Are we considering all the costs?Michael Butler
Recently, Sen. Lamar Alexander took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to discuss an important issue: a proposed wind farm that would be located in Cumberland County, if approved. His opposition was quickly followed by Rep.Diane Black, who also came out against the proposal by writing to several federal agencies voicing her concerns. So why are they opposing this? "Clean" energy like wind must be a positive thing for the environment, right? And it must therefore also be a good thing for wildlife, too, yes? The truth is, the impacts of wind farms are significant and they are decidedly not positive for Tennessee's environment and wildlife. These numbers tell the story. ?23 ? Number of wind turbines proposed for the Crab Orchard Wind
Farm.?71 ? Number of megawatts (MW) the project will produce. For
comparisons sake, Doesn't seem to make much financial sense, does it? A wind farm of this size would also alter the natural landscape forever. But how about the impact on wildlife? ?600,000+ - Estimated number of birds killed by wind farms in the U.S. annually.?800,000+ - Estimated number of bats killed by wind farms in the U.S. annually.?2,000 - Number of bats killed in two months at the Backbone Mountain wind farm in West Virginia.?1,800 - Number of acres proposed to be used by the Crab Orchard Wind Farm. This number does not include acreage needed to provide transmission lines to the site ? a change in habitat requiring large applications of herbicide to maintain.?2,500,000 - The number of dollars paid by Oregon based PacifiCorp Energy for violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act when federal investigators discovered the carcasses of 38 golden eagles and 336 other protected birds (e.g., hawks, blackbirds, larks, wrens and sparrows) at two PacifiCorp wind projects in the state. Simply put, wind farms kill wildlife both directly and indirectly, lots of wildlife. Add to this problem the significant habitat destruction resulting from sight preparation and the required transmission line corridors and the impacts grow even larger and are permanent. Research into the impacts of wind farms on non-flying wildlife is scarce and are not yet fully understood. The wind energy industry has been largely given a pass on its impacts on wildlife, and the cost/benefit analysis of wind power begins to look like a lot of hot air. The question we must ultimately ask ourselves is this: Do we want to use public tax dollars to subsidize an unneeded private business to chop up our public wildlife? ? ? ? Michael Butler is chief executive officer for the Tennessee Wildlife Federation. Visit their website at tnwf.org.
http://www.energycentral.com/functional/news/news_detail.cfm?did=39196452 |