The Star Tribune has stated that it received confirmation that Philando Castile had a carry permit. Being a permit holder added a unique element to his death because it necessarily means that he had a clean record (no felonies, no history of domestic abuse, etc.). Having a clean record means the boot lickers couldn’t justify the shooting by citing the victim’s history. Instead many of them are claiming that Castile didn’t put his hands on the steering wheel when he was pulled over which in combination with being armed justified the officer’s supposed fear for his life. What’s funny is that many of the people making this argument also claim to be pro-gun.
This is one of my favorite instances of cognitive dissonance. Gun rights advocates usually argue that being armed isn’t threatening in of itself. In fact they often scoff whenever an anti-gunners claims to be in fear for their lives when they see somebody who is armed. These gun rights advocates usually also argue that being armed should be a cultural norm. I agree with both sentiments. However, where I diverge from many supposed gun rights advocates is that my belief doesn’t give an exception to anybody wearing a badge.
Does somebody have grounds to be afraid for their life just because the see somebody else who is armed? If you don’t believe they do then why should an officer be justified in fearing for their life just because they’re interacting with somebody who is armed? It can’t be both ways, which is something a lot of supposedly pro-gun people fail to realize.
As I said, I personally believe being armed in of itself is
not threatening behavior and I believe being armed should be a
cultural norm. This also means that I don’t believe police
officers have grounds to get all “Officer safety! My life is on
the line!” just because they’re interacting with somebody who is
armed.
You shouldn’t have to expect an officer to treat you any
differently if you’re armed than if you’re unarmed. Being armed
and not immediately taking a submissive position when being
pulled over also shouldn’t justification for an officer to shoot
you. People who claim to be supporters of gun rights and also
believe that officers are justified in being afraid for their
lives just because they’re interacting with somebody who are
really anti-gunners who don’t realize it.