-3 fatty acids,
which are anti-inflammatory. Processed food has a zillion
things wrong with it. Unfortunately, processed food is what
we subsidize. Processed food is what we expect people to
consume because of 1) expense and 2) shelf life. That’s
making a fortune for the food industry, but it’s killing
us.”
Is There a Safe Threshold for Sugar?
According to Dr. Lustig, trans fats are “without question
consumable poison.” But is sugar as bad or worse than trans fat?
Dr. Lustig says no, it’s not worse, because while there is no
threshold at which trans fats are safe, there may be a threshold
below which sugar will not cause a problem. While there are
individual differences, as a general rule the safety threshold
for sugar appears to be around six to nine teaspoons (25-38
grams) of added sugar per day.
“That’s what the data suggest, because your liver
does have the capacity to metabolize fructose, as long as
the mitochondria don’t get overwhelmed,” Dr. Lustig
says. “So as long as you keep it below the threshold,
above which toxicity would occur, I think that, probably,
sugar is okay.”
Whether or not you're insulin resistant will play a role, as
insulin resistance generates hyperinsulinemia. Hyperinsulinemia
means that there's more insulin at the fat cell, which means
you'll shunt more energy into those fat cells because that's
what insulin does. Insulin resistance is clearly associated with
weight gain. But while many believe that insulin resistance is
the result of weight gain, recent data argues against
that notion, Dr. Lustig says. Instead, the data shows that
insulin is what drives the weight gain.
When your liver turns excess sugar into liver fat and becomes
insulin resistant, that generates hyperinsulinemia, and
hyperinsulinemia drives energy storage into body fat.
Currently, about two-thirds of the American population is
overweight. About one-quarter to one-third is diabetic or
prediabetic, and another quarter of the population is
hypertensive. Many also have high serum triglycerides. Insulin
resistance is a component of all of these health
issues. According to Dr. Lustig, the data shows that at least 50
percent of Americans have some form of insulin
resistance—whether you’re overweight or not—and that is
what’s driving our seemingly out-of-control disease statistics.
Metabolic Disease in America
As Dr. Lustig notes, if you were to do a Venn diagram2,3
of the United States population, you'd have 240 million adults
in that diagram, divided into two circles. One circle would be
about twice as big as the other: the obese population forming a
smaller circle of about 30 percent, and the non-obese population
forming a larger circle of about 70 percent. Eighty percent (57
million people) of the obese population is metabolically ill.
They have insulin resistance that manifests itself in a myriad
of ways, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia,
heart disease, cancer, and dementia.
"The standard mantra is, 'If they would just diet and
exercise, they wouldn't be obese and we could solve this
problem,'" Dr. Lustig says. "This is patently
untrue. It is true that 80 percent of the obese population
is metabolically ill. But that means that 20 percent of the
obese population is not. They're metabolically healthy. They
are called metabolically healthy obese. They will live a
completely normal life, die at a completely normal age, and
not cost the taxpayer a dime. They are just fat. They're not
contributing to our runaway medical train, as it were."
Conversely, it turns out that of the 70 percent that are of
normal weight (168 million people), 40 percent of them (67
million people) have insulin resistance on lab testing, and they
manifest aspects of the metabolic syndrome as well. They too get
type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular
disease, cancer, and dementia. The prevalence of metabolic
disease among normal weight people is not as great as among
obese people—40 percent versus 80 percent—but they do get ill
and there are far more people in this group.
“When you do the math, there are more thin sick
people than there are fat sick people,” Dr. Lustig says.
“The thin sick people are actually costing more, and when
you do the math on the two together, the sick population is
124 million—that’s more than half of the US adult
population. It turns out the thin sick people are costing us
more...
And you can't attribute this to gluttony and sloth or
diet and [lack of] exercise, because they're normal weight.
If it's not about behavior, then there's only one other
option: it must be about exposure. This is an exposure that
obese people are exposed to and it's an exposure that even
normal weight people are exposed to. That is called the
Western diet. The Western diet is replete with sugar. Sugar
is mechanistically the thing that drives this insulin
resistance."
How Do You Resolve Insulin Resistance?
The answer can be summarized in two words: real food.
According to Dr. Lustig, the overwhelming majority, 60-70
percent of the patients seen in his clinic are there as a result
of their processed food diet.
"What we have to do is we have to move them back [to
real food], and what we do is we explain what real food is.
A lot of kids don't even know what real food is. A lot of
kids think that fruit flavored yogurt is real food; it is
not. We explain that
yogurt is sour milk [it's not sweet]... So if you want
yogurt, have plain yogurt and throw whole fruit in, just
like what Europeans do. That's called real food."
Intermittent fasting may be another way to address insulin
resistance. Although Dr. Lustig doesn’t think most people have
to go this far, he believes it can work for some. When you fast,
your liver burns off the available liver fat. So you’re
temporarily depleting your liver fat stores, restoring metabolic
stability to your liver and improving hepatic insulin
sensitivity. That said, he believes that the long-term answer
for most people lies simply in eating real food.
"I think you can do this rationally, by eating
properly all the way through the week rather than having to
do intermittent fasting. I think, ultimately, the goal is
get the liver fat down. And since the cause of the liver fat
is dietary sugar, via the process of De novo lipogenesis...
once you get rid of the sugar, the liver fat will go down,
and we have data that supports that, both in adults and in
children... I think, ultimately, what you have to do is get
the liver fat down. Will intermittent fasting do that? Yes,
it will. But will eating properly do that too? It does it
even better," he says.
"What we tell people are these very simple rules, all
of which are evidence-based: get rid of every sugared
beverage in the house. Then, eat your carbohydrate with
fiber. Whole food is okay because the fiber mitigates the
negative effects of the fructose on hepatic metabolism,
because it reduces the rate of absorption... We don't tell
people they can't eat sugar. But they have to eat sugar in a
form that nature provided it, and it's called whole fruit."
The Importance of Exercise
Exercise is also an important component. Interestingly, Dr.
Lustig notes that exercise works not by promoting weight loss;
rather its benefits are related to the fact that exercise
promotes muscle gain. It may be a fine distinction, but one
worth noting nonetheless. There is a transcription factor known
as Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator
1-alpha (PGC-1α), which is involved in mitochondrial biogenesis.
When you turn up PGC-1α, you make more mitochondria. Increasing
your sympathetic muscle tone. This is what exercise does, it
turns on PGC-1α. So, in short, exercise increases muscle mass,
which increases mitochondria, and this in turn improves insulin
sensitivity.
"Every doctor who tells their patient, 'Well, if
you'd exercise, you'd lose weight.' Given what we know now,
this statement is tantamount to malpractice, because it
isn’t true. There are no studies that show [exercise leads
to weight loss]. Yet, exercise is the
single best thing you can do for yourself and we should be
promoting it, but we have to explain to patients what the
outcome variable they should be looking at is. And the
outcome variable is belt size [waist
size], because they will reduce their visceral fat. They
will lose inches, not pounds. And losing inches means
improved metabolic health," Dr. Lustig explains.
Research Proves Causation—Sugar Definitely Increases Risk for
Disease
At present, there are 15 agencies and 51 separate agreements
controlling food regulatory activities in the US, and according
to Dr. Lustig, “no one knows what the other hand is doing, and
the food industry takes complete advantage of this.” Dr. Lustig
and many others are pushing for a national food policy. He also
insists that “it’s time for us to take food back as a mode of
therapy.” And if food is medicine, doctors really must be taught
a thing or two about nutrition...
“We have the data. We don’t have correlation anymore.
Now, we have causation. We have causation
for sugar and obesity (although sugar is not the only
cause). We have causation for sugar and diabetes, for heart
disease, and for fatty liver disease... We now have
causation. It’s time to do something about it.”
For example, a paper by Yang, et al, published in JAMA
Internal Medicine last year looked at consumption of added
sugar over two decades, as a percentage of total calories,
concluding that it significantly contributed to cardiovascular
deaths. People who consumed 30 percent of their daily calories
as added sugar (like many teenagers are) had a four-fold greater
risk of dying from heart disease.
"If you think we got a problem now, wait until our
teenagers hit heart disease age; things are really going to
be even worse shortly," he notes. "Food should
confer wellness, not illness, and it used to. But then, the
food industry got involved. And now it confers illness, not
wellness. We have to take back our food."
To counter the propaganda provided by profit-driven industry
interests, dozens of scientists at three American
universities—including Dr. Lustig—have created a new educational
website called SugarScience.org,4
aimed at making independent research available to the public. To
learn more about what the science really says about sugar, I
highly recommend browsing through the site.