Study calls for US natural gas pipeline replacement to reduce GHG
emissions
Houston (Platts)--22 Sep 2015 446 pm EDT/2046 GMT
As energy industry and government officials alike wrestle with the
best way to limit the release of methane into the atmosphere, a new
study reveals that US cities with programs calling for the replacement
of aging natural gas pipeline have 90% fewer leaks per mile than cities
without such programs.
The study, led by researchers from Stanford University and published in
the journal "Environmental Science & Technology Letters," demonstrates
"how well pipeline replacement programs have worked," Rob Jackson, the
study's author, said in an interview Monday.
Researchers studied programs to replace pipelines made of cast iron and
other outdated materials in three US regions, the cities of Durham,
North Carolina and Cincinnati, Ohio, and Manhattan Island in New York
City.
"We identified 132, 351 and 1,050 leaks in Durham, Cincinnati and
Manhattan, respectively, across 595, 750 and 247 road miles driven," the
study reported.
The release of the study coincides with a series of public hearings
the US Environmental Protection Agency is holding on proposed updates to
the agency's air rules for the oil and gas industry.
The proposals, designed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and
volatile organic compounds from industry sources, are part of the Obama
administration's Climate Action Plan to reduce methane emissions.
"Emissions during the production, processing, storage, transmission and
distribution of oil and gas were the second largest anthropogenic source
of methane to the atmosphere globally in 2013," the study found.
The report focused on methane emissions because methane's global warming
potential is 87 times greater than that of carbon dioxide over 20 years
and 36 times larger over 100 years.
The study found that programs to replace aging gas pipeline
infrastructure are expensive, particularly in dense urban environments
such as the three regions studied, with Manhattan having the highest
costs of all, Jackson said.
"Everything costs more in Manhattan compared with other cities; the
population density is higher, it costs more to dig up the streets," he
said.
Yet, even with the relatively high costs, such programs pay long-term
dividends in terms of safety and environmental benefits, Jackson said.
"Overall, our data show that investing over many years in pipeline
replacements will yield benefits for decades," he said.
Jackson said the researchers tried to provide data to help cities focus
their pipeline replacement programs on areas within cities that have the
highest incidence of methane leakage.
"We found some cities have more leaks than other cities and some
areas within cities have a lot more leaks than other areas," he said.
The scientists found that in some areas, the best predictor of leaks was
the presence of old cast-iron piping.
"The focus should be on cast iron and unprotected steel pipes. Many of
those pipes are 70 to 125 years old or more. Some of the older cast iron
pipes date back to the 1800s," Jackson said.
He added that cost is a very important variable in the success of
pipeline replacement programs, which often unfold over a period of
decades.
In addition, in many jurisdictions, regulators place a cap how much
money local gas distribution companies can recover on the replacement
and repair of pipelines.
"Companies have limits on what they can do. I'd like to see the public
utility commissions help the companies replace pipelines more quickly,"
Jackson said.
"In return for that, I think companies should stop being paid for
natural gas that leaks out of their pipelines. Consumers pay for that
lost gas," he said. "I think that would align the incentives to fix the
leaks more quickly."
For their part, the public utility regulators, many of whom are elected
on a statewide basis, "are in a tight place," Jackson said.
"They're judged on keeping costs low and yet they're also responsible in
part for repairs and replacements that companies can charge to
consumers," he said.
He noted that some states, such as Massachusetts, have passed laws
calling for accelerated pipeline replacement programs as a way to more
quickly address the safety and environmental issues associated with
aging pipeline infrastructure.
In addition, the Obama administration is discussing the introduction of
federal incentives under as part of its methane reduction plans.
"There are some carrots and I think there should be carrots. The
benefits are consumer safety, air quality, money savings and reductions
in greenhouse gas emissions, and you can also add job creation to the
mix," Jackson said.
--Jim Magill,
jim.magill@platts.com
--Edited by Keiron Greenhalgh,
keiron.greenhalgh@platts.com
© 2015 Platts, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.platts.com
http://www.platts.com/latest-news/natural-gas/houston/study-calls-for-us-natural-gas-pipeline-replacement-21167598
|