Is it
Nibiru?
This cylinder seal, VA-243 in the Berlin Near Eastern
Museum, shows the sun in the center (!), surrounded by
eleven orbiting bodies that include the Moon, Pluto and
the yet to be recognized Planet X -- Nibiru.
|
|
There is more exciting scientific
news this week that corroborates Sitchin writings. Last week we
heard new evidence of the existance in our solar system of
another large planet, which might be Nibiru. This week Mathieu
Ossendrijver published an article in Science
magazine about a cuneiform tablet detailing the position of
Jupiter based on geometrical calculations by the Babylonians in
350-50 BCE. Europeans were able to do this in the 1400's.
Mathieu Ossendrijver
Science 29 Jan 2016:
Vol. 351, Issue 6272, pp. 482-484
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad808
Abstract:
"The idea of computing a body's displacement as an area in
time-velocity space is usually traced back to 14th-century
Europe. I show that in four ancient Babylonian cuneiform
tablets, Jupiter's displacement along the ecliptic is
computed as the area of a trapezoidal figure obtained by
drawing its daily displacement against time.This
interpretation is prompted by a newly discovered tablet on
which the same computation is presented in an equivalent
arithmetical formulation.The tablets date from 350 to 50
BCE.The trapezoid procedures offer the first evidence for
the use of geometrical methods in Babylonian mathematical
astronomy, which was thus far viewed as operating
exclusively with arithmetical concepts."
For more information, see the full article in Science:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/351/6272/482.full.pdf
J.Sitchin - January 29, 2016 |
|
Is it
Nibiru?
Regarding the January 19, 2016
publication of an article in The Astronomical Journal
about evidence for another large planet in our solar system in
the Kuiper Belt beyond Pluto, I wrote on January 20:
With an elliptical orbit of 10,000 or 20,000 of our years,
this planet may not be Nibiru, which has an orbit of about
3600 of our years. However, this prediction of a likely
additional planet in our solar system is exciting news.
Perhaps the search will lead us to either finding Nibiru, or
perhaps we'll find that something has changed and impacted
Nibiru's orbit since the last time it orbited Earth. I have
my doubts, but since I'm not an astronomer, I'll keep an
open mind. I don't think this is Nibiru.
J.Sitchin - January 20, 2016
Orbit Update
After speaking with my father,
Amnon Sitchin, brother to Zecharia Sitchin, PhD in Aeronautical
and Mechanical Engineering, and also the person who calculated
the orbit of Nibiru for my uncle Zecharia, I found an
interesting piece of news based on some additonal calculations
he did this week:
If Nibiru's orbit of 3600 years was circular rather than
elliptical, it would have an orbit of about 10,000 years.
Yes, you heard that right. I don't know whether the CalTech
astronomers based their estimated orbital period on a circular
or elliptical orbit. However, this tidbit means that I should
not dismiss this planet as being Nibiru based on this estimated
orbital time frame. I obviously need to learn more about
planetary motion and astronomy to make any conclusions myself.
I'm hoping that we can learn more and either find that this is
Nibiru or that the search for this new planet helps us find
Nibiru too.
J.Sitchin - January 27, 2016
|
|
Evidence For a Distant Giant Planet in
the Solar System
Konstantin Batygin and Michael E.
Brown
Published 2016 January 20 © 2016. The American Astronomical
Society. All rights reserved. The Astronomical Journal, Volume
151, Number 2
The following is the abstract of
the article in The Astrononomical Journal on the
subject of the new findings regarding another planet in our
solar system.
"Recent analyses have shown that distant orbits within the
scattered disk population of the Kuiper Belt exhibit an
unexpected clustering in their respective arguments of
perihelion. While several hypotheses have been put forward
to explain this alignment, to date, a theoretical model that
can successfully account for the observations remains
elusive. In this work we show that the orbits of distant
Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs) cluster not only in argument of
perihelion, but also in physical space. We demonstrate that
the perihelion positions and orbital planes of the objects
are tightly confined and that such a clustering has only a
probability of 0.007% to be due to chance, thus requiring a
dynamical origin. We find that the observed orbital
alignment can be maintained by a distant eccentric planet
with mass >~ 10m whose orbit lies in approximately the same
plane as those of the distant KBOs, but whose perihelion is
180° away from the perihelia of the minor bodies. In
addition to accounting for the observed orbital alignment,
the existence of such a planet naturally explains the
presence of high-perihelion Sedna-like objects, as well as
the known collection of high semimajor axis objects with
inclinations between 60° and 150° whose origin was
previously unclear. Continued analysis of both distant and
highly inclined outer solar system objects provides the
opportunity for testing our hypothesis as well as further
constraining the orbital elements and mass of the distant
planet."
J.Sitchin - January 21, 2016 |
|
Astronomers Find Evidence of Ninth
(Tenth) Planet in Our Solar System
The New York Times,
The BBC, The New Yorker, National Public Radio and other highly
respected news sources reported today (January 20, 2016) that
there is strong evidence for a ninth planet in our solar system.
(I'm not quite willing to demote Pluto, so I'm saying tenth
planet). In the New York Times, reporter Kenneth Chang says:
"Two astronomers reported on Wednesday that they had
compelling signs of something bigger and farther away -
something that would definitely satisfy the current
definition of a planet, where Pluto falls short.
'We are pretty sure there's one out there', said Michael E.
Brown, a professor of planetary astronomy at the California
Institute of Technology.
What Dr. Brown and a fellow Caltech professor, Konstantin
Batygin, have not done is actually find that planet, so it
would be premature to revise mnemonics of the planets just
yet.
Rather, in a paper published Wednesday in The
Astronomical Journal, Dr. Brown and Dr. Batygin lay
out a detailed circumstantial argument for the planet's
existence in what astronomers have observed - a half-dozen
small bodies in distant, highly elliptical orbits.
What is striking, the scientists said, is that the orbits of
all six loop outward in the same quadrant of the solar
system and are tilted at about the same angle. The odds of
that happening by chance are about 1 in 14,000, Dr. Batygin
said.
A ninth planet could be gravitationally herding them into
these orbits.
For the calculations to work, the planet would be quite
large - at least as big as Earth, and likely much bigger - a
mini-Neptune with a thick atmosphere around a rocky core,
with perhaps 10 times the mass of Earth.
It would dwarf Pluto, at about 4,500 times its mass.
Pluto, at its most distant, is 4.6 billion miles from the
sun. The potential ninth planet, at its closest, would be
about 20 billion miles away; at its farthest, it could be
100 billion miles away. It would take from 10,000 to 20,000
years to complete one orbit around the sun."
The scientists were working on calculations to explain the
behavior of several Kuiper Belt objects. As a result, they were
pretty sure there was a large object that exhibited a
gravitational pull on those objects to explain their movement.
When they included a large planet orbiting in the reverse
direction from those objects into their simulation, the
calculations worked and the objects were where the calculations
predicted they would be.
"Another strange result in the simulations: A few Kuiper
belt objects were knocked into orbits perpendicular to the
plane of planetary orbits. Dr. Brown remembered that five
objects had been found in perpendicular orbits.
'They're exactly where we predicted them to be', Dr. Brown
said. 'That's when my jaw hit my floor. I think this is
actually right.'"
J.Sitchin - January 20, 2016
NEW DISCOVERIES CORROBORATE
SITCHIN
New scientific discoveries
continue to corroborate findings first suggested in Zecharia
Sitchin's books.
Homo sapiens: The successful deciphering of a female
Neanderthal genome was reported in the journal Science on
February 13, 2009. The project, undertaken by scientists at the
Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, aimed to verify when
that failed species of humans and Homo sapiens (= Modern Man)
branched off, and whether the two bad ever interbred. The New
York Times pointed out that the new findings "document two
important sets of genetic changes - those that occurred between
5.7 million years ago, when the human line split from the line
leading to chimpanzees, and 300,000 years ago when
Neanderthals and the ancestors of modern humans parted ways."
In The 12th Planet (1976), describing the Anunnaki's
genetic engineering to fashion The Adam, Zecharia wrote: "Man is
the product of evolution; but modern Man, Homo sapiens,
is the product of the 'gods'. For, some time circa 300,000
years ago, the Nefilim took ape-man (Homo erectus)
and implanted on him their own image and likeness." In The Earth
Chronicles Time Chart (The Wars of Gods and Men, 1985)
Zecharia wrote: 300,000 years ago: The Anunnaki
toiling in the gold mines mutiny. Enki and Ninhursag create
Primitive Workers through genetic manipulation... Homo
sapiens begins to multiply."
The Deluge: In The 12th Planet and Divine
Encounters Zecharia suggested that the biblical Flood was a
giant tidal wave caused by the slippage of the ice sheet off
Antarctica, causing the abrupt end of the last Ice Age circa
13,000 years ago. Two recent studies corroborate both aspects of
Zecharia's take on the subject: A study of ancient temperatures
in the journal Nature of 26 February 2009 concludes that
while warming at the end of the last Ice Age was relatively
gradual in Greenland (north Atlantic), it was "rapid and abrupt"
in Antarctica (south Atlantic), about 13,000 years ago.
A study of ancient sea levels published in Science of
6 February 2009 concludes that (a) Antarctica's ice sheet
collapsed abruptly and (b) that due to the topography of the
continent and its surrounding sea beds, the tidal wave was at
least three times higher than hitherto calculated, reaching its
maximal impact some 2,000 miles away. A diagram accompanying the
article shows the area of maximal tidal impact in the Persian
Gulf, the Mediterranean Sea and northward therefrom - the very
Lands of the Bible and Mount Ararat.
...
Sitchin's Audacious
Assertion
That planets might orbit stars other than our Sun has been
theoretically held possible, though doubtful, for some time; but
it was only in 1988 that Canadian astronomers attained the
first-ever confirmed discovery of one such planet - a
confirmation that was achieved only in 2003.
Yet it was years earlier, when The 12th Planet
was published in 1976, that Zecharia Sitchin made the audacious
assertion that not only do extrasolar planets exist, but that
other planetary systems can come into being, exist, and can also
meet a violent end. He reached that conclusion by treating the
Mesopotamian Epic of Creation Enuma elish not as
an allegorical myth of Good v. Evil (as other scholars do) but
as a sophisticated cosmogony scientifically relating our Solar
System's history.
Thus treated, he wrote, the text tells that our Solar System,
when still in its early phase, was invaded by a foreign
planet thrust out of its own solar system; eventually
passing near our Solar System, it was pulled in by gravitational
forces, ending up (after a collision) as a member of our Solar
System. The Summaerians named it Nibiru; the Babylonians renamed
it Marduk in honor of their national god. That scenario, which
explains a host of astronomical enigmas, was illustrated in the
book by several diagrams, including Fig. A:
Astounding Links to Ancient Legends
Amazingly, several highly intriguing aspects of NASA's
discoveries mesh with ancient knowledge (what many deem myths or
legends).
The second team's newly discovered world orbits the bright
southern star Fomalhaut, whose name (coming from Arabic) means
'The Fish's Mouth'. Very bright, it is the lead star in the
constellation Piscis Australis - "The Southern
Fish." Situated below (i.e. south of) the larger constellation
Aquarius ("the Water Bearer"), it has been traditionally
depicted as a fish nourished by water pouring down from the jar
of Aquarius, and linking it to the larger neighboring
constellation Pisces (that is depicted by two fishes).
As Greek and Roman astronomers going back to the 3rd century
B.C. attested, these three constellations were deemed to occupy
the 'watery zone' of Neptune in the heavens - a tradition going
back to ancient Mesopotamia which associated the three with the
god E.A. ("He whose home is water"), the original god of the
Seas and their Fishes (see Fig. B). Greek savants also quoted
the tale by the Babyloniam priest Berossus of the divine
Fish-man 'Oannes' who had waded ashore from the Persian Gulf and
gave Mankind civilization. These details dovetail with Sumerian
texts according to which EA (later also knowns as ENKI) was the
leader of the first group of astronauts from Nibiru who splashed
down in the Persian Gulf and waded ashore, dressed as Fishmen
(Fig. C)....
The Origin of Our DNA?
If so, the new discovery reveals not just from where
Nibiru/Marduk had come. Since (according to Enuma elish)
it brought the "Seed of Life" (DNA) into our Solar System - the
discovery also indicates the source where lifegiving DNA can be
found. It is a short 25 light years away - "close enough
to contemplate sending spacecraft there." Dr. Paul
Kalas, one of the new planet's discoverers, told the New
York Times. He could be right in more ways than he
realizes.
 |
|