Apple files to vacate iPhone unlock ruling, says government seeking 'dangerous power'
Apple has filed its first legal response, after a court ruled it must assist the FBI in unlocking the San Bernardino shooter's iPhone.
Apple on Thursday filed a motion to vacate a court's order forcing the company to unlock the San Bernardino shooter's iPhone.
"In order to comply with the Gov't demands, Apple would need to create a new 'GovtOS'", the motion reads. Apple lays out the engineering resources that would be required.
The court is asking Apple to help the FBI brute force its way into a locked iPhone by creating a special version of iOS that will be easier for the government agency to get into.
legal showdown
FBI vs. Apple could make or break Silicon Valley
The FBI scores a game-changing win in the battle between tech firms and law enforcement over device access, setting legal precedent that may never be undone.
Apple listed its legal objections in the filing, setting the stage for a big legal showdown that has garnered mass media attention and attention from other technology giants.
"This is not a case about one isolated iPhone," the motion reads. "Rather, this case is about the Department of Justice and the FBI seeking through the courts a dangerous power that Congress and the American people have withheld: the ability to force companies like Apple to undermine the basic security and privacy interests of hundreds of millions of individuals around the globe."
This marks Apple's first legal response to the court's iPhone unlock order from early February. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, has penned two letters to customers and appeared on ABC News' Nightline program in defiance of the ruling.
On the program, Cook called the proposed backdoor the "software equivalent of cancer".
"No court has ever granted the government power to force companies like Apple to weaken its security systems to facilitate the government's access to private individuals' information," Apple wrote in Thursday's response. "The All Writs Act does not support such sweeping use of judicial power, and the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution forbid it."