Last year’s (2014 to 2015) flu vaccine was just 18
percent effective among adults, and only 15 percent
among children aged 2 to 8
One of the most widely circulating influenza A
strains mutated early in the season, leaving those
who had gotten a flu shot with the belief that they
were protected when they were not
This year, the CDC is still actively promoting the
flu shot for Americans, despite its continuing
dismal track record of failure
By Dr. Mercola
Last year's (2014 to 2015) flu season was said to be one of
the worst in years… and the flu vaccine, widely pushed by public
health organizations as the best way to prevent
influenza, was a
major failure.
In January 2015, data from the US Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) revealed the flu vaccine was only 23
percent effective last year, which means many people who
received it believed they were protected from getting influenza
but were not.
By February, public health officials had lowered the
predicted effectiveness to just 18 percent and only 15 percent
among children aged 2 to 8 – for the inactivated, injectable flu
shot.1
The inhaled live virus nasal spray flu vaccine fared even worse,
showing potentially no benefit for young children.2
It got so bad that, in January 2015, the CDC finally issued a
warning saying the 2014 to 2015 flu vaccine was a poor match to
the influenza A strain causing most cases of influenza that
season.
It turned out the H3N2 strain had mutated, but health
officials still urged people to get a flu shot, claiming the
vaccine can make symptoms less severe without providing evidence
that this is true.
In June 2015, research was published in Cell Reports
showing that, indeed, the influenza A virus that had widely
circulated during the 2014 to 2015 flu season had mutated.
However, that mutation was not factored in when the vaccine was
developed in early 2014.3
But don't worry… the CDC is confident this year's vaccine will
work much better.
Health Officials Were Confident in Last Year's Flu Vaccine…
It's déjà vu. Flash back to September 2014, and the CDC was
hard at work telling adults not to forget to get their annual
flu shot – and to make sure to get their children vaccinated
too. This, CDC Director Tom Frieden said, would be "The best
way to protect yourself against the flu..."4
Both the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics even went
so far as to say the live virus nasal spray version was the
preferred vaccine for healthy children ages 2 to 8 because
research showed it worked a little better for them than the
inactivated injected vaccine.
Children were given two doses to inhale initially so,
theoretically, they could quickly build immunity.5
But it turned out the nasal spray flu vaccine was a bigger
failure than injectable flu shots.
The flu vaccine is (and was) also widely recommended for
pregnant women. It was around this time last year that a study
came out in the New England Journal of Medicine stating
the flu vaccine provided partial protection against confirmed
influenza in pregnant women and their infants.6
The media began touting headlines like "flu vaccine safe for
pregnant women," and one news outlet, News 4 Jax, even quoted
about maternal-fetal medicine, with Dr. Erin Burnett saying,
"All pregnant women should get the vaccine because it's 100
percent safe in pregnancy."7
This is quite a statement, since even the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) lists influenza (and Tdap) vaccines as
either Pregnancy Category B or C biologicals, which means that
adequate testing has not been done in humans to demonstrate
safety for pregnant women, and it is not known whether the
vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect reproduction capacity.8
After the CDC's aggressive promotion of flu shots for
children, the elderly, healthy adults and pregnant women last
year, we know how the story turned out – the flu vaccine was,
once again, a major flop.
After Epic Failure, CDC Says This Year's Flu Vaccine Will Be
Better
Fast forward to 2015, and the CDC is singing the same tune
all over again. In September 2015 Frieden said in a news
conference, "Get vaccinated… That's the best way to protect
yourself, your family and your community against flu."9
A CDC analysis reportedly has found that the most common
strains of influenza virus circulating in the US and in other
regions match the strains included in this year's vaccine.10,11
Jessica Rigler, bureau chief for epidemiology and disease
control at the Arizona Department of Health Services, told KPHO
News:12
"We expect it [the 2015 flu vaccine] to be much more
effective than last year's flu vaccine… If healthcare
providers and vaccine providers are following the proper
procedures, all of last year's flu vaccine should be off the
shelves… Everybody who's eligible should get flu shot…
That's anyone 6 months of age or older."
I'm amazed at the tenacity with which health care providers
will push these questionable vaccines. I don't visit "regular"
physicians often but am required to do so once every two years
or so for insurance purposes.
Even now, two years later, I'm still receiving phone
calls, emails, and text messages from this health care provider
reminding me to get my annual flu shot!
But remember, what happened last year was the most common
circulating influenza A strain making people sick mutated near
the beginning of the season.
How can vaccine regulators and policymakers claim to know that
this won't happen again? Influenza viruses are notorious for
undergoing mutations and what's to stop that from happening
again this year?
Not to mention, last year certainly wasn't the first time the
flu vaccine had a dismal effectiveness rate. The "gold standard"
of independent evaluation and analysis of scientific evidence
that a particular medical intervention actually works.
The
Cochrane Database Review, has issued no less than five
reports between 2006 and 2010, all of which debunk the myth that
flu vaccinations are "the most effective flu prevention method"
available.
In average conditions, when a flu vaccine at least partially
matches the circulating virus, 100 people need to be vaccinated
in order to avoid just ONE set of influenza symptoms, according
to Cochrane's findings. A meta-analysis published in The
Lancet Infectious Diseases similarly concluded:13
"Influenza vaccines can provide moderate protection
against virologically confirmed influenza, but such
protection is greatly reduced or absent in some seasons."
After Regular Flu Shot Fails Them, Seniors Are Told to Get a
Higher Dose
Research has repeatedly shown that flu shots were not
protecting seniors. The Lancet even concluded,
"evidence for protection in adults aged 65 years or older is
lacking."14
The "solution" was to come out with a new, higher dose vaccine —
Fluzone High-Dose vaccine. It contains four times the amount
of antigen found in a standard dose.15
Research published last year showed it may lower the risk of
getting influenza by 24 percent among seniors compared to the
standard-dose vaccine.16
This still isn't saying much, considering during the 2012 to
2013 flu season the standard flu vaccine was just
9 percent effective in seniors aged 65 and over.
Even when getting a vaccine with four times the
dose, only one in four cases of influenza in older patients was
potentially prevented. It's unclear whether the vaccine actually
lowers the risk of influenza-related health complications and
deaths.
The idea is that seniors need much more antigen in order to
provoke the desired immune response, because studies have found
that the flu vaccine creates only a weak immune response in the
elderly. In essence, public health officials have realized that
the flu vaccine does not work in the elderly, and their belief
is that upping the dose will do the trick.
However, according to the manufacturer's safety studies,
compared to the regular flu vaccine the high-dose version not
only resulted in more frequent reports of common milder adverse
reactions, it also caused slightly higher rates of Serious
Adverse Events (SAEs).
A total of 6.1 percent of seniors injected with the regular
Fluzone vaccine experienced a serious adverse event compared to
7.4 percent of those receiving the high-dose version. According
to the package insert, the SAEs reported during the
post-approval use of the vaccine include:17
Thrombocytopenia (abnormally low platelet count,
which can result in abnormal bleeding)
Vasculitis (inflammatory destruction of blood
vessels)
Difficulty breathing, shortness of breath
Chest pain
Brachial neuritis (excruciating unilateral shoulder
pain, followed by paralysis of shoulder)
Pharyngitis and rhinitis (inflammation of the throat
or pharynx, and the nose, respectively)
Convulsions, fainting, and dizziness
Are You Skeptical of Getting an Annual Flu Shot?
You're right to be skeptical about an annual vaccine with
this kind of questionable track record. Its effectiveness is
wholly dependent on the educated "guesses" of health officials
to choose the "right" influenza strains that circulate widely in
any given year to include in the vaccine. And then again, they
are banking on the hope that the virus won't mutate into a new
strain between the time the vaccine is developed in the spring
and when the "flu season" begins in the fall.
Even then, if all conditions are accounted for and
you've been vaccinated against the exact same influenza strain
you're likely to be exposed to in real life, the vaccine is not
100-percent effective. On a good year it may only be 60
percent effective.
In reality, during the past three flu seasons the CDC has
claimed the flu vaccine's overall effectiveness was between 47
percent and 62 percent, but some experts have measured it at 0
to 7 percent.18,19
Aside from the questions regarding effectiveness, are questions
regarding safety.
CDC officials direct doctors to give every child and adult in
America a flu shot every year, but studies suggest that
when children get a flu shot every year it can interfere with
healthy immune responses and make them more likely to get
influenza in certain flu seasons.20
Further, research presented at the 105th International
Conference of the American Thoracic Society in San Diego
revealed that children who get seasonal flu shots are more at
risk of hospitalization than children who do not. In fact,
children who had received the flu vaccine had three times the
risk of hospitalization as children who had not. Among children
with asthma, the risk was even higher.21
Separate research has also shown that the inactivated flu
vaccine has limited efficacy in young children, while the live
nasal vaccine leads to increased wheezing in children under 2
and increased hospitalization rates in infants aged 6 to 11
months.22
Data collected from Canada and Hong Kong during 2009 to 2010
showed that people who received the seasonal flu vaccine in 2008
had
twice the risk of getting the H1N1 "swine flu" compared to
those who hadn't received a flu shot.23,24,25
ABC News reported at that time how such shots may actually set
you up for less "broad" protection than if you get, and recover
from, a natural infection.26
Other side effects have also been reported, including
Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). In the video above, Barbara Loe
Fisher, co-founder and president of the non-profit National
Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), interviews a Connecticut
artist and her mother, a former professor of nursing, who
developed GBS after getting a seasonal flu shot in 2008 and
today is permanently disabled with total body paralysis.
Serious Questions Remain Unanswered…
For the past several years, physicians in America have been
insisting that every child age 6 months to 18 years must get an
annual flu shot. Making matters worse, public health officials
have since ramped up those recommendations, telling EVERY person
over the age of 6 months to get a flu shot, healthy or not,
pregnant or not, or low risk or high. With all of those
vaccinations, will you become more susceptible to
influenza-related complications and death? Will your rate of
hospitalization be increased… and will the flu shot even protect
you from the current year's circulating strains?
We really don't know, and that's a problem. Health officials
have leapt ahead with recommendations of "flu shots for all"
without adequate safety studies – so by getting a flu
vaccine, you are effectively offering yourself up as a
laboratory rat. In other words, you are the safety study!
There remain more questions than answers when it comes to
vaccinations, which is why we regularly see "mysterious" side
effects – like
narcolepsy – popping up after vaccinations enter widespread
use. It is also not widely understood that the artificial
immunity created by a vaccine is not the same as the natural
immunity you acquire from a natural infection.
When children are born, they develop natural immunity to a
large variety of microorganisms that they breathe, eat, and
touch. The immune responses initiated by cells lining their
airways, skin, and intestines are very important in creating
"memory" and protection against the microorganisms they
naturally come into contact with every day.
That primary line of defense is a very important step in the
maturation of your child's immune system – and it's bypassed
when he/she gets a vaccine. With vaccination, you are merely
creating an antibody, but as a Journal of Virology
study showed, unvaccinated children actually built up more
antibodies against a wider variety of flu virus strains than the
vaccinated children.27
And it's important to remember that although influenza
can be deadly, most people who become infected recover on
their own in two weeks or less with no complications and no
health care required – except for some rest, plenty of water and
maybe a cup of warm bone broth to make you feel better. Besides,
if you really want to stay healthy during the flu season – and
all year around - the statistics speak for themselves:
If you're relying solely on the flu vaccine to keep you from
getting sick, you're putting your health on the line. A strong
immune system remains the best defense against influenza and
other infectious diseases, and this can't be achieved by simply
relying on a shot. Healthy eating, exercise, sleep, stress, and
vitamin D levels are all factors that should be addressed to
keep you well this flu season. You can read about these and
other
natural ways to help fight and prevent the flu here.
Protect Your Right to Informed Consent and Defend Vaccine Exemptions
With all the uncertainty surrounding the safety and efficacy of
vaccines, it's critical to protect your right to make independent
health choices and exercise voluntary informed consent to
vaccination. It is urgent that everyone in America stand up and
fight to protect and expand vaccine informed consent protections in
state public health and employment laws. The best way to do this is
to get personally involved with your state legislators and educating
the leaders in your community.
THINK GLOBALLY, ACT LOCALLY.
National vaccine policy recommendations are made at the federal
level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the
state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights
can have the greatest impact.
It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up
for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America
because those choices are being threatened by lobbyists representing
drug companies, medical trade associations, and public health
officials, who are trying to persuade legislators to strip all
vaccine exemptions from public health laws.
Signing up for NVIC's free Advocacy Portal at
www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you immediate, easy access to your own
state legislators on your smart phone or computer so you can make
your voice heard. You will be kept up-to-date on the latest state
bills threatening your vaccine choice rights and get practical,
useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice
advocate in your own community. Also, when national vaccine issues
come up, you will have the up-to-date information and call to action
items you need at your fingertips.
Share Your Story with the Media and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine
reaction, injury, or death, please talk about it. If we don't share
information and experiences with one another, everybody feels alone
and afraid to speak up. Write a letter to the editor if you have a
different perspective on a vaccine story that appears in your local
newspaper. Make a call in to a radio talk show that is only
presenting one side of the vaccine story.
I must be frank with you; you have to be brave because you might
be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the "other side" of
the vaccine story. Be prepared for it and have the courage to not
back down. Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be
true about vaccination will the public conversation about
vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.
We cannot allow the drug companies and medical trade associations
funded by drug companies or public health officials promoting forced
use of a growing list of vaccines to dominate the conversation about
vaccination. The vaccine injured cannot be swept under the carpet
and treated like nothing more than "statistically acceptable
collateral damage" of national one-size-fits-all mandatory
vaccination policies that put way too many people at risk for injury
and death. We shouldn't be treating people like guinea pigs instead
of human beings.
Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the website of the non-profit charity,
the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at
www.NVIC.org:
NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims: View
descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have
suffered vaccine reactions, injuries, and deaths. If you or your
child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider
posting and sharing your story here.
Vaccine Freedom Wall: View or post
descriptions of harassment and sanctions by doctors, employers,
and school and health officials for making independent vaccine
choices.
Vaccine Failure Wall: View
or post descriptions about vaccines that have failed to work and
protect the vaccinated from disease.
Connect with Your Doctor or Find a New One That Will Listen and Care
If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical care to
you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I
strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another
doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal of medical care
is becoming the modus operandi of the medical establishment in an
effort to stop the change in attitude of many parents about
vaccinations after they become truly educated about health and
vaccination.
However, there is hope.
At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit that
they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to
vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of
parents. It is good news that there is a growing number of smart
young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making
personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying
vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or
continuing to provide medical care for those families, who decline
use of one or more vaccines.
So take the time to locate a doctor, who treats you with
compassion and respect and is willing to work with you to do what is
right for your child.