Hidden Science Reveals Major Tamiflu
Scam
October 21, 2015
Story at-a-glance
−
-
Drug makers hid a significant amount of negative data on
flu drug Tamiflu from the public
-
The Cochrane Collaboration put in a four-year effort,
including a Freedom of Information suit, to uncover the
hidden documents (all 160,000+ pages of them)
-
The uncovered evidence does not support claims that
Tamiflu lowers the risk of flu complications
-
The benefits of Tamiflu do not appear to outweigh the
risks or justify governments stockpiling the drug
By Dr. Mercola
Anti-viral flu drugs like Tamiflu (oseltamivir) are stockpiled in
many countries, including the US, for treating and preventing
seasonal and pandemic
influenza.
Influenza can be deadly, but if you're otherwise healthy,
it typically is a self-limiting illness that runs its course in a
few days and requires no treatment.
Historically speaking, there have been flu outbreaks, such as the
Hong Kong flu of 1968 to 1969, that were estimated to have killed
over 1 million people.
If a particularly lethal flu strain were to emerge, the idea behind
stockpiling is that governments would already have anti-viral flu
drugs at the ready so they could potentially save thousands, or
hundreds of thousands, of lives.
It sounds good in theory, but the reality is much less
convincing. The most glaring issue stems from the fact that the
available anti-viral drugs do not appear to be very effective at
fighting the flu and instead are associated with serious side
effects.
The US government has spent an estimated $1.3 billion to
stockpile Tamiflu, despite a review from the Cochrane Collaboration
that questioned the drug's effectiveness, and called the billions of
dollars spent to stockpile the drug a waste of money.1
Cochrane Review: Benefits of Anti-Viral Flu Drugs Do Not Outweigh
the Risks
The Cochrane Collaboration is considered to be the gold standard
in evidence-based reviews. Previous versions of their review on
anti-viral flu drugs revealed unresolved discrepancies in the
published trials, including "substantial publication bias."
While there were numerous studies on the topic, only a limited
number had been published.
As a result, the Cochrane Collaboration turned to a more
reputable source of data: complete clinical study reports. Clinical
study reports are "unpublished, extensive documents with great
detail on the trials that formed the basis for market approval."
Until recently, these documents were only available to
manufacturers and regulators, but, after a four-year effort,
including a Freedom of Information suit, the researchers were able
to assess these regulatory documents (all 160,000+ pages of them).
What they found was that the evidence does not support
claims that these drugs (Tamiflu and another anti-viral drug Relenza
[zanamivir]) lower the risk of complications from the flu (such as
pneumonia) or that the benefits outweigh the risks.2
Dr. Tom Jefferson, who led the study, noted, "I wouldn't give it
[Tamiflu] for symptom relief… I'd give paracetamol [Tylenol]."3
No Evidence to Support Claims That Tamiflu Reduces Viral
Transmission
The review also found no evidence to support claims that the
drugs help to reduce viral transmission, which undoubtedly is a key
reason why they would be stockpiled by the government.
The World Health Organization (WHO) even classifies Tamiflu as an
"essential" medicine, which they say are "selected with due regard
to public health relevance, evidence on efficacy and safety, and
comparative cost-effectiveness."4
But the review calls this into question and suggested WHO
consider dropping Tamiflu from its list of essential medicines,
noting "there is no credible way these drugs could prevent a
pandemic."5
The review revealed:6
- Both drugs shorten the duration of flu symptoms by less
than a day (specifically, by just 16.8 hours)
- Tamiflu did not affect the number of hospitalizations;
Relenza trials did not record this data
- The effects of the drugs on pneumonia and other flu
complications were unreliably reported and included limitations
in diagnostic criteria and problems with missing follow-up on
participants
- Tamiflu was associated with nausea, vomiting, headaches,
kidney problems, and psychiatric events, and may induce serious
heart rhythm problems
According to the researchers:7
"Based on our assessments of the regulatory documents (in
excess of 160,000 pages), we came to the conclusion that there
were substantial problems with the design, conduct, reporting,
and availability of information from many of the trials… We
identified problems in the design of many of the studies that we
included, which affects our confidence in their results."
A 2015 report compiled by the UK's Academy of Medical Sciences
also reviewed all available evidence on Tamiflu and concluded it's
not known whether Tamiflu would be useful during a pandemic flu
outbreak.
The team noted Tamiflu was handed out "indiscriminately" during
the last swine flu outbreak and may have done no good at all. They
added, "We really missed a trick… by not doing clinical trials
early on and just making assumptions."8
Drug Makers Hide Negative Data from the Public
The Cochrane review not only highlighted Tamiflu's lack of
effectiveness and side effects, and governments' wasted billions to
stockpile it. It also highlighted the fact that drug makers hid a
significant amount of negative data from the public. As Newsweek
reported:9
"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) knew about it,
but the medical community did not; the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), which doesn't have the same access
to unpublished data as regulators, had recommended the drug
without being able to see the full picture.
When results from those unpublished trials finally did
emerge, they cast doubt over whether Tamiflu is as effective as
the manufacturer says.
The revelation of hidden data bolstered a growing movement
against what's referred to within the research community as
'publication bias,' in which scientists squirrel away mostly
negative or inconclusive findings and broadcast only their
positive ones.
Concealing trial data — for which patients accept the
risks of untested treatments for the greater good — is routine.
As many as half of all clinical trials are never published,
PLOS Medicine reported…"10
In fact, while there are more than 182,000 trials registered on
ClinicalTrials.gov, fewer than 16,000 posted results in 2014.
Positive trials are twice as likely to be published as others.11
Further, even though the 2007 Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act (FDAAA 801) requires most trials to report a summary
of their results, 80 percent of trials do not comply with this
requirement (even though many are funded with taxpayer money). And
why should they? There have been no fines enforced for those that
fail to comply.12
Earlier this year the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released a
report, "Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits,
Minimizing Risk."13
IOM noted they had assembled a committee to "develop guiding
principles and a practical framework for the responsible sharing of
clinical trial data."
The report suggests data should be shared by funders and
sponsors, journals as a condition of publication, institutional
review boards, and universities. They also recommended data be
shared:14
- By posting on ClinicalTrials.gov (the protocol, research
questions, and plans for analysis)
- Within 12 months of completion and posted on a public
website
- At publication (or not later than six months after)
- By 18 months post-study, the full data set should be shared
along with the protocol
- Within 30 days for products that win regulatory approval
As it stands, however, there is no easy way for the public,
researchers, or medical professionals to review data from all
scientific studies done on any given topic, even those that are
publically funded.
Adding to the complexity of the issue (and the degradation of
scientific research), research shows when scientists are hired by a
drug's manufacturer they're more likely to report on it favorably
than those who are independent. Ironically, this study was also
involving Tamiflu, and found 88 percent of assessments associated
with a financial conflict of interest were classified as favorable
compared with 17 percent among those without a financial conflict of
interest.15
Did You Know Tamiflu Has Caused Bizarre Psychiatric Effects?
Tamiflu and Relenza are part of a group of anti-influenza drugs
called neuraminidase inhibitors, which work by blocking a viral
enzyme that helps the influenza virus to invade cells in your
respiratory tract. The problem is that your nervous system also
contains neuraminidase enzymes essential for proper brain
functioning, and when blocked with these dangerous drugs, severe
neurotoxicity may ensue (especially in the infants and children
whose blood-brain barrier has not yet developed sufficiently).
Serious side effects include convulsions, delirium or delusions,
and suicidal behavior, and at least 14 deaths in children and teens16
have been reported as a result of neuropsychiatric problems and
brain infections. Japan actually banned Tamiflu for children in 2007
because of the steep risks. It was also around this time that the US
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began reviewing reports of
abnormal behavior and other brain effects in more than 1,800
children who had taken Tamiflu.
17 You can decide for yourself whether these risks are
worth a measly 16.8-hour reduction in your flu symptoms:
| Nausea |
Vomiting |
| Diarrhea |
Headache |
| Dizziness |
Fatigue |
| Cough |
Neuropsychiatric disorders, including suicidal behavior,
hallucinations, seizures, delirium, and other behavioral
side effects (such as reports of children jumping off roofs
shortly after taking the drug) |
Here's How to Stay Well During Flu Season
A healthy immune system is the key to avoiding illnesses like the
flu; as long as your immune system can stay one step ahead of the
virus, you'll feel better again quickly… and in some cases may not
even know you were "sick." Toward that end, if your diet contains a
lot of refined sugars, grains, and processed foods, you're not doing
your body any favors.
Instead of giving your body the fuel it needs to function optimally,
which means being healthy enough to fight off infectious viruses,
you're giving it more toxic elements that it must overcome.
For instance, too many carbohydrates in the form of sugar and
grains are very unbalancing for your gut flora. Sugar is
"fertilizer" for pathogenic bacteria, yeast, and fungi that can set
your immune system up for an easy assault by a respiratory virus.
Most people don't realize that 80 percent of your immune system
actually lies in your gastrointestinal tract.
That's why controlling your sugar intake is crucial for optimizing
your immune system.
Additionally, making sure you're ingesting plenty of beneficial
bacteria in the foods you eat (specifically
fermented foods) is also crucial, as is optimizing and having
your
vitamin D level monitored to confirm your levels are at a
therapeutic 50 to 70 ng/ml year-round. I believe optimizing your
vitamin D levels is one of the most potent preventive strategies
available, followed by diet (including fermented foods to optimize
your gut flora), stress relief, exercise, and sleep.
There are other factors that can come into play too, of course.
The following guidelines will also act in concert to support your
immune system and help you
avoid getting sick. You can also read my
complete guide to fight the flu naturally here.
- Take a High-Quality Source of Animal-Based Omega-3
Fats. Increase your intake of healthy and essential
fats like the
omega-3 found in krill oil, which is crucial for maintaining
health. It is also vitally important to avoid damaged omega-6
oils (think vegetable oils), as it will seriously damage your
immune response.
- Wash Your Hands. Washing your hands will
decrease your likelihood of spreading a virus to your nose,
mouth, or other people. Be sure you don't use antibacterial soap
using synthetic chemicals for this – conventional antibacterial
soaps are completely unnecessary, and they cause far more harm
than good. Instead, identify a simple toxin-free soap that you
can switch your family to. Avoid overwashing your
hands, however, as this can lead to tiny cuts that allow an
entryway for pathogens.
- Tried-and-True Hygiene Measures. In
addition to washing your hands regularly, cover your mouth and
nose when you cough or sneeze, ideally with the crook of your
elbow (to avoid contaminating your hands). If possible, avoid
close contact with those who are sick and, if you are sick,
avoid close contact with those who are well.
- Use Natural Immune Boosters. Examples
include
oil of oregano and garlic, both of which offer effective
protection against a broad spectrum of bacteria, viruses, and
protozoa in your body. And unlike pharmaceutical antibiotics,
they do not appear to lead to resistance and the development of
"super germs."
- Avoid Hospitals. I'd recommend you stay
away from hospitals unless you're having an emergency and need
expert medical care, as hospitals are prime breeding grounds for
infections of all kinds. The best place to recover from illness
that is not life threatening is usually in the comfort of your
own home.
© Copyright 1997-2015 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/10/21/major-tamiflu-scam.aspx
|