Immunization Record concept of vaccination and disease
prevention
This bill is sponsored by
Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]. It is
attempting to coerce employees into
employer disease prevention wellness programs.
Section 3 (a) 2 refers to “workplace wellness programs and
programs of health promotion or disease prevention offered
by an employer.” The words
disease prevention are concerning since not
everyone agrees with the use of vaccines to prevent disease.
Section 2 (3) adds to this
concern:
(3) in enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (Public
Law 111–148), Congress intended that employers
would be permitted to implement health promotion and
prevention programs that provide incentives, rewards,
rebates, surcharges, penalties,
or other inducements related to wellness programs,
including rewards of up to 50
percent off of insurance premiums for employees
participating in programs designed to encourage healthier
lifestyle choices;
As well as Section 3 (c);
(c) Rule of construction.—Nothing in subsection (a)(1)(A)
shall be construed to prevent an
employer that is offering a wellness program to an employee
from requiring such employee, within 45 days
from the date the employee first has an opportunity to earn
a reward, to request a
reasonable alternative standard (or waiver
of the otherwise applicable standard). Nothing in subsection
(a)(1)(A) shall be construed to
prevent an employer from imposing a reasonable time period,
based upon all the facts and circumstances, during which the
employee must complete the
reasonable alternative standard. Such a
reasonable alternative standard (or waiver of the otherwise
applicable standard) is provided for in section 2705(j)
(3)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300 gg–4(j)(3)(D)) (and any regulations
promulgated with respect to such section by the Secretary of
Labor, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or the
Secretary of the Treasury).
Vaccines
The concern is this bill if passed
into law would be applied to penalize employees who do not
get regular vaccines imposed by an employee wellness plan.
HR 1313 is indeed a threat to anyone employed by a company
or large organization that offers a “wellness” program and
partners with government and Pharma to “give carrots and
apply sticks” to employees who do or do not go along with
government endorsed “standard of care,” which includes
receipt of
federally recommended vaccines,
whether the language in this bill says the word “vaccine” or
not.
Genetic Privacy
On top of this, H.R. 1313, would remove the existing
legal protections with respect to genetic testing. As a
result, employers could require employees either to submit
to genetic testing or to face penalties.
Currently, the 2008 legislation known as the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA for short) prohibits
such practices. HR 1313 states that GINA and other
protections do not apply when genetic tests are part of a
workplace wellness program.
“What this bill
would do is completely take away the protections of existing
laws,” said Jennifer Mathis, director of policy and legal
advocacy at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, a
civil rights group. In particular, privacy and other
protections for genetic and health information in GINA and
the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act “would be pretty
much eviscerated,” she said.
Enacting this bill could have an impact that reaches past
so-called medical concerns and could have an impact in the
area of eugenics.
Please go to the “National”
Tab on
NVIC Advocacy.
Your Congressional Representative and Two U.S. Senators will
be listed on the right-hand side of your personalized page.
Click on their names for direct links to their contact
information so you can voice your opposition to this bill.
Source(s):
healthimpactnews.com
change.org
http://www.healthfreedoms.org/new-bill-would-require-vaccines-as-requirement-and-genetic-testing-for-employment-hr-1313/