An independent scientific panel, assembled to advise the US
Environmental Protection Agency on its study of the potential
impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water, disputed Thursday
a key finding in the draft report on that study.
In a 133-page report issued to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy the
Science Advisory Board called into question whether there were "no
widespread, systemic impacts" to groundwater from fracking, the most
significant finding in the draft report on the study, which the EPA
released in June.
The panel's report also urged the EPA to release its findings on
studies into incidences of groundwater contamination in Dimock,
Pennsylvania; Pavillion, Wyoming; and Parker County, Texas; where
some members of the public had pointed to the fracking of nearby
wells as the source of the pollution.
While the panel found the EPA's overall approach to assess the
potential impacts of fracking on drinking water supplies
"appropriate and comprehensive," it said several findings in the
executive summary of the draft report are "inconsistent with the
observations, data and levels of uncertainty presented and discussed
in the body [of the draft document]."
Concerning the EPA's finding on groundwater, the SAB's report
said the statement "does not reflect the uncertainties and data
limitations described in the body of the report associated with such
impacts."
The scientists added that while the EPA report focused on the
impacts of fracking nationally, most potential impacts from fracking
are experienced by residents on the local level.
"These local-level hydraulic fracturing impacts can be severe, and
the draft assessment report needs to do a better job of recognizing
the importance of local impacts," the SAB found.
ADVISORY BOARD SAYS STUDY CAN BE IMPROVED
In addition to criticizing the EPA draft report, the SAB also
provided suggestions as to how the final report could be improved.
For example, while the draft report looked at how the use by the oil
and gas industry of water for fracking could impact water supplies,
the scientists suggested the EPA concentrate "on areas with high
hydraulic fracturing water use, low water availability and frequent
drought."
The SAB report also said the EPA should "clearly describe the
probability and risk associated with hydraulic fracturing well
injection-related failure," and should provide additional detail on
the impacts of surface spills and releases of flowback and produced
water.
In addition, the scientists called on the EPA in the final version
of its study to provide more comprehensive information on the
toxicological effects of the chemicals used in fracking fluid.
The SAB report criticized the "agency's lack of breadth in its
analysis of most likely exposure scenarios and hazards associated
with hydraulic fracturing activities."
INDUSTRY SAYS EPA REPORT MATCHES SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
The findings in this week's report by the SAB reflected those found
in a preliminary report the panel issued last month in response to
questions posed to the scientists by the EPA.
In response to that preliminary report, a coalition of oil and gas
industry associations disputed the SAB's challenge to the EPA's
finding of no "widespread, systemic impacts."
In a December 11 letter to McCarthy, Lee Fuller, executive vice
president of the Independent Petroleum Association of America,
contended that the SAB "may be considering a revision to its
finding, based not on science, but rather pressure from special
interest groups."
The letter, endorsed by 43 state-based industry groups, said that
"EPA's draft report is very much in line with the scientific
consensus on hydraulic fracturing."
--Jim Magill,
jim.magill@platts.com
--Edited by Jason Lindquist,
jason.lindquist@platts.com
© 2015 Platts, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.platts.com
http://www.platts.com/latest-news/oil/houston/panel-disputes-us-epa-finding-no-systemic-impacts-21723501