After nuclear fiasco, lawsuit seeks refunds for nearly all SCE&G customers
Source:
State
Alleging that SCE&G unfairly charged customers up to The suit says SCE&G and its parent corporation, SCANA, misled state utility regulators and power company customers by failing to tell them about the severity of troubles that ultimately caused the companies to abandon the twin-reactor effort. SCE&G and its junior partner, state-owned "This is the kind of case that is born out of huge
anger and frustration of the people,'' said Bell's case is among a growing number of lawsuits to
arise since the project was abandoned and one of at
least two seeking class action status. The other was
filed several weeks ago by a group of attorneys
including former federal prosecutor If class action status is granted by a judge,
virtually all of SCE&G's customers could be eligible for
some reimbursement, Bell said in an interview late
Tuesday afternoon. The suit seeks to represent people
who have paid in excess of "In this case, all of the rate holders are injured in
some way,'' Bell said. State Sen. The success of the case, however, depends on how
vigorously SCE&G fights. Company spokeswoman SCE&G, which has about 700,000 customers, has said it
was forced to abandon the project amid rising costs and
the departure of Both companies cited the bankruptcy of chief
contractor Westinghouse as a key reason they could not
complete the work. The project, which would have added
two reactors to complement the existing one at the
Summer plant, was originally forecast to cost about This week's lawsuit pleased state Sen. "More and more evidence has shown that there has been mismanagement,'' said Fanning, who is not involved in the lawsuit. "People are looking for ways to hold them accountable and using the courts is a fantastic way of doing so.'' The state suit, which includes representatives of
four different law firms, seeks damages for customers
charged by SCE&G. The suit takes aim at how SCANA
executives were compensated while the project was
underway. It says SCANA executives received more than The suit says SCANA and SCE&G knew for years that the
project was failing but misled the state That's particularly painful because "When power companies have so much control over our lives, they should not be able to benefit from their own misdeeds and negligence," Bell said in a prepared statement earlier Tuesday. "It's pretty simple. If you don't pay your electric bill, what do they do? They cut you off. Now, we should cut them off from future payments for a failed project. They should be held to the same standards as their rate holders." ___ (c)2017 The State (Columbia, S.C.) Visit The State (Columbia, S.C.) at www.thestate.com Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. |