It’s a tale as old as time: The federal government wants to
reform the
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) to better serve both American
Indians and taxpayers.
There have been numerous hearings, both in the Senate and in the
House, over many decades that have explored plans that would
combine, create and eliminate programs; shuffle and/or fire
employees; increase and/or decrease spending, create new offices;
reduce office space; reduce/increase paternalism; and even allow
tribes to have a real role in the leadership.
A few years back, U.S. Rep. Don Young (R-AK), emeritus chair of
the House Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs,
went so far as to say in an ICMN interview that to reduce
bureaucracy at the BIA, the head of Indian affairs at the Department
of the Interior should be elevated to a Cabinet-level position.
“I have suggested before to other presidents that there should be a
Secretary of Indian Affairs sitting at the president’s table so that
they can not only speak, but also make decisions, rather than going
through the other agencies,” Young told ICMN. “With all due respect to
BIA—forget who’s in charge of it—they’ve got a job, but they’re not
producing anything. There’s no drive to become more helpful to tribes.”
Young’s thought was that elevating Indian affairs would not create
more bureaucracy; rather, “you don’t have to fight all your so-called
friends in the same department” for limited resources. Plus, he said,
doing away with the BIA altogether would be a bad idea, since an
underlying structure is sorely needed for Indian affairs within the U.S.
government.
The list of ideas for improving the BIA goes on and on. Some measures
have been implemented, especially regarding trust reform in the Obama
years, but most often, little to nothing has happened on multiple
fronts, especially involving Indian education. Reform legislation has
stalled multiple times, bureaucrats of different political stripes have
worked to undo each other’s handiwork, and time has just kept ticking
on.
One constant: funding has been perennially reduced for the agency in
recent years, and the Trump White House continues that trend in its
recent budget proposal, with only $2.5 billion designated toward Indian
affairs—a reduction of $370 million for the BIA and Bureau of Indian
Education (BIE) alone. Yet, at the same time, there are more federally
recognized tribes (567), all with divergent needs, than ever before.
Interior Secretary
Ryan Zinke, with his literal spurs and cowboy hat and horse, has now
been charged by his boss, President Donald Trump, to make reform happen
once again and with less money than ever, accounting for inflation.
On March 13, Trump signed an executive order entitled “A
Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch,” and he has
since directed the Office of Management and Budget “to propose a plan to
reorganize governmental functions and eliminate unnecessary
agencies…components of agencies, and agency programs.”
Could that be what Trump wants Zinke to do at the BIA? No one at the
White House is saying that, but they aren’t saying much of anything on
Indian affairs, despite repeated requests for comment. What is known is
that Trump’s executive order does not mention consultation with the
American Indian and Alaska Native communities, or consent by them to
implement any changes to Indian-focused programs.
Zinke, meanwhile, recently said that, “the reorganization is going to
be bold” at Interior, since the last time the department has undergone
reorganization was nearly a century ago.
“President Trump promised the American people he would cut wasteful
spending and make the government work for the taxpayer again, and that’s
exactly what this budget does,” Zinke said May 23 in materials released
alongside Trump’s fiscal year
2018 budget. “Being from the West, I’ve seen how years of bloated
bureaucracy and D.C.-centric policies hurt our rural communities. The
president’s budget saves taxpayers by focusing program spending,
shrinking bureaucracy, and empowering the front lines.”
BIA won’t have much choice but to get smaller, according to
Interior’s own analysis, which indicates that the $370 million reduction
under Trump’s proposal would result in the loss of 241 staff members and
probably some Indian programs, too. The structure itself will
necessarily retract, even if Zinke doesn’t do another thing. What
remains to be seen is how what remains will be reorganized.
Driving some renewed venom against the BIA is the recently released
Government Accountability Office‘s (GAO) High Risk Report for 2017
that captured how poorly BIE schools and other Indian-focused programs
are performing under BIA oversight. An entire Senate Committee on Indian
Affairs hearing on May 17 was driven by failures outlined in the report.
Melissa Emrey-Arras, director of Education, Workforce, and Income
Security Issues for the GAO, listed in her testimony a litany of
malfeasance in three key areas in Indian country. These included several
instances of misused BIE funds, inadequate oversight of health care
facilities by IHS, and the mismanagement of Indian country energy
resources by the BIA, as well as a failure to process, track, or review
program data to evaluate its own programs.
Interior officials responded by saying that they see efficiencies
coming “through partnering with tribes, landowners and federal partners
to streamline the probate process.” Some interpret this as reinventing
tribes in the lower 48 states as corporations, or taking tribal land out
of trust, which is worrying to many. Others see efficiencies coming from
eliminating the BIA altogether and putting its individual components
(education, energy, justice, etc.) under special offices within federal
departments and agencies already responsible for those functions outside
of Indian country—and which is already being done in some cases,
resulting in duplication of effort and, as in the case of the Indian
Health Service, still poor results in many instances. This gets rid of
the BIA bureaucracy which has generated horror stories, but might lose
the focus that BIA brings to Indian country issues themselves.
No one will know what Zinke’s proposed BIA reorganization will look
like until 180 days after Interior has conducted its own departmental
review. The resulting plan for reorganization will recommend which
agencies to eliminate or merge, whether agency functions should be
operated by the federal, state, or local government, or perhaps by the
private sector, and whether the costs of the programs justify their
existence.
Until then, tribal leaders and citizens might want to be in touch
with Zinke himself.
D.C. Bureau Chief Rob Capriccioso contributed to this report.
© 2017 Indian Country Today Media Network, all rights
reserved.
https://indiancountrymedianetwork.com
https://indiancountrymedianetwork.com/news/politics/will-president-trump-eliminate-bia/
|